Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
micro nikkon 105mm??
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 22, 2014 14:15:02   #
redhogbill Loc: antelope, calif
 
the few days I have learned about sigma's "outlet" section of there store and Nikons "refurbished" lenses, {of course someone on UHH and mentioned about" refurbished " so I did some investigating, that led to shopping!! now I have a refurbished af-s micro nikkor 105mm 1:2.8 g ed lens, I received it this morning took a couple quik pics, I like it!
, it was $300.00 of retail. any advise or information about this lens {sure I will learn more over the next couple months}

Reply
May 22, 2014 14:40:55   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Best advice is to get out and use it!

Reply
May 22, 2014 14:56:19   #
CharlesA Loc: New Jersey
 
There's a ton of information about that lens in this thread:

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-209211-1.html

Charles

Reply
 
 
May 22, 2014 15:14:11   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
It is an extremely good lens. Your can use it for portraits, close up and macro. Macro and close ups consider using a flash. Good luck.

Reply
May 22, 2014 15:42:44   #
jschilds1 Loc: raleigh nc
 
sweet spot on mine is f8. sharpest lens i own

Reply
May 22, 2014 16:00:36   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
I use this lens weekly, as do several other macro-photographers on the Hog. I invite you to drop by the True Macro-Photography Forum at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-102-1.html The Macro Forum is the section to ask your questions about macro equipment and macro technique.

Reply
May 22, 2014 16:38:27   #
redhogbill Loc: antelope, calif
 
beautiful!!! thanks you

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
May 23, 2014 06:25:12   #
lone ranger Loc: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
 
I have owned my Nikon 105 2.8MM lens since 2007, and I"ve taken many wonderful macro shots with it, I would advise you to get the Nikon 1.4 Tele converter to go with that lens, you wont have to get as close to a subject, and you will only lose 1 stop of light, and get spectacular results, check out this photo, I took useing this combo......

This is one of my favorite shots of a dragon fly, the quality of the Nikon 105 2.8 Macro and the Nikon Tele 1.4 truly will give you wonderful results
This is one of my favorite shots of  a dragon fly,...

Reply
May 23, 2014 06:45:49   #
Boone Loc: Groundhog Town USA
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Best advice is to get out and use it!


:thumbup: :thumbup: Boone.

Reply
May 23, 2014 06:47:35   #
lone ranger Loc: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
 
Thanks for your kind words!!
redhogbill wrote:
beautiful!!! thanks you

Reply
May 23, 2014 09:02:23   #
redhogbill Loc: antelope, calif
 
beautiful shot! will consider....do you think the 2x would be to much? also i put a 36mm macro tube on yesterday and able to get in very close, so do you subtract the 36mm from the 105mm to get an evective focus of 69mm? i think i stated that right


lone ranger wrote:
I have owned my Nikon 105 2.8MM lens since 2007, and I"ve taken many wonderful macro shots with it, I would advise you to get the Nikon 1.4 Tele converter to go with that lens, you wont have to get as close to a subject, and you will only lose 1 stop of light, and get spectacular results, check out this photo, I took useing this combo......

Reply
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
May 23, 2014 10:53:21   #
lone ranger Loc: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
 
I own the 2X tele which I use primarly for my Nikon 70-200MM 2.8 Zoom, to give me more reach, the 2X tele gives me 400MM, but with the loss of 2 F stops of light, I"m waiting for the new Nikon 1.4 tele version 3 whiich goes on sale on the 28th of this month,and you will only lose 1 F stop of light, which in my opinion is a pretty good trade off.... I truly believe, its the right tele for Macro shots, I previously owned the version 2 which I sold, as version 3 is way better, look for it either on Amazon or B &H photo..........
redhogbill wrote:
beautiful shot! will consider....do you think the 2x would be to much? also i put a 36mm macro tube on yesterday and able to get in very close, so do you subtract the 36mm from the 105mm to get an evective focus of 69mm? i think i stated that right

Reply
May 23, 2014 10:55:26   #
lone ranger Loc: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
 
lone ranger wrote:
I own the 2X tele which I use primarly for my Nikon 70-200MM 2.8 Zoom, to give me more reach, the 2X tele gives me 400MM, but with the loss of 2 F stops of light, I"m waiting for the new Nikon 1.4 tele version 3 whiich goes on sale on the 28th of this month,and you will only lose 1 F stop of light, which in my opinion is a pretty good trade off.... I truly believe, its the right tele for Macro shots, I previously owned the version 2 which I sold, as version 3 is way better, look for it either on Amazon or B &H photo..........
I own the 2X tele which I use primarly for my Niko... (show quote)

Reply
May 23, 2014 10:56:26   #
lone ranger Loc: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
 
I"ve never used extension tubes, but I believe you are correct, besides, once you get your Nikon Tele, you can put those extension tubes, away for good.....

Reply
May 23, 2014 11:22:46   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Best advice is to get out and use it!


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.