FrumCA wrote:
Try this as a position: it's a hoax. Nothing more than scaremongering for tax. Climate change is cyclic. Remember, researchers and scientists would have their funding stopped if they told you the truth. In the 1st century AD it was so warm the Romans had vineyards in the North of England; a thousand years later there was the "Medieval Warm Period"; five hundred years ago The Little Ice Age; today we have "Global Warming".
The other guy takes a position and now you too. Your position is the same as the other guy's and the one supplied for you in the link. It's just more denier rhetoric.
from the link...." Global warming is a hoax, intended to soak up money and gain power and control over people. That is it in a nutshell. Dont fall for the progressive liberal lies anymore "
I'm glad that's settled. We can continue to level West Virginia for the greater good.
WNC Ralf
Loc: Candler NC, in the mountains!
bcheary wrote:
:lol: :lol: You are wasting your time Pounder. Put them on the ITI list and move on. You just can't fix stupid. :mrgreen:
And that is why the reflublicans are floundering, you can't fix stupid! They are all talk, no facts, and would not recognize a fact if it hit them in the face.
If 'research' into the past could enable scientists, with their little graphs and computers, to predict the future, then think how many scientific millionaires we would have as a result of their investing in the stock market, or even predicting the winner of the Grand National !
Global Warming is a bad and unnecessary hypothesis, embraced by cynical, venal politicians who are mainly intent on expanding their conceited hegemony.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Griff wrote:
If 'research' into the past could enable scientists, with their little graphs and computers, to predict the future, then think how many scientific millionaires we would have as a result of their investing in the stock market, or even predicting the winner of the Grand National !
Global Warming is a bad and unnecessary hypothesis, embraced by cynical, venal politicians who are mainly intent on expanding their conceited hegemony.
Wow. You live in the UK? What is your excuse for holding moronic uneducated views? Is this kind of thinking (or lack thereof) spreading across the pond into the UK now, too?
Of course the article is from a conservative publication. What would you expect to find, support for the fact that there is Global Warming?
Of course the article is from a conservative publication. What would you expect to find, support for the fact that there is Global Warming?
Keenan wrote:
C'mon now. Putting "news source" and "conservative rag" in the same sentence is stretching things a bit, don't you think? Those two mutually exclusive terms should be as far distant from each other as any two opposite concepts can possibly get.
This from the party of truth!!!! ROFL!
You know, nobody in this world are always right. Even scientist, politicians, and the general public, make incorrect statements, but like most here, never admit they are wrong.
It seems as though, that if they cannot give a reasonable answer to a statement, they have to cover themselves by being down right rude.
Keenan wrote:
Oh. So science is defined as the left? Anything objective and truthful is the left? Wow, the more you define the left, the more I like the sound of it. Careful, pretty soon you are going to ensure that anybody who has a brain and can think for themselves will join the left, and the only people remaining in the right will be anti-science morons, racist bigots, and the religiously brainwashed idiots who completely lack critical thinking skills.
Er...wait a minute! It already is that way. Never mind...
Oh. So science is defined as the left? Anything ob... (
show quote)
Not kind Keenan, don't lower yourself to their level.
Keenan wrote:
Wow. You live in the UK? What is your excuse for holding moronic uneducated views? Is this kind of thinking (or lack thereof) spreading across the pond into the UK now, too?
With the benefit of your lofty intellect could you please answer an earlier question of this uneducated moron( though I do at least remain polite),and tell us all what the temperature the earth is supposed to be?
Choose any place, any century.
Griff wrote:
With the benefit of your lofty intellect could you please answer an earlier question of this uneducated moron( though I do at least remain polite),and tell us all what the temperature the earth is supposed to be?
Choose any place, any century.
Nice trick question. There is no temperature at which the earth is "suppose" to be. The issue isn't even what the temperature will be. The issue is the rate at which it is rising.
Ok, but don't be yelling for help when the mega tornado starts your way. just saying :mrgreen:
I've always wondered if the people who lived just before temps dropped for the Ice Age had these same conversations. I bet Rush lived in that time period also. :mrgreen:
It's happened more than once; it likely will happened again. We may freeze or burn up, but 'the times, they are a'changing' and we prepare for it or we don't. It's up to us and the more we squabble, the less time we have.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.