Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Storage and Backup
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 2, 2014 10:38:23   #
Billbobboy42 Loc: Center of Delmarva
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm referring to the model designations, like Green, Blue, Black, Red.

http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=760


Jerry, is there a reference as to what the colors mean? I assume they would have something to do with speed or features. I have a red 2TB internal drive that I use in an external dock (cheaper than buying a cased external drive). I always wondered what "red" meant.

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 12:03:06   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
Bob Yankle wrote:
That's the one I bought - it's black.


Not the color of the enclosure- the quality of the drive in it: Brown line or Black line. Doubt if it is Black line

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 14:06:49   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
We get lots of questions about external backup and storage. From recent personal experience, I can recommend not getting an external hard drive smaller than 3TB. I used to buy 250GB, then 500GB, then 1TB, then 2TB. There is no such thing as too much storage space. No matter how large a drive you buy, you will soon find it filling up. Then you have to start over and buy a larger drive. Get the larger one first.

I have a desktop WD 2TB drive that is 3/4 full, and I have a Synology NAS with two 3TB drives, and they are approaching the halfway point. It's much cheaper to buy more TB originally than to start over with a larger drive.

Of course, I can always go back and eliminate a lot of junk that is filling up the drives, but that's a tedious task.
We get lots of questions about external backup and... (show quote)




:thumbup: I've gone the same route with 500gb, then 1 tb, then 2 tb, etc. My time is too valuable to waste going over all that data to weed out the junk. If I ever want anything, it's there, if I don't, hard drives are now cheap enough.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2014 16:37:52   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Billbobboy42 wrote:
Jerry, is there a reference as to what the colors mean? I assume they would have something to do with speed or features. I have a red 2TB internal drive that I use in an external dock (cheaper than buying a cased external drive). I always wondered what "red" meant.

Black is their top desktop unit, and Red is recommended for NAS. I think Blue is for the price-conscious. Green for the environmentalists? :D

I'm avoiding buying a 4TB drive, at least temporarily, by going through my pictures and eliminating many. Lots of duplicates. Then I'll start on word processing files.

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 22:11:03   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
Billbobboy42 wrote:
Jerry, is there a reference as to what the colors mean? I have a red 2TB internal drive that I use in an external dock (cheaper than buying a cased external drive). I always wondered what "red" meant.
The WD 'RED' drives are designed for use in a multi-drive RAID configured NAS. They have firmware mods designed to identify block write errors more quickly and lock out bad sectors before they can cause problems with RAID-5 reliability. They are also supposed to be more reliable when running 24/7 - - but who knows.
Here is an answer I posted in 2011 to the storage question:
*********************
Run - Don't Walk - to Amazon, ZipZoomFly, NewEgg, etc and buy a NAS (Network Attached Storage) box that will hold 4 HDD. Then get 4 of your favorite HDDs (2 - 4 TB each IF the box will handle drives that size - BE CAREFUL here - only a few will handle larger than 2TB drives), install them in the box, and configure them as RAID-5 !! Press the Format and Build 'buttons' and come back in 2 days. You will now have a drive array available on your home network (if you don't have one - you can connect via USB or eSATA) that will tolerate ANY SINGLE DRIVE FAILURE - - and I don't care WHOSE drives you're in love with - - sooner or later THEY ALL have a significant probability of failure - just a matter of time!
.
I would ALSO recommend powering your drive array with a UPS - so when the power glitches - your drive array is unaffected.
.
I have been impressed by the favorable comments regarding the QNAP TS-410 4-Bay Desktop Network Attached Storage - - although I am not sure if it will handle a 3TB drive - it WILL handle a 2TB drive. Installing 4 x 2TB drives will give me 6TB of fault tolerant storage. If a drive fails, I remove the dead one, replace it with a NEW drive, and the Array will REBUILD ITSELF, preserving ALL THE DATA!!
.
I will wait until I am certain I can install 3TB drives - and will use the above process to create 9TB of NAS.
.
OBTW: current price tag for the above 6TB array will run about $1K - $350 for the box and about $150 each for the drives. I'm hoping that drive prices will come back down out of the stratosphere once Japan recovers from the Tsunami / Flood / Earthquake and Godzilla.
***********************
What I actually did:
Got a QNAP TS-459 Pro-II (newer models have replaced now)
Installed 4 x 3TB Seagate drives in RAID-5
The NAS has undergone several firmware revisions, including the ability for me to securely hit it from anywhere on the internet. It can also serve up videos to my smart TV.
Last week, one of the seagate drives died.
I replaced it with a 4TB WD Red
As time and finances permit, I will replace the other 3, one at a time (the Rebuild takes 14 hours)
Once all 4 have been replaced, I will "EXPAND" the system and will have 12TB of RAID-5 storage instead of the 9 I now have. Remember - - with RAID-5, you use ONE drive worth of storage for backup - so FOUR x 4TB drive will produce 12TB of fault-tolerant storage space.

Reply
Jul 2, 2014 22:17:10   #
steve Loc: Iowa
 
Newest technology is wireless external hardrive. Seagate make em . Very neat

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 01:53:24   #
Beard43 Loc: End of the Oregon Trail
 
I use a Seagate 500gig external drive and still have a lot of room on it. I guess I'm not as prolific as some others.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2014 04:03:26   #
Nikonista Loc: England
 
amehta wrote:
The operating system does not have to search the drive for a file, it simply has to search the "file access table", and that is quite efficient.


The File Allocation Table comes from the 1970s and is only found now on floppies, flash drives and thumb sticks snd the like. It is however still supported in its later versions such as FAT32 for compatibility.

Windows does not use FAT as there are much better file systems available these days such as NTFS, but either way amehta is correct in that the disk does not have to be searched to find a particular file - just the index.

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 07:24:16   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Nikonista wrote:
The File Allocation Table comes from the 1970s and is only found now on floppies, flash drives and thumb sticks snd the like. It is however still supported in its later versions such as FAT32 for compatibility.

Windows does not use FAT as there are much better file systems available these days such as NTFS, but either way amehta is correct in that the disk does not have to be searched to find a particular file - just the index.

I wonder if it's more than a coincidence that computers went from FAT to FAT32, as the size of the average person has been increasing. :D

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 08:09:43   #
Oldpanda Loc: Smyrna, GA
 
If you go to Newegg and search for this model: N82E16822236626 you will see that one of the reviewers opened his drive and installed the HDD as a bare drive. He states that his was a "Green" drive.

Greens are named that for their 'energy efficiency', they stop rotating after some minutes of inactivity. The first time you access it in the morning there is a delay as it starts. MY 2TB drive takes maybe 10 or so seconds.

In response to one of your other comments, as I have gotten older I have definitely become a "FAT32" or in my case a FAT66. :-)

Reply
Jul 3, 2014 23:55:05   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
Most NAS (Network Attached Storage) manufacturers will caution against "green" drives - because they stop on their own and may miss delayed write information that the NAS Raid-5 system caches for more efficient read-write operations. Most NAS will have a power-down setting that performs a proper controlled shut-down after a predetermined period of inactivity (like 2 hours - whatever) - then will restart if accessed from the network.

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2014 06:55:14   #
vollmy041
 
You can restore your data backup by saving your data in online backup plan. I suggest you to backup all your accounts by Free CloudBacko. Once you store your data than it can be easily accessed from any machine. You don’t need to install CloudBacko, you have to only login from your favourite social media account. You will be surprised with the security features of the CloudBacko. Data you can save is 100 TB free cloud storage of charge.

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 08:55:54   #
Picdude Loc: Ohio
 
vollmy041 wrote:
You can restore your data backup by saving your data in online backup plan. I suggest you to backup all your accounts by Free CloudBacko. Once you store your data than it can be easily accessed from any machine. You don’t need to install CloudBacko, you have to only login from your favourite social media account. You will be surprised with the security features of the CloudBacko. Data you can save is 100 TB free cloud storage of charge.


It appears that CloudBacko is only a backup manager, not a storage site itself. From what I'm seeing, in order to actually store data you must first have cloud storage space available on Google Drive, Dropbox, SkyDrive, or any of the other cloud drives or combinations thereof, then CloudBacko will encrypt the data and direct the backup process to these drives as necessary. But it does not provide storage space itself.

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 09:21:50   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Nikonista wrote:
The File Allocation Table comes from the 1970s and is only found now on floppies, flash drives and thumb sticks snd the like. It is however still supported in its later versions such as FAT32 for compatibility.

Windows does not use FAT as there are much better file systems available these days such as NTFS, but either way amehta is correct in that the disk does not have to be searched to find a particular file - just the index.


Back in the 80's on some (if not all) UNIX machines there was a "Sanity Track." This was before automatic head parking. If the head dropped, it hit the ST. If the ST was sufficiently damaged, the machine could not boot up. But it did give you the following friendly notification:

“Sanity Failure”

Reply
Oct 7, 2014 09:23:03   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Back in the 80's on some (if not all) UNIX machines there was a "Sanity Track." This was before automatic head parking. If the head dropped, it hit the ST. If the ST was sufficiently damaged, the machine could not boot up. But it did give you the following friendly notification:

“Sanity Failure”

Good terminology.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.