Court decision on Hobby Lobby case (Page 29): For someone so new to the UHH, you sure do like to call people names... Must be a progressive as that's all they know how to do... There...

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

For someone so new to the UHH, you sure do like to call people names... Must be a progressive as that's all they know how to do... There is no denying of birth control here, just abortion methods, and it's not denying them, just not paying for them to do it this way. Evidently you can in late on this thread & have not bothered to read all of the pages.... You sir, are the Neanderthal....

marblclear wrote:

Who do you work for? I'll bet whoever it is, they... (show quote)

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

Bazbo wrote:

None of my purchasing choices are based on religion, so your analogy completely fails. I personally don't care if people buy cheap crap from HL regardless of the source.

HL is making a religious argument, not an economic argument.

I guess I am completely wrong to expect Evangelicals to be consistent. They use their religion when it suits them and then turn a blind eye when it doesn't. My mistake for pointing out the obvious hypocrisy.

Obvious hypocrisy is the keystone of all you democRAT little Nazi's.
You try to force everybody to think your way or else, kind of like your friends in ISIS.
You don't like anything or anybody except your warped friends.
And you think it's impossible to wind up like Robespierre, But I think it's in your future since your mother didn't have the morning after pill either.

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

marblclear wrote:

Oh, I see. You're from Arizona, well I guess that says it all!

I'll bet you wish you did.
Instead you live in the land of fruits and nuts

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

LLucas wrote:

'Saw this post earlier:
"When your Jehovah's Witness boss refuses to let you have a blood transfusion, when your Scientologist boss refuses to cover psychiatric medication, and when your Christian Scientist boss refuses to cover anything, thank your wonderful Supreme Court! The floodgates have been opened to allow an individual boss to dictate your healthcare choices. And people say 'ObamaCare' is an intrusion on your freedoms? Wake up, America!"
-Ryan Denson

Do you actually believe the tripe you are spewing? If you do you are either extremely naive or stupid! :oops:

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Jakebrake wrote:

Do you actually believe the tripe you are spewing? If you do you are either extremely naive or stupid! :oops:

So Jake,
Why is he stupid. He makes a valid point. If I have a moral or religious objection to something, SCOTUS says I don't have to do it.
Why can't I refuse to pay for blood transfusions if I object to them?

marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA

Screamin Scott wrote:

For someone so new to the UHH, you sure do like to call people names... Must be a progressive as that's all they know how to do... There is no denying of birth control here, just abortion methods, and it's not denying them, just not paying for them to do it this way. Evidently you can in late on this thread & have not bothered to read all of the pages.... You sir, are the Neanderthal....

Firstly, I am not a sir. And secondly, I have read all of the threads but as a woman who is pro choice, I always find it interesting when a bunch of old men, who really know nothing about women's bodies are making all of the decisions. Trying to explain how this feels to me and other women would be like trying to explain compassion, empathy, and understanding to someone like you. People who believe that we need to go backwards in time are not really understanding society today. I'll bet you are one of those people who don't believe in giving gay people their rights. That is why I call so called Christians, the Taliban of the US and other men Neanderthal. I may be progressive but you my friend are regressive. Oh, sorry I guess we are not friends.

To be honest I really do not like to go on these rants but as you can probably tell I feel very passionate about this subject and have for a very long time.

marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA

bvm wrote:

I'll bet you wish you did.
Instead you live in the land of fruits and nuts

You are hysterical. Now I know you are from the dark ages. No one calls California the land of the fruits and the nuts anymore. And when you say fruits, what exactly do you mean by that? You mean apples, oranges, strawberries and other such delicacies or do you mean something else?

SwedeUSA2

marblclear wrote:

...

To be honest I really do not like to go on these rants but as you can probably tell I feel very passionate about this subject and have for a very long time.

You are right in your views. More power to you!

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

So, tell me. How is this ruling making us go "backwards in time"?... My wife agrees with the ruling as well & she is a woman...No one is denying a woman the right to use one of these methods, just that the employer in this case does not want to pay for it. Does that mean you can't go & pay for it on your own dime ? No it doesn't....BTW, I am an agnostic, so your claims about my being a Christian have no bearing in fact. You merely have shown that you are nothing more than a bigot...

marblclear wrote:

Firstly, I am not a sir. And secondly, I have rea... (show quote)

marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA

I just had someone, who has posted something in the neighborhood of 7000 posts on this forum, call me a newby. Well, maybe I am, but I can sure say one thing, I have a lot better things to do than spend the better part of my life doing this. Once in a while a subject comes up that I feel very strongly about and I express my opinion. Other than that I have a life.

marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA

Screamin Scott wrote:

So, tell me. How is this ruling making us go "... (show quote)

Oh wow, my feelings are hurt. I didn't call you a christian, so I made a bad assumption about where your coming from. However, since you wife is married to you, I think that says it all. I'm sorry that wasn't nice. I apologize.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Well, well. This is a photo forum & if you bothered to look, I have many posts in the other forums on this site... I see you have not even bothered to start any threads and almost all your posts have been in the "chit chat" forum.... Boy, talk about well rounded.... More like a troll just here to espouse your political beliefs is more like it... I don't see where you have even bothered to post any images & here this is a photo forum...

marblclear wrote:

I just had someone, who has posted something in the neighborhood of 7000 posts on this forum, call me a newby. Well, maybe I am, but I can sure say one thing, I have a lot better things to do than spend the better part of my life doing this. Once in a while a subject comes up that I feel very strongly about and I express my opinion. Other than that I have a life.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

marblclear wrote:

But you don't have a right to deny an employee their rights just because you happen to disagree with their method of birth control. I guess you want us to go back to the dark ages

Yes Yes, the dark ages.... I remember them well, the period of time that existed prior to August 1, 2012.

Exaggerate much?

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

I think the point is not the danger of govt bureaucracy, but rather the danger of Corporate Statism. I don't think he's nuts

Corporate Statism? How in the world does this ruling strengthen corporate statism? This is all you have Bazbo, the decision is available online for you to read, you are one of the intellectuals here, you know your blog and all, I would expect a better argument based on the facts of the case and the courts ruling from you.... Not vacuous statements based solely on emotion.

dljen Loc: Central PA

marblclear wrote:

I just had someone, who has posted something in the neighborhood of 7000 posts on this forum, call me a newby. Well, maybe I am, but I can sure say one thing, I have a lot better things to do than spend the better part of my life doing this. Once in a while a subject comes up that I feel very strongly about and I express my opinion. Other than that I have a life.

Don't worry about that, Marblclear, emotions are high on both sides and people are being mean. I was furious yesterday because I am very much pro-choice and to me, this is on the road to taking our rights away. HL stands as a very self-righteous company and the religious owners, the Greens, are not so smart, in my opinion. They'd better have a lot of crafty conservative women shopping or they may be in a heap of trouble. I may be wrong about that, but women are boycotting and I've no reason to think they won't. Time will tell.

Some women cannot use oral birth control and the only option open to those women is an IUD. HL has chosen to believe that religion trumps medicine and has put their judgement on that. Getting an IUD costs from $500-$1000. Whatever. I just hope this does not become law for everyone...our nation is regressing because of the Republican Supremes. The Republicans on UHH can pretend this is wrong, denouncing it any way they want but women see this as the Republican war on women.