Doktor wrote:
Does anyone here remember using the Zone System for rich toned B&W prints? I once had a professional darkroom (where one actually got one's hands wet), and turned out beautiful prints. But alas, digital killed the film purist. Other than gallery grade prints, any photo can be fabricated. I'd like to know if the Zone System concept can be applied in this digital omelet.
Here's what I did when I stopped printing in the darkroom and started either scanning negatives or using a DSLR:
1. Create an 8x10 step chart, from 0 to 100% black in 5% increments. Save in both grayscale and RGB.
2. Print, or have printed, the step charts. The step charts must be made by each printer, whether in house or commercial.
3. Using a reflection densitometer (borrow one if needed), determine the density of each step on each step chart printed.
4. Using Exel or equivalent software, create a line chart of density vs % black. You may see a slight difference between grayscale and RGB lines, especially in the mid range. You will need to choose which you want to work with. I personally prefer to work in RGB.
5. Assign Zone values to certain shades, and note them on the graph. Here is what I am currently using for my commercial printer:
RD 0 = Z9
RD 0.10 = Z8
RD 0.20 = Z7
RD 0.40 = Z6
RD 0.70 = Z5
RD 1.00 = Z4
RD 1.30 = Z3
RD 1.60 = Z2
RD 1.80 = Z1
RD 1.90 = Z0
These scales will be unique for each printer.
6. If the graph shows that, for instance, RD 0.70 (Z5) is at 67% black, then anywhere you have 67% black in your image will print out at Zone 5. Assuming your printer is consistent, it works every time, and you don't have to worry to much about your monitor being absolutely correct. The only thing that counts is the % black value in Photoshop or whatever program you are using.
This sounds a little complicated but it's easier than it sounds, and is also sort of fun to set up.
JackM
EDIT: Assigning Zone values to each step could probably be done by eye and personal preference also if you have some experience doing B&W in the darkroom. A densitometer would not be needed in this case.