Mirrorless Cameras
Jun 7, 2014 06:33:41 #
I've been looking at the new Nikon 1 j4 which is just out. Pricy but some really nice features in a mirrorless camera. Worth taking a look at.
Jun 7, 2014 06:34:32 #
Real men and women pack heavy cameras with ten lenses and never eat quiche! I keep telling my shoulder and back that on every trip. So here is my plan:
On my next trip to NY which is quite often as I live there part time I will once again schlep my gear to B&H with an extra card. They have tons of mirror less cameras and in the store , not ideal conditions, I will snap off some images with the Fujifilm XT1 and the Olympus as well as my Nikon gear-all under similar settings. Then I'll do. 17x22 print with similar cropping and put it to the test-isn't that a true measure of how good each one is, the final product?mI will repost the results. If anyone has preempted me and done this already I would love to hear your results.
On my next trip to NY which is quite often as I live there part time I will once again schlep my gear to B&H with an extra card. They have tons of mirror less cameras and in the store , not ideal conditions, I will snap off some images with the Fujifilm XT1 and the Olympus as well as my Nikon gear-all under similar settings. Then I'll do. 17x22 print with similar cropping and put it to the test-isn't that a true measure of how good each one is, the final product?mI will repost the results. If anyone has preempted me and done this already I would love to hear your results.
Jun 7, 2014 07:03:29 #
I have printed 30 x 40 before with good results on an hp5500 uv large format printer (at my work office). Though mpix.com I have done 24x36, 18x24, and 12x18. I also have a 5 shot sticthed pano printed 30" x 10' and is hanging at a local vineyard. And then there is the 24' billboards on us131 and i75, but that is a different process.
Jun 7, 2014 07:07:13 #
Impressive and thanks for the quick response. Now I'm really charged to try it myself because I simply can't drag the heavy gear around especially in hot climates and up and down mountains and steps. It become even harder when I realized that there is another alternative.
Jun 7, 2014 07:14:08 #
My entire bag maxed out is 6 lbs and that includes 5 lenses and some accessories. My lightest setup combo is just a touch over 1 pound.
Jun 7, 2014 07:35:20 #
sueyeisert
Loc: New Jersey
I also love the Fuji. And I also have the EM-5.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
anotherview wrote:
The Fujifilm X-E2 has an APS-C sized sensor, like ... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 7, 2014 07:43:20 #
[quote=jerryc41]...
... Although they have smaller sensors than DSLRs, "
Have you heard about Sony A7 and A7r? Mirror less AND full frame?
... Although they have smaller sensors than DSLRs, "
Have you heard about Sony A7 and A7r? Mirror less AND full frame?
Jun 7, 2014 08:12:26 #
I am using the Nikon V2. Have 10-100 as well as adaptor so an still use all of my nikon lenses. Almost stopped using D300. Like any camera it is a tool. Learn how to use it and you will love it. Not the camera that takes the picture but the knowledge and experience with the tool that counts. I am not sure we will be using the current DSLR today but all will be using the mirrorless
Jun 7, 2014 08:15:16 #
If I had to do it all over again, I'd still buy the EM1.[/quote]
I agree whole heartedly! After 40 years of shooting with Nikons, from the F through the D610, I got tired of the increasing weight and cost (and advancing age) :-( ) and switched to Olympus, I have the EM1 (incredible machine once you figure out how to set it up!) and the EPL3 as a back-up. Other than the loss of 2 stops of depth of field, there is nothing I miss. The lenses are small, light and sharp and the in camera stabilization is great. The EM1 plus my heaviest lens weighs less than my heaviest lens did with Nikon. The picture quality is excellent.
I agree whole heartedly! After 40 years of shooting with Nikons, from the F through the D610, I got tired of the increasing weight and cost (and advancing age) :-( ) and switched to Olympus, I have the EM1 (incredible machine once you figure out how to set it up!) and the EPL3 as a back-up. Other than the loss of 2 stops of depth of field, there is nothing I miss. The lenses are small, light and sharp and the in camera stabilization is great. The EM1 plus my heaviest lens weighs less than my heaviest lens did with Nikon. The picture quality is excellent.
Jun 7, 2014 08:37:35 #
jerryc41 wrote:
This question, in vary forms, is posted several times a day. Lots of discussion here. Just sit back and absorb the wisdom.
Mirrorless cameras are selling very well, and there is a huge selection. Although they have smaller sensors than DSLRs, they have the electronics to deliver excellent images with a pocket-sized camera. I'm giving thought to the Sony RX100 III. It will be available within two weeks.
Mirrorless cameras are selling very well, and there is a huge selection. Although they have smaller sensors than DSLRs, they have the electronics to deliver excellent images with a pocket-sized camera. I'm giving thought to the Sony RX100 III. It will be available within two weeks.
The Fujifilm mirrorless has the same sized sensor as 90% of the DSLR's, and some of the sharpest lenses on the planet. While not exactly pocket sized, they are much smaller and more portable than your average DSLR. Some Pros are using these cameras, abandoning the now ancient reflex mirror.
Jun 7, 2014 08:47:53 #
Psdunner wrote:
Real men and women pack heavy cameras with ten len... (show quote)
Haven't printed the results, but looking at the results on a big monitor at actual size the Fuji images beat the cropped format Nikon images for color and sharpness and contrast. No chromatic aberration either.
Jun 7, 2014 08:55:31 #
So - there we have it! I am happy to be a M43 pioneer, with my Panny G1 and G2. I think Panny went backwards with the 14-42 kit lens, which replaced the 14-45 kit lens supplied with the G1. However, as an amateur, I am so happy with the 14-45 and 45-200. Just to remind the uninitiated - that means 35mm equivalent 28-400. With the two (lightweight) bodies I never have to change lenses. The EVFs are so good that I forget they are mirrorless and electronic! That is until they magnify the image for manual focus! It is likely that the two bodies and two lenses can now be bought on EBay for about $600 total. And probably only had amateur usage! Yes - M43 continues to move forward - DSLR cannot compete much longer.
Jun 7, 2014 08:59:22 #
I recently purchased a Fuji X 100. Light, good looking and fun to use but it takes awhile to figure it out. So far, it seems to be able to do a lot and has a built in flash and ND filter. Really like Fuji's optical/electronic viewfinder. Still experimenting.
Jun 7, 2014 09:21:47 #
Jun 7, 2014 09:25:03 #
amehta wrote:
Just watched it. I'll have to watch some of his other videos, because if I judge him on this, it's not good.
I don't have anything against mirrorless except that I haven't found an EVF I really like. If the OM-D E-M1 was available for $800 instead of $1000 at the link Cdouthitt posted, I might even have gotten it (lukan is laughing right now!). But I'm also not ready to say that mirrorless is better than DSLRs.
I don't have anything against mirrorless except that I haven't found an EVF I really like. If the OM-D E-M1 was available for $800 instead of $1000 at the link Cdouthitt posted, I might even have gotten it (lukan is laughing right now!). But I'm also not ready to say that mirrorless is better than DSLRs.
Just try the EVF on the Fuji XT1, and you will be converted. IMHO it is better than an optical viewfinder, - way better.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.