50d or 7d
Nov 18, 2014 13:47:29 #
monte wrote:
Hi.
No, I just don't shoot stuff that's just sitting there. You mentioned wildlife, I am hoping to return to Africa and continue my love affair with that country's offerings when it comes to photographing animals in their natural setting.
Thanks for your reply,
Monte
No, I just don't shoot stuff that's just sitting there. You mentioned wildlife, I am hoping to return to Africa and continue my love affair with that country's offerings when it comes to photographing animals in their natural setting.
Thanks for your reply,
Monte
If you are spending on a trip to Africa, a worthwhile upgrade in camera would be the 7D Mark II.
See this video:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0640966241/video-capturing-nature-with-the-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=features-default&utm_medium=homepage-block&ref=features-default
Nov 18, 2014 13:53:55 #
That is a great piece of advice, however, in my case I am using my Canon 24-105 1:4 L, which is on my camera 90% of the time.
I also have Tamron's 18-270 which I have used on my trips and has given me excellent results. Finally, as a result of the 1.6 cropping factor, I recently purchased Canon's 10-18 4.5 5.6, admittedly not the fasted kid on the track but I do not envision using it very frequently so it's ok.
Thanks for your time.
Monte
I also have Tamron's 18-270 which I have used on my trips and has given me excellent results. Finally, as a result of the 1.6 cropping factor, I recently purchased Canon's 10-18 4.5 5.6, admittedly not the fasted kid on the track but I do not envision using it very frequently so it's ok.
Thanks for your time.
Monte
Nov 18, 2014 14:01:54 #
No, I think I'm comfortable with my choice. Not only that but when it comes to tech items, ie computers, tv's, and, of course, photo equipment, one can always 'stretch' to a better model. I am sure there are a great number of people out there who would love to replace their mates with a new and improved model, too....
....sorry, just a bit of levity.
Monte
....sorry, just a bit of levity.
Monte
Nov 18, 2014 14:03:36 #
monte wrote:
That is a great piece of advice, however, in my case I am using my Canon 24-105 1:4 L, which is on my camera 90% of the time.
I also have Tamron's 18-270 which I have used on my trips and has given me excellent results. Finally, as a result of the 1.6 cropping factor, I recently purchased Canon's 10-18 4.5 5.6, admittedly not the fasted kid on the track but I do not envision using it very frequently so it's ok.
Thanks for your time.
Monte
I also have Tamron's 18-270 which I have used on my trips and has given me excellent results. Finally, as a result of the 1.6 cropping factor, I recently purchased Canon's 10-18 4.5 5.6, admittedly not the fasted kid on the track but I do not envision using it very frequently so it's ok.
Thanks for your time.
Monte
I also recently got the 10-18. For the price, it was hard to beat. I am really enjoying it.
For Africa you might want more reach. The Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 is currently $869.00. This would allow you to fill your frame and utilize all of the 15MP on your sensor.
Nov 18, 2014 14:14:14 #
I am glad that you are in agreement with the many reviews I have seen of the 10-18. It is rated as a superb lens, especially given its price.
As far as 'reach,' you may be right. I was thinking that with the 1.6 cropping factor my 18-270 would be giving me approx. 430mm reach. Last time I was in Kenya I took, among various other lenses, a 70-300, and with the exception of trying to shoot some cheetas that were a little too far for that lens, it was long enough, nevertheless, your suggestion merits consideration.
Thank you for your input,
Monte
As far as 'reach,' you may be right. I was thinking that with the 1.6 cropping factor my 18-270 would be giving me approx. 430mm reach. Last time I was in Kenya I took, among various other lenses, a 70-300, and with the exception of trying to shoot some cheetas that were a little too far for that lens, it was long enough, nevertheless, your suggestion merits consideration.
Thank you for your input,
Monte
Nov 18, 2014 23:22:24 #
Swamp Gator wrote:
Given the subject matter you are primarily interested in shooting, and potential low light situations, I would go for a FF camera such as a 6D over a 7D.
Of course it depends on what lenses you have.
Of course it depends on what lenses you have.
If he's planning on shooting anything that moves - animals, kids, etc for heavens sake don't tell the man to buy a 6D. I've just sold mine because of the limited focusing ability for action photography. The 7D will be far better and don't forget that all his lenses will retain their crop factor enhanced reach!
Nov 19, 2014 00:50:44 #
Thank you so much for your response - I hadad already listed the various lenses I had, namely, three. All of which except two are meant to work wth
a cropped sensor. My friend, who has every possible latest and hotest equipment there is, and I have gone on similar shoots, and quite frankly I did not see where his FF shots were of any significant improvement over mine.
Thank you both for your responses.
Monte
a cropped sensor. My friend, who has every possible latest and hotest equipment there is, and I have gone on similar shoots, and quite frankly I did not see where his FF shots were of any significant improvement over mine.
Thank you both for your responses.
Monte
Nov 19, 2014 07:26:30 #
monte wrote:
<snip> I had already listed the various lenses I had, namely, three. All of which except two are meant to work with a cropped sensor. <snip>
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Nov 19, 2014 07:35:04 #
rob s wrote:
If he's planning on shooting anything that moves - animals, kids, etc for heavens sake don't tell the man to buy a 6D. I've just sold mine because of the limited focusing ability for action photography. The 7D will be far better and don't forget that all his lenses will retain their crop factor enhanced reach!
Clearly you did not read the whole thread.
Nov 19, 2014 14:12:07 #
Swamp Gator wrote:
Clearly you did not read the whole thread.
I have. I think you may have missed his interest in photographing animals and also his investment in efs lenses.
Nov 19, 2014 20:26:05 #
Can't do both- 'It's not always the size of the car that matters but the driver's know how.'
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.