Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Close up pics of jewelry
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Sep 11, 2014 18:43:36   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
davidheald1942 wrote:
12 mp is all he needs. In fact I had a Canon 5MP that would print up to 11x14 and look tack sharp.
Remember he ain't talking about portraits or counterfitting, (spelling).
ronny


I agree with you there. I have a Kodak P850, 5.1 MP, which is overkill for web pictures.

Reply
Sep 11, 2014 22:53:26   #
frozenhermitphoto
 
jeronay wrote:
Good morning,

I am looking for some guidance regarding the selection of a camera for close up pics of jewelry to be posted on a web site. Thus the camera must have download capability. Under $300 seems appropriate if possible since the camera will be used mostly for that task. Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jim


Hi Jim. I can't find the link to my ebook about photographing jewelry right at the moment so I will give you a few pointers.

Most any camera will suffice for your needs, as long as you can get sharp photos from it. If you are shooting diamonds, I recommend a manual focus lens and a camera with a high resolution LCD viewscreen. My Sony a37 has a feature called "focus peaking" that highlights whatever is in focus when in manual mode. This is handy when trying to catch focus on rings with multiple settings. Also try focusing just below the surface of the stone to bring out the highlights from the facets below. It won't hurt to review each picture under magnification to ensure you got the focus right. It slows down the work flow, but with a hundred pieces to shoot it takes less time than finding and re-shooting a single piece.

If you go with a small "point and shoot" with a macro mode, use a table top tripod to get close enough. A good solid table, light tent and display stands for the pieces are a must. If you use a DSLR or bridge camera I recommend a floor model tripod. A remote release is a must, or if unavailable use the two second delay found on most cameras. This will reduce the risk of blur from pressing the shutter button.

With jewelry the piece (if flat) should be tilted to the camera's plane of focus to show all detail. Very small pieces can be photographed next to a dime for perspective. With curved pieces (like some watch bands) don't try to stop down to f22 for greater depth of field; try a small mirror to catch the details.

Make sure to have plenty of your favorite wiping rags (like lens cloth) because dust shows up in macros quite well.

If shooting a large amount of pieces, shoot in batches and organize a workflow system so the ones that have been shot don't get mixed up with the ones yet to do.

If you have to label pieces, take a few sheets at a time of sticky notes and cut strips with scissors to make small tags.

If you will shoot more than one batch on separate days, make a note of your camera settings so that you can easily duplicate the look from one batch to the next.

Have fun!
Mike


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Sep 12, 2014 03:20:27   #
tradergeorge Loc: Newport, Kentucky
 
nicksr1125 wrote:
If the Powershot focuses close enough to get a good picture, try it. At 12.1mp it might not give you as good quality picture as you'll need. the Photobox Plus you mentioned should do quite nicely. I've seen several similar setups that are homemade for significantly less money even including lights. If I was going to recommend a camera setup, I'd go with a good full frame DSLR with at least a 20mp sensor and a good macro lens. Tamron & Sigma both make very good ones. My choice would be Tamron 180mm f/3.5 macro.
If the Powershot focuses close enough to get a goo... (show quote)


Do you really think that a 12.1MP camera would not be sufficient for images that are to be displayed on a web site, at probably less than 500-1000 pixels on any dimension? My old Minolta 3.2MP camera was more than adequate for all our web development in the day. It is only when you intend to print that the higher resolution sensor become necessary. If all I intended to do is put pics online, I would look to save some money on the camera, and make my most important spec how close it could focus.

Reply
 
 
Sep 12, 2014 08:12:09   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
jeronay wrote:
Good morning,

I am looking for some guidance regarding the selection of a camera for close up pics of jewelry to be posted on a web site. Thus the camera must have download capability. Under $300 seems appropriate if possible since the camera will be used mostly for that task. Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jim


Forgot to ask.

What is your niche in Jewelry? Are you doing fine or costume? Is your market the delicate things teenagers wear or the larger pieces the retired-to-Florida-and-really-think-my-blue-hair-looks-great set might favor or somewhere in between? Do you make broaches, rings, bracelets, hair clips or nose rings? What kind of stones, if any? Do you tend toward gold, silver, gun metal or something else?

All of these things react differently to light and my look best under different photographic choices.

Reply
Sep 12, 2014 09:00:46   #
jeronay Loc: Rockport, TX
 
The feedback from this group is very impressive. I deeply thank each of you. My wife has been a jeweler/gemologist for 34 yrs. She/we have three shops one each in CO, MN, TX. We deal in exotic, designer hand cut gemstones in a great
variety: Australian opal, topaz, rubes, tanzanite, lapis, garnets, amethyst, moonstone, tiger eye, turquoise, goldstone, jasper, black onyx, authentic luster rich pearls, mother of pearls, malachite, citrine, tourmaline and Fantasy necklaces, ear cuffs and ear threads in sterling. We are beginning the process of transitioning from brick/mortar to Web only. Initial pics will likely be ear cuffs and threads. Does that help. I deal with the admin/promotional side of the business. Look & feel will remain an important aspect of the Web side of the business.

Reply
Sep 12, 2014 09:06:35   #
jeronay Loc: Rockport, TX
 
We have perhaps 50 different product subsets related to "jewelry" and other assorted items not related to jewelry. But we plan to test the waters (Web) with just one or two lines and build up from there if it appears to be working.

Reply
Sep 12, 2014 09:18:32   #
BigWahoo Loc: Kentucky
 
jeronay wrote:
Good morning,

I am looking for some guidance regarding the selection of a camera for close up pics of jewelry to be posted on a web site. Thus the camera must have download capability. Under $300 seems appropriate if possible since the camera will be used mostly for that task. Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jim


For web photos you don't have to spend a lot of money on a camera.

A Fuji S6800 would do what you need. About $160.00

Lens 15 elements in 11 groups
EFL: 4.3-129 mm (35 mm equivalent: 24-720 mm)
Aperture: f/3.1 (W) - 5.9 (T) to f/20

Wide Macro: 1.97" (5 cm) - 9.84' (3 m)
Tele Macro: 5.91' (1.8 m) - 9.84' (3 m)
Super-Macro: 0.79" (2 cm) - 3.28' (1 m)

You will have more $ in tripod and lighting than the camera

Reply
 
 
Sep 12, 2014 09:25:02   #
BigWahoo Loc: Kentucky
 
RWR wrote:
I agree with you there. I have a Kodak P850, 5.1 MP, which is overkill for web pictures.


Here is a picture of my light box. I have since added free standing Fluorescent lighting. It is made with approx. $!5.00 of pvc pipe and an old sheet.

The front flap panel folds down with a hole cut for the camera lens.

The tripod came from a school district surplus sale for $18.00.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.