Seagull54 wrote:
Just watched a Facebook posting from photographer Jason Lanier on the Sony mirroless A 6000 and A7S.... Quite impressive. Am currently a Nikon user, but his review has me thinking.....
Any strong opinions out there, my UHH folks?
:?:
I'm about two months into learning to use my new a6000. I really like it. I'm spoiled by a hundred years of Nikon SLR/DSLRs, but I bought this to take on a Mediterranean cruise next summer. The a6000 has pros and cons, of course.
Pro. Fast. Excellent EVF. Takes 11 images faster than you can get your finger off the button.
Great AF.
Exposure is excellent. (I usually shoot A-priority, S works well too.) Shot some landing airplanes in manual and that was good. Light weight. Quick. More
Con. Only one SD slot so no backup.
Menu interface is a little quirky for a Nikon user.
No 3rd party books yet and the Sony manual is crap.
I like to shoot video with a shotgun mic. (Built in camera mics are all awful, picking up camera noise and ambient noise.) Sony has no standard way to plug one in. (They do sell a poor quality shotgun mic for a too high price. It doesn't have shock mount and must mount directly on the flash shoe.)
Final minor disappointment is that I like to put the camera on a tripod and use a radio trigger. The Yongnuos that I use with my Nikon won't work--at least Yongnuo says they won't. Maybe someone will come up with another.
With all the Cons, they are all annoyances compared with the Pros. And David Busch is releasing a book this month. So maybe that will help.
A comment about lenses. I bought the 16-50 pancake and the 55-210. Almost immediately decided, for my style of photography, I really wanted an 18-200, but it was too late. Fortunately, I have a Japanese family and one of them has "Sony connections" and is coming in a week or so--and bringing me the 18-200.
If you decide to buy the a6000 (and I do recommend it) I'll give you an amazing deal on the 55-210 lens.