Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Is there a difference between zooming in and walking in
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jul 28, 2014 03:22:16   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
I like being able to zoom in, because it gives me a better chance at the candid shots I like to take.
A lot of people turn plastic if they see a lens pointed at them. But catching a natural smile, or stages of laughter is interesting to me. :D

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 03:22:43   #
adetechblog Loc: Nigeria
 
Yes ofcourse, from my opinion, when you zoom your camera lenz before taking a snap, chances are that for the picture to end blurring when you want to re-zoom it again but reverse is the case when you directly walked in

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 04:33:45   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
Lazy Old Coot wrote:
Apaflo, Go back and read the original poster's question.

Go back and read the discussion. He specifically asked about DOF, but generally asked about moving in closer as opposed to zooming. The discussion covered DOF, but also the perspective distortion that my comments referred to, and everything from barrel distortion to diffusion to the psychological effect of just being too close.

You claimed that I said something about DOF that I did not say.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2014 06:27:15   #
photon56 Loc: North America
 
Jerry Brown wrote:
LOL, OK then I guess that makes me a coward :D

Thanks for the reply and setting an old man straight.


One thing I have noticed is that a long focal point will compress space. Unlike walking in where the depth of your surroundings will be proportional.

I would like to comment on uses for a zoom...

A Heron standing in the middle of a pond. I'm not about to walk through the water and watch the bird fly away to get a shot. Best to take the shot from the bank.

Architecture where I'm capturing the top view of a monument. I don't think the authorities would be too happy with me scaling the monument to take a picture.

I shoot a lot of nature. I would scare off the animal life long before I got close enough to take its picture. Zooms come in handy when you need to keep your distance.

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 07:16:54   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
Jerry Brown wrote:
I am trying to take better portraits of my grandkids and any body else who will sit for me. I read an article in Picture Perfect about taking better portraits; it all seemed pretty straight forward except for this statement:
More importantly,

when you come in close, instead of using a zoom,

you decrease the depth of field, which, in simple terms, is the length between your focus point and some point in the distance that is in focus. What this means is that when you come in close, you capture the face in sharp focus, but the closer you get the shallower the depth of field becomes. This, in effect, blurs out the background, and because our eyes always.

I understand everything except the section that I put in a space. I'll repeat my question; Is there a difference between zooming in and walking in.? The way I understand it is that there is, in that you lose your shallow depth of field when you zoom in.

right or wrong??
I am trying to take better portraits of my grandki... (show quote)


I just tested this, and found that when zooming in, I remained stationary. When walking in, I was moving. What were your results?

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 10:27:26   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
photon56 wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that a long focal point will compress space. Unlike walking in where the depth of your surroundings will be proportional.

I would like to comment on uses for a zoom...

A Heron standing in the middle of a pond. I'm not about to walk through the water and watch the bird fly away to get a shot. Best to take the shot from the bank.

Architecture where I'm capturing the top view of a monument. I don't think the authorities would be too happy with me scaling the monument to take a picture.

I shoot a lot of nature. I would scare off the animal life long before I got close enough to take its picture. Zooms come in handy when you need to keep your distance.
One thing I have noticed is that a long focal poin... (show quote)




:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 10:34:01   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
Jerry Brown wrote:
I am trying to take better portraits of my grandkids and any body else who will sit for me. I read an article in Picture Perfect about taking better portraits; it all seemed pretty straight forward except for this statement:
More importantly,

when you come in close, instead of using a zoom,

you decrease the depth of field, which, in simple terms, is the length between your focus point and some point in the distance that is in focus. What this means is that when you come in close, you capture the face in sharp focus, but the closer you get the shallower the depth of field becomes. This, in effect, blurs out the background, and because our eyes always.

I understand everything except the section that I put in a space. I'll repeat my question; Is there a difference between zooming in and walking in.? The way I understand it is that there is, in that you lose your shallow depth of field when you zoom in.

right or wrong??
I am trying to take better portraits of my grandki... (show quote)


I will give the the final answer with regard to the title of this post. YES

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2014 10:36:32   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
RWR wrote:
I just tested this, and found that when zooming in, I remained stationary. When walking in, I was moving. What were your results?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I found that the original subject either changed their pose, or actually did pose (not the shot I wanted).
Or they got scared and the flight/fight instinct sent them into flight. (Thank goodness! I'm not sure I would like a Kamikaze hummer headed for my eyes)
So zooming is my better option to photograph the scene that had drawn my interest in the first place.

And yes, I got your results too. Moving. :lol:
Good reply! :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 10:38:29   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
boberic wrote:
I will give the the final answer with regard to the title of this post. YES


Oh, sorry. I was composting my post when you were posting the final post.
Just call mine manure. :lol:

Reply
Jul 28, 2014 15:06:07   #
Lazy Old Coot Loc: Gainesville, Florida
 
I can't argue with that. I've never been able to walk without moving<g> ........ Coot

RWR wrote:
I just tested this, and found that when zooming in, I remained stationary. When walking in, I was moving. What were your results?

Reply
Jul 29, 2014 00:59:15   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Lazy Old Coot wrote:
I can't argue with that. I've never been able to walk without moving<g> ........ Coot


Except on a treadmill. ;)
What a waste of effort. I'd rather be out. :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2014 22:04:08   #
Lazy Old Coot Loc: Gainesville, Florida
 
I don't think you're likely to find a Lazy Old Coot on a treadmill, at least not this one<g>! ....... Coot

SonnyE wrote:
Except on a treadmill. ;)
What a waste of effort. I'd rather be out. :thumbup:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.