Croce wrote:
I don't really know the answers to your questions other than being able to apply inadequate layman logic. In the 1975 fire were the floors subjected to a 9700 gallon fuel spill to intensify the fire as was the N Tower on 911? The S Tower was hit at 540 mph with a dump of 9200 gallons of fuel. Seems like a little more than I would pour on charcoal in the backyard, but. The other thing which bothers me is the one sided certainty of the conspircacy theorists which is solely based on video likeness of the collapse as appearing like a vegas hotel demo. Larry, I do not have the answer nor sufficient knowledge to come to any conclusion, however if the theory is based on only physical appearance from a video of the collapse, I feel I certainly have enough knowledge to support doubt. If anyone can come forward with facts showing that the buildings were rigged with explosives prior to the collapse I would certainly give it due weight. What explosive, where were they placed, how much of it, when was it placed, how were they able to accomplish the plant without discovery, how were they detonated, by whom? A hell of a lot more than conjecture is needed to support the theory. I doubt anyone other than closed minded naive, blind loyalists would reject out of hand, the presentation of such proof. Certainly I would not reject offered proof, I doubt anyone on this forum would but theories which amount to bullshit subject to nothing but so called "proof" offered by the likes of our local conspiracy theorists? I think not.
I don't really know the answers to your questions ... (
show quote)
I don't have all those answers either but I know the "official" storyline is not believable under scrutiny. Just The free fall speed makes the whole thing suspicious regardless of the footprint of the fall. I have come to understand it is not my responsibility to provide all the answers and because I can't it does not mean I have to accept absurdities in the "official" story either.
Building 7 did not have an ounce of jet fuel in it nor was it impacted by the jets directly. It came down at free fall speed too. 3 steel girder buildings all coming down at an extremely small deviation from free fall speed is suspicious, to say the least. It was the first time in history a steel girder building came down due to fire and here we have 3, in one day! How that was managed, if it was managed, is not my responsibility to explain but many smarter than me have demonstrated the official story has some serious credibility issues.