Can any of you people that continue to bring up these silly "What If's" actually understand what has gone on in this ruling. In all cases, and in this case particularly NOTHING has been done to keep you/them from getting the pills they want,, Only that their insurance will not pay for it..

My wife goes to a Chiropractor and as part of her treatment she receives acupuncture. Our insurance does not pay for acupuncture, only the "manipulation" BUT she still gets Acupuncture...we just pay for it out of pocket...

If you believe that this one very simple ruling will begin a horrible land slide of Pro Christian/Religious rulings, you are a bit more simple minded that I supposed.....

You were not upset when Prayer was taken out of schools, You are apparently not upset when you see where some school has halted the football team having a prayer before the game. You are apparently not upset when the Valedictorian has his/her speech torn up because "God" was mentioned. Yet your panties are on fire over this very small victory of Religious Belief over PC....

Mike

They better... but most rule makers, are older white men, who don't give a tinkers dam about womens' rights. If they want all these babies born, men better step up to the plate with support. If not, and many do not, the people should keep their mouths shut about taking away such basic meds (expensive) as womens' conception. Also if a corporation can now make policy based on its ideology, they should immediately lose it's tax exempt status. This contraception issue and womens health care have not been an issue for many many years until our President was elected. I feel it's sorry day for this country when SCOTUS will allow corporations to dictate what is best for a certain segment of the population. Ok guys - are you ready to be a father to 5+ kids.

And well they should be pissed. However, I do not see this issue as being between the corporation and the individual. Indeed I see it as a misguided freedom of religion issue between the individuals running the corporation and the individuals under their control. They should not in my opinion as employers, whether under corporate, partnership or sole proprietor status, be able to impose their religious beliefs upon their employees. It is against all fair employment statutes to refuse a person employment based on their religious beliefs or to fire a person based on their religious beliefs. This decision should have followed those precedents. It did not and no matter how it was rationalized, that decision was deceitful and in my opinion wrong. Athough I disagree fully with the governments incursion into our health care system, I feel that if that system is put in place and is being used, that exculpations obviously based on religion should be disallowed. The SCOTUS may exercise their right to insert their heads up their asses but they have no right to no knock entry into a womans bedroom.