Court decision on Hobby Lobby case
Jul 1, 2014 15:30:58 #
Ront53
Loc: Maryland
user47602 wrote:
in the bigger picture... it is a loss of an individual's rights versus the gain of a corporation's rights
The only thing that is loss is that the company will not pay for and abortion pill. If you want to keep from having a baby from unprotected sex, go buy your own pills. The people/government will pay for them. These are companies that are owned by 4 or 5 people and do not beleive in abortion. Liberals, please get your facts straight and stop believing the crap coming from the women's right groups.
Jul 1, 2014 15:31:06 #
marblclear wrote:
Who do you work for? I'll bet whoever it is, they... (show quote)
When and where did these so called rights come from, I have yet to see a liberal address that issue. And please tell me how the case has stripped the employees of Hobby Lobby of any rights... You won't because you have no good basis for an argument and you do not even know what the decision says...
Hey, I have a little tit for tat on that taliban statement of yours that is much more accurate and appropriate.
Liberals are like Ghangis Khan, they would enslave us all and take from us what is rightfully ours...
Jul 1, 2014 15:31:52 #
Ront53
Loc: Maryland
SpeedyWilson wrote:
How have women lost? Any female employee of Hobby Lobby, or any other company, can freely go and buy any contraceptive they want to use.
The ruling only says that Hobby Lobby doesn't have to pay for about four contraceptives that induce abortions. They still provide money for a much larger number of different contraceptives.
The ruling only says that Hobby Lobby doesn't have to pay for about four contraceptives that induce abortions. They still provide money for a much larger number of different contraceptives.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 1, 2014 15:34:52 #
venturer9
Loc: Newton, Il.
SwedeUSA2 wrote:
Not at all. It was your statement that was idiotic, to say the least and in a moderate, humble way.
And, btw, do not call me an idiot. We have had enough of your inflammatory name calling on this forum.
And, btw, do not call me an idiot. We have had enough of your inflammatory name calling on this forum.
Let me see.... Did I call you an Idiot... NO
Did I call your statement Idiotic....Yes...
Major difference there Swede
And I challenge (that will not be taken) that you go back through 100 of my posts and see how many inflammatory names I have called anyone... And if you do find one or two or even 100, you will notice a major thing.... They are in response to names I was called....
Mike
Jul 1, 2014 15:35:26 #
"Some women cannot use oral birth control and the only option open to those women is an IUD"
What, condoms don't work either ?
What, condoms don't work either ?
Jul 1, 2014 15:37:52 #
Jul 1, 2014 15:39:58 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
When and where did these so called rights come fro... (show quote)
Wow, touche'!!! You certainly told me!
Jul 1, 2014 15:42:50 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
"Some women cannot use oral birth control and the only option open to those women is an IUD"
What, condoms don't work either ?
What, condoms don't work either ?
The only option for a woman.
Jul 1, 2014 15:45:52 #
There are other ways of a being sexually satisfied other than copulation...
dljen wrote:
The only option for a woman.
Jul 1, 2014 15:46:22 #
marblclear wrote:
Wow, touche'!!! You certainly told me!
If you read through this thread I have made a cogent argument surrounding this decision, something that you are clearly unable to do... But I would welcome the opportunity to read your attempt.
Jul 1, 2014 15:47:49 #
Jul 1, 2014 15:47:55 #
My goodness I didn't know we had so many lawyers that know so much about the ACA. And also all the doctors that know so much about a woman's body. It just makes me proud to be counted among these experts.
Jul 1, 2014 15:50:41 #
SpeedyWilson wrote:
It's amazing to see the difference in reporting this event between CNN and FOX.
The angry people are on CNN, and the happy people are on FOX.
The angry people are on CNN, and the happy people are on FOX.
Both networks have more than their fair share of idiots and quacks. The sooner you realize that, the better. No one should be required to surrender his/her religious beliefs because they own a business. On the other hand, female employees should be able to secure health care consistent with their beliefs on conception and reproduction. If they work for Hobby Lobby, health care coverage on those difficult choices should be made available to them at no additional cost. They should not be forced to pay extra money simply to accommodate their employer's religious beliefs. Some idiot will say, "Well, they don't have to work for Hobby Lobby." Get real. In this economy, people have to take jobs where they can find them.
Jul 1, 2014 15:52:43 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
There are other ways of a being sexually satisfied other than copulation...
Yeah. Michael Jackson croons, "Beat It!"
Jul 1, 2014 15:52:58 #
[quote=venturer9]Let me see.... Did I call you an Idiot... NO
Did I call your statement Idiotic....Yes...
You said:typical idiot response not that my statement was idiotic. .THAT's the difference. And if you cannot understand the difference...well, it's not for me to help you with that.
Did I call your statement Idiotic....Yes...
You said:typical idiot response not that my statement was idiotic. .THAT's the difference. And if you cannot understand the difference...well, it's not for me to help you with that.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.