Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
Jamers wrote:
Pepper wrote:
I was in my local camera store this morning, just browsing, and overheard a conversation between an old veteran and a newbie. The newbie was looking to buy his first digital camera. After some chit chat the newbie asked the old vet what kind of camera he had and thats when it got interesting. The old vet says I never tell anyone what kind of gear I have, for your own benefit you should research and buy whats ultimately best for you which has nothing to do with whats best for me. The old vet then offered to help the newbie with the research and that conversation was very interesting but much too long for this post. I may put something together later in another post as his advice and reasoning was fascinating. He made one particular statement that the proponents of do your own research will love and its the only argument Ive heard that gives me pause. He said that by doing your own research (regarding the purchase of a new camera) by the time you finish youll know whats best for you and youll be ready to start shooting right out of the box. Youll be asking questions like how do I do this or how do I fix that instead of asking questions like, whats this for and whats that do. I thought about that for a quite a while and as I mentioned its the one argument Ive heard that would give me a reason to say do your own research but even then it would only pertain to the purchase of new equipment. I had to leave a lot out of the conversation I overheard or this would have turned into a novel as the two chatted for at least half an hour. I stood there and intently listened to the whole thing. I couldnt resist walking up and shaking the mans hand. I told him that its rare to see that kind of help given to a complete stranger in such a caring and compassionate manner.
I was in my local camera store this morning, just ... (
show quote)
This reply is like a novel. :D
quote=Pepper I was in my local camera store this ... (
show quote)
Not even close, you should see what I do when I really get wound up.
:-D :-D
Carl A wrote:
Connon or Nikon I think it's personel . Both camreas
are very good I happen to have a d40x and a d5100.
Someday there will be a Canikon merger, then it will be a moot question.
Brenie220-Leica is a venerable german brand that got the deserved reputation for the very finest line of 35mm film cameras that could be had. They made their bones on rangefinder cameras and then made SLRs too. Even though they made very fine SLRs they continued to make state of the art rangefinder cameras as well. They too now are in the digital camera business as well as most of the old line film camera companies. They also make a state of the art line of optical microscopes and other instruments used in the sciences.
Having just started out I bought Nikon D3100 which is a big help to newbies and seems to take good pictures
Yes, Leica is top of the line in all aspects. Stands above all other cameras and so does the price. Well worth it if you can afford one.
Brenie220 wrote:
never heard of a Leica. Are they good cameras? seriously!
That's one main reason that my "run out the door" camera is a Panasonic DMC FZ28. It's a long super-soom micro 4/3 camera with a vario-Elmarit Leica lens. I got it new for under $300. Used to be you paid $300 for a Leica polarizing filter!
u guis ned to git ov'r the spellin' errors and help this po gui. Nikon is superior to canon, in general. I would purchase Nikon any day over canon. I would purchase Leica if I could afford it. What I would really like is a 4x5 digial. I hear they make them.
By the way, If you suck at photography, no camera quality can make you better. If your new, find a mid range and shoot away. If you see potential, or anyone else sees potential in you. That usually comes first. Then think about an upgrade.
Believe it or not one of the best ways to get better at photos is to learn to draw. I know, you can't draw a straight line, neither could da Vinci, that's why they make rulers. Stretch yourself, check out - Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. Your camera will love you for it.
I think your correct. In both aspects. This is why I photograph.
wlgoode wrote:
Believe it or not one of the best ways to get better at photos is to learn to draw. I know, you can't draw a straight line, neither could da Vinci, that's why they make rulers. Stretch yourself, check out - Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. Your camera will love you for it.
See-told ya! And Steve -did drawing influence your photo skills? Betcha it did!
I hear over and over again about "it's not the camera, it's the photographer"
True to a point, but having good equipment does make a difference
Have you ever tried to get a shot of a 2 year old with a P&S, good luck
Ever tried to cut a straight line in a piece of plywood with a $10 circular saw with a dull blade, good luck
I was a professional auto mechanic, certified out the ying-yang, the tools didn't make me good at what I did, but they sure made my job easier and faster (= more $$)
Tools were always another argument, I have Snap-On almost exclusively, some guys used MAC Tools, or MATCO, almost none of my counterparts used Craftsman.
It's hard to take a macro, without a macro lens, so a Brownie just doesn't cut it
Let's restate because your opinion is sensible. Tools are important. The most important tool is the hand holding the other tool.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.