Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
If not Canon make lenses, then Sigma? Other recommends? Or don'ts?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Oct 7, 2014 01:42:47   #
Hohoho
 
juanderfulpics wrote:
I use 2, the 18-35 1.8 and the 100-300 2.8. Both for their uniqueness both very sharp, reasonably priced in comparison and made in Japan. I absolutely love their new lenses.


Are these sigmas?

Thank you!

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 01:44:00   #
Hohoho
 
MW wrote:
K Rockwell argues against third party lenses because even if they are fully compatible with the camera bodies when the lens is designed and released to market, the camera manufacturer can update the firmware are at any time or introduce new bodies -- with the result the comparability is lost.

I thought just a theoretical paranoia until recently. Not so, I had a Sigma that worthed perfectly on older Nilon bodies but started having problems with new bodies and with older ones when the firmware was up graded. I can't blame Sigma or Nikon for this -- its just part of the game.
K Rockwell argues against third party lenses becau... (show quote)


Hmmm. Good point. What about the ones for the sigma USB Dock?

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 01:44:54   #
Hohoho
 
Basil wrote:
Would you ming providing links to some of those tests? I'd like to read them as I'm considering this lens. Thanks in advance.


Great idea!

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2014 01:47:05   #
Hohoho
 
DebAnn wrote:
You really need to do some research before you buy. Sigma makes some excellent lenses and so does Tamron. Decide on the particular lens you want and then research who makes the best one. It will vary depending on the focal length etc. that you're looking for. All my lenses are Canon except for my 50mm Sigma 1.4. I chose that because my research showed it was better than a Canon equivalent. I love it!


Is that the Art one? I was looking at that. Nice!

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 01:53:09   #
Hohoho
 
Bill Emmett wrote:
I enjoy using a hodge-poge of lenses. I've found that to really cover a lot of mili-meters with good, or great quality lenses you have to look at your shooting style, what your subject are, and where you do your shooting. Also, what type of camera do you want to use. Since I shoot both a full frame, and cropped, which lens and which body the location, and subject really dictates the selection. When adding a lens to my collection, there is lots of research, and paining over the cost vs return. My latest acquisition is a Rokinon 8mm Fish eye. It was really a inexpensive lens, all manual, but the output is something else. I received the lens on Thursday, shot a few test shots in the backyard, and worked with them in LR. I took the lens with me to meet-up with some tourists in the French Quarter. We walked, talked and shot our way through the Quarter. I pulled out the fish eye on Bourbon St. slapped it on the 6D, and shot a few under Bourbon/Conti Street sign, and along the old bar fronts on Bourbon. They loved the portraits under the sign, and wanted me to take some more fish eye of the Marganey. So we walked on the Frenchman St. Well to sum up the entire day, I paid for the fish eye, and then some. I did learn something about all this. When processing in LR using this Rokinon, in the Lens selection, pick Sigma 8mm fish eye. This selection will pull the picture from a floating ball, to a nice full frame effect.

Oh, to HoHoHo, California heat is nothing, come to New Orleans, in August. Your bones will melt in the humidity.
I enjoy using a hodge-poge of lenses. I've found ... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 01:56:15   #
Hohoho
 
Bill Emmett wrote:
I enjoy using a hodge-poge of lenses. I've found that to really cover a lot of mili-meters with good, or great quality lenses you have to look at your shooting style, what your subject are, and where you do your shooting. Also, what type of camera do you want to use. Since I shoot both a full frame, and cropped, which lens and which body the location, and subject really dictates the selection. When adding a lens to my collection, there is lots of research, and paining over the cost vs return. My latest acquisition is a Rokinon 8mm Fish eye. It was really a inexpensive lens, all manual, but the output is something else. I received the lens on Thursday, shot a few test shots in the backyard, and worked with them in LR. I took the lens with me to meet-up with some tourists in the French Quarter. We walked, talked and shot our way through the Quarter. I pulled out the fish eye on Bourbon St. slapped it on the 6D, and shot a few under Bourbon/Conti Street sign, and along the old bar fronts on Bourbon. They loved the portraits under the sign, and wanted me to take some more fish eye of the Marganey. So we walked on the Frenchman St. Well to sum up the entire day, I paid for the fish eye, and then some. I did learn something about all this. When processing in LR using this Rokinon, in the Lens selection, pick Sigma 8mm fish eye. This selection will pull the picture from a floating ball, to a nice full frame effect.

Oh, to HoHoHo, California heat is nothing, come to New Orleans, in August. Your bones will melt in the humidity.
I enjoy using a hodge-poge of lenses. I've found ... (show quote)


Oops! Sent that last one too quickly.

I love New Awlins!

Thanks for the 411!

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 01:59:11   #
Hohoho
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Basil, off the top of my head, the best tester in the industry is Bryan Carnathan. Look for his test at "The Digital Picture".
I just feel that people should go into their purchases with eyes wide open and this is the most comprehensive test. If you Google reviews, you will find others but they are not near as thorough.
Basil, good reading and good luck! ;-)
SS


Looks good!

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2014 02:00:28   #
Hohoho
 
Basil wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion to check Bryan Carnathan's review! Now I definitely want the Sigma 50mm ART lens! His bottom line sounds like a pretty ringing endorsement:
"While I will dock a few points from this lens for occasional AF inconsistency, the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens is now the overwhelming favorite in the 50mm field. This lens delivers excellent image quality, has a beautiful design and for what you get, a very attractive price. The Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens is the easy 50mm choice for those with a moderate budget."
Thanks for the suggestion to check Bryan Carnathan... (show quote)


Nice!

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 02:03:54   #
Hohoho
 
Basil wrote:
I have really bad GAS for that Sigma 50mm 1.4 ART lens!


Haha!

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 02:06:22   #
Hohoho
 
Preachdude wrote:
First, decide whether or not you have a budget, and if so, how much you are willing to spend to get the desired results. Then, go to a reliable site like B&H or Adorama, and look at the customer reviews of lenses meeting your specifications and budget. If you find a used lens at a reliable site that fits your requirements, you can check for reviews of that lens. Looking for the right lens for your needs can be quite an adventure. Enjoy the search as well as the results!


You just never know who's seasoned on those... :-/

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 11:57:51   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
I have all Canon L lenses except for a Canon 50mm f 1.8 I inherited but love to use. I bought a Sigma 12-24mm about 10 years ago and it has done very well for me. I use both film and digital so the APSC format lenese are not an option. I use the Sigma for Architectural interiors and so far in 10 years no complaints.

Reply
 
 
Oct 9, 2014 07:45:04   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Hohoho wrote:
Are these sigmas?

Thank you!


There is only one 18-35 1.8 and it is Sigma.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.