GOP Wants Mitt Back: 70% Of Republican Voters Are Open to Voting For Romney in 2016
Jul 20, 2014 06:30:17 #
johnst1001a
Loc: West Chester, Ohio
At least the age thing would be quiet. Mitt and Hillary are about the same age, Romney a few months older.
Jul 20, 2014 09:03:57 #
Why not they have no one else. The rest of the GOP 2016 candidates can't reach 20% in their own party
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
Jul 20, 2014 09:33:41 #
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Yeah, tired old white men leading them to disaster. I am sure the DNC is readying the 47% video again.
No what we need is a cool college professor without any experience to lead us to other peoples money, at least until it runs out!
Jul 20, 2014 10:44:06 #
dljen wrote:
To regurgitate a failed candidate has to be desperation.
Wouldn't Hillary fit right into that idea just as well?
For those of us who liked Romney the last election, why would we like him any less this next time? Just as the Liberals seem to have liked Obama both times and many still like him.
Dennis
Jul 20, 2014 11:03:31 #
steve03 wrote:
Why not they have no one else. The rest of the GOP 2016 candidates can't reach 20% in their own party
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
What was Senator Obama's poll numbers at this time in the 2008 campaign?
Jul 20, 2014 11:05:31 #
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
What was Senator Obama's poll numbers at this time in the 2008 campaign?
He was no running at this time in 2006. These guys are and ther own party don't like them
Jul 20, 2014 11:05:31 #
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
What was Senator Obama's poll numbers at this time in the 2008 campaign?
He was not running at this time in 2006. These guys are and their own party don't like them.
Jul 20, 2014 11:16:50 #
dljen wrote:
That's right. But she ran and she lost so she's being regurgitated. The Dems threw her under the bus in '08 but now they want her back. Is that because they don't have anybody else?I don't believe Hillary was ever nominated for a candidate to be president by the DNC, unlike Romney.
Jul 20, 2014 11:20:03 #
Laugh at Mitt if you want you small minded liberals.
Everybody knows that he was far more qualified to be POTUS than the joke in office now, whose only qualification was that he is half-black and half-white.
With Mitt in charge we no doubt would have a much different world. The influx of immigrating children would be nothing compared to what we have today. With a better understanding of foreign policy Iraq would be in better shape than it is today (although I do not believe anybody could ever fix the mess in the middle east --- so why keep trying). And last but not least, a president with a back-bone (of which Obama has none) would have dealt with Russia in a much different way. Most likely those on MH17 would still be alive today.
Everybody knows that he was far more qualified to be POTUS than the joke in office now, whose only qualification was that he is half-black and half-white.
With Mitt in charge we no doubt would have a much different world. The influx of immigrating children would be nothing compared to what we have today. With a better understanding of foreign policy Iraq would be in better shape than it is today (although I do not believe anybody could ever fix the mess in the middle east --- so why keep trying). And last but not least, a president with a back-bone (of which Obama has none) would have dealt with Russia in a much different way. Most likely those on MH17 would still be alive today.
Jul 20, 2014 11:23:14 #
Jul 20, 2014 11:24:54 #
EdJ0307 wrote:
That's right. But she ran and she lost so she's being regurgitated. The Dems threw her under the bus in '08 but now they want her back. Is that because they don't have anybody else?
Elizabeth 2016
Jul 20, 2014 11:28:56 #
Given the current Democratic lineup 70% of the Republican voters would vote for his dog and know they made the better choice.
Jul 20, 2014 11:31:06 #
bvm
Loc: Glendale, Arizona
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Yeah, tired old white men leading them to disaster. I am sure the DNC is readying the 47% video again.
Good morning RACIST.
What are you going to say IF they, the DNC, run Hillary or Liz?
Are you going to say that those Helen Thomas look a likes, are Faux whites?
Jul 20, 2014 11:38:54 #
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Mittens? Mittens? He'd be killed against Hillary. His failed polices did not work twice. What makes you think it'd work the 3rd time?
Nevermind, I know the answer: DESPERATION.
Nevermind, I know the answer: DESPERATION.
Jul 20, 2014 11:41:44 #
dljen wrote:
To regurgitate a failed candidate has to be desperation.
Voting for a pot head who never did anything in his life the second time after a proven record of failure is a sign of insanity!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.