donrent wrote:
WoW !
Great replys... Thank you
It's the same with "in body stabilization systems" like used by some Sony cameras. Sony recommends that IBSS be turned off when the camera is mounted on a tripod.
I have read that the best image quality is obtained without using image stabilization, except when the shutter speed is such that it is difficult to hold a camera steady long enough to get a proper exposure. I have never used IS, and I never buy IS lenses if there is an otherwise identical non-IS lens, because the non-IS lens are typically less expensive by several hundred dollars. For those situations when I have a camera/lens combination with IS, I ALWAYS leave IS turned off, and I've never gotten a bad shot because of not using IS.
Wow...Learned something new today. Great site and Thanks!
donrent wrote:
Why.. Is there a reason for NOT having the lens on stabil ???
When shooting with a tripod.
donrent wrote:
Why.. Is there a reason for NOT having the lens on stabil ???
When camera on a tripod.
When shutter speed is higher than the equivalent focal lenght of the lens in use.
When panning the camera.
RWR wrote:
You'll want it off when on a tripod.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you do bracketed shots with IS on with a tripod, the first image will be either higher or lower, (can't remember) than the other two.
In hdr the top gets cropped out and can ruin the series.
I use the remote but try it for yourself.
Basically, it is to lock the floating element in place. This is important when not in use to prevent damage to the stabilizer unit.
You can use the stabilizer with a tripod, it doesn't hurt a thing and actually comes in handy sometimes. It's just a nasty rumor that you need to turn it off when on a tripod.
donrent wrote:
Why.. Is there a reason for NOT having the lens on stabil ???
donrent wrote:
Why.. Is there a reason for NOT having the lens on stabil ???
I've used non-IS lenses for so long that I forget that feature even exists. I do know to make sure it's off if on a tripod. But, then again, I've hardly used it.
--Bob
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
donrent wrote:
Why.. Is there a reason for NOT having the lens on stabil ???
I've been using my 300 f/2.8 with VR off since I use it on a tripod most of the time. I set to on when using a monopod.
To be frank I haven't been able to notice a difference between on and off.
Even though it might only be milliseconds I suspect it affects focusing speed.
joer wrote:
I've been using my 300 f/2.8 with VR off since I use it on a tripod most of the time. I set to on when using a monopod.
To be frank I haven't been able to notice a difference between on and off.
Even though it might only be milliseconds I suspect it affects focusing speed.
Everyone talks about "focusing speed", but I'm not sure that is affected. There is an increase in "shutter lag" because the VR operation needs some time before the shutter opens.
rjriggins11 wrote:
You can use the stabilizer with a tripod, it doesn't hurt a thing and actually comes in handy sometimes. It's just a nasty rumor that you need to turn it off when on a tripod.
Tell this to the manufacturers whose instruction manuals recommend turning it off. :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
haroldross wrote:
Sometimes when taking action shots you may want the IS/VR switched off. This would enable the AF to be slightly quicker. This has been my experience on my 5D MK III and 7D cameras using medium length telephoto lens.
haroldross, this has been my experience also. I'm not sure what you call 'medium length telephoto' but for me is seems to be the same with what I call 'moderate telephoto' 400mm or so. TNmike
All great advice. One other reason, and I do not know how correct, is that you should have VR turned OFF when changing lens or turning off camera. This was noted in lens instruction manual.
Don
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.