SharpShooter wrote:
Rac, you need to look at the new Panosinic smartphone that was announced at Fotokina. It's 24 mp and a 1" sensor(I think?)
Look it up. THAT'S the new generation smartphone/camera combo.
Forget those little Samsung trinkets!! :lol: :lol:
SS
You sure it's a smart phone? lol
SharpShooter wrote:
Rac, you need to look at the new Panosinic smartphone that was announced at Fotokina. It's 24 mp and a 1" sensor(I think?)
Look it up. THAT'S the new generation smartphone/camera combo.
Forget those little Samsung trinkets!! :lol: :lol:
SS
That does sound impressive.
mwsilvers wrote:
That does sound impressive.
Oh I see it now, ya and the people who keep saying you can't put bigger sensors in cell phone cameras because of physics lol. Yup 1" 20 mp sensor it is :)
mwsilvers wrote:
Whatever works.
I talk to my DSLR all the time, but it never talks back like my cell phone does with my wife on the other end!! :lol: :lol:
SS
Normally, I don't like to play politics, but I found this on Google.
Koreans prefer Apple's iPhone to Samsung's Galaxy - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Koreans-prefer-Apples-iPhone-to-Samsungs-Galaxy.html‎
Jul 3, 2013 ... Samsung Galaxy phones are worse quality than rival Apple iphones ... Despite Apple's apparent popularity, the iPhone maker has seen a ... But Apple is still the most successful foreign manufacturer in South Korea, and other ...
gee4time wrote:
Normally, I don't like to play politics, but I found this on Google.
Koreans prefer Apple's iPhone to Samsung's Galaxy - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Koreans-prefer-Apples-iPhone-to-Samsungs-Galaxy.html‎
Jul 3, 2013 ... Samsung Galaxy phones are worse quality than rival Apple iphones ... Despite Apple's apparent popularity, the iPhone maker has seen a ... But Apple is still the most successful foreign manufacturer in South Korea, and other ...
And you can also find a million references that imply this group or that group prefers Apples Macs over PCs, yet Windows still dominates 90+ percent of the market world wide.
For getting photos on a smart phone, be happy with what the tiny sensors can do, Even 8 megapixel cameras don't compare in image quality with most point and shoot cameras. I have been using the Sony QX-10 camera, which I can keep in my jacket pocket or pants pocket. It uses my phone as a viewfinder, and I can send the results immediately. It stores the images on a micro SD card at 18 megapixels. It has a 10 to one zoom. It will fit on most phones by stretching the folding clamps. If it could shoot raw images, it would be ideal. It has just been reduced in price and check it out on Amazon.
mwsilvers wrote:
My biggest take aways were the lack of flexibility, the antiquated interface, the lack of several features I rely upon, (among them, live widgets, the inability to change the "permanent" apps on the screen bottom, and the lack of non home screen storage for little used apps) and of course, the miserable battery life and the diminutive screen size. For the life of me I can't figure out why its so popular. Yes there are many great apps, but there are also many great apps for Android. The iPhone has very few user updatable configuration settings and as a result the phone is so simple to use that even a child can learn everything there is to learn about it in a few hours. Perhaps the simplicity is the appeal. But personally I can't tolerate Apples "my way or the highway" approach to design. I want things configured my way, not their way.
br br My biggest take aways were the lack of fle... (
show quote)
:thumbup:
This sounds like the same discussion I've had with my daughter. The whole iXXXX infrastructure seems to work well for her, but I like the ability to configure as I wish that Android provides.
Racmanaz wrote:
Yes but it's fine, it's not different than pics taken with DSLR's that are enhanced. I just find it more impressive to see sharp non noisy pics from cell phones than I do from the same taken with DSLR's. We all expect beautiful pics taken with a DSLR in the right hands, we don't expect as much with cell phones image quality wise. :)
Agreed. Very impressive performance from the smartphone.
lsimpkins wrote:
:thumbup:
This sounds like the same discussion I've had with my daughter. The whole iXXXX infrastructure seems to work well for her, but I like the ability to configure as I wish that Android provides.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. People discuss the beauty of its design and ergonomics and then stick it in large heavy Otter cases with built in batteries to make up for the iPhone's short battery life. Go figure.
I have a iPhone 4s and almost never take pictures with it outside because it is almost impossible to see the screen. I carry my Sony RX100M3. Will have the iPhone 6+ next month. I doubt the screen will be much better, if at all and still 8mp.
This is my first post on this forum even though I've been viewing for about a year. First off, the Samsung phones are years ahead of the iphones. My wife has a iphone5 that has been put away when she got the Samsung S5.
I also tabled my iphone when I got the Samsung Note 3. The picture quality of the Samsungs is far better than the iphones. In fact all the features are better. I still prefer my Nikon DSLRs to a phone picture. No matter what anyone tells you, Samsung is a better phone.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.