FOX Puts MessMBC & CNN In The Toilet!
Jul 4, 2014 09:32:54 #
ted45 wrote:
Pointing out that they are lawyers just confirms that you can't trust them.
8-)
8-)
As Steven Wright opines;
99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name! :lol:
Jul 4, 2014 09:43:35 #
user47602 wrote:
ya... they have the 65-79 Cranky White Male Demographic all sewed up! :mrgreen:
:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 4, 2014 09:44:00 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
nakkh wrote:
Old white people love their white white news read by white people!
Unh????????? Fox News Detroit is presented by several Black-Americans, Alan Lee, Lee Thomas, Q Jamieson et al... They do an excellent job and I like to watch them. BTW: I'm white.
Jul 4, 2014 09:44:37 #
Jakebrake wrote:
Yea, along with the 29-54 demographic as well, if you had bothered to read the article there Einstein!
What is with your ignorant name calling? Grow up dude!
Jul 4, 2014 09:45:31 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Jakebrake wrote:
Yea, along with the 29-54 demographic as well, if you had bothered to read the article there Einstein!
Liberals are only up to "Reading 101, Page 1, first word."
Jul 4, 2014 09:55:04 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
warwoman wrote:
OWMC Alert.....OWMC Alert!!!! (Old White Men Card). Gee, in y'alls 52 card deck, that has to be up there around the 10 of spades, I'd guess.
Speaking of "OWM"(Old White Men) there naaakkkehhh, you don't look too damn recent yourself...unless it's the drugs over in California that did that to ya! You need to hook up with that trucker hating filly from Pennsylvania, then y'all would have two decks to play with.
Speaking of "OWM"(Old White Men) there naaakkkehhh, you don't look too damn recent yourself...unless it's the drugs over in California that did that to ya! You need to hook up with that trucker hating filly from Pennsylvania, then y'all would have two decks to play with.
:thumbup: I think both those decks are short 51 cards.
Jul 4, 2014 09:55:26 #
Jul 4, 2014 09:57:17 #
lone ranger wrote:
perhaps like yourself???
who remians UN INFORMED!!
who remians UN INFORMED!!
If you would hit "quote reply"we would know who you are referring to. It's a common mistake made by many rookies here on the forum though.
:?:
Jul 4, 2014 09:58:44 #
what I meant sarge, is that most americans, even the sheeple, dont care for obama any longer, as he has exposed himself, to be nothing more then a wind bag
Jul 4, 2014 10:00:46 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Jakebrake wrote:
Naw, not even going to waste my time there ole bozo, it's about time you start providing links to your obfuscating statements for me to even consider taking you seriously! You and your liberal hyperbole are a joke here on the forum!
I'm somewhat surprised to see the looney liberals watch tv news. I thought they got all the news they want from the National Enquirer.
Jul 4, 2014 10:01:44 #
nakkh wrote:
Old white people love their white white news read by white people!
Thanks for the bigoted comment.Happy 4th bigot.
Jul 4, 2014 10:03:51 #
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Thanks for the bigoted comment.Happy 4th bigot.
Jul 4, 2014 10:06:49 #
dljen wrote:
You're so right they do. Judging by FOX's FB posts... (show quote)
This is what you get when an idiot,closed minded half person operates a key board.
Jul 4, 2014 10:07:48 #
indycaver wrote:
What is with your ignorant name calling? Grow up dude!
You are absolutely correct. I will indeed refrain from lowering myself to the pathetic level of a liberal.
Jul 4, 2014 10:22:24 #
ole sarg wrote:
The interesting thing is that people who watch Fox News know less about what's going on than people who watch no news at all!
Look it up!
Look it up!
LOL just more lies from the progressives, yes that has been reported but then again, one would have to consider the source and validity of the study. The Farleigh Dickinson University study that you refer to and that was so widely reported on has been blocked, you can't access the study, or at least I have not found a way to... I wonder why that is? Do you think that maybe it was just a little to subjective allowing the school to manipulate the data... Do you think that just maybe the school does not want the public to see the particular questions and answers used in the study? I am sure that they did not start out with a preordained outcome and arranged the study to confirm their preconceived notions... What do you think Sarg? Oh. Hell, maybe they did it the way that Climate science does it.... if they don't like the hard data they find ways to object to it and replace it with estimated data.... maybe that is how the Farleigh Dickinson University study was done....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.