Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D7000 versus D7100
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
May 20, 2014 15:16:51   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
I presently own a Nikon D7000 (purchased in April 2010) and have been toying with the idea of selling or trading it and "upgrading" to the D7100. Not sure if this is a wise move.
My D7000 is in mint condition as it has "very little mileage" on it. With a D7100 I can keep my existing 3 lenses.

Reply
May 20, 2014 15:24:21   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
I presently own a Nikon D7000 (purchased in April 2010) and have been toying with idea of selling or trading it and "upgrading" to the D7100. Not sure if this is a wise move.
My D7000 is in mint condition as it has "very little mileage" on it. With a D7100 I can keep my existing 3 lenses.


Yes, any lens that works on the D7000 will work on the D7100. There are comparisons of the two cameras on the internet so you can see what is upgraded and whether it's worth it for you.

Reply
May 20, 2014 15:25:04   #
GPS Phil Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
I presently own a Nikon D7000 (purchased in April 2010) and have been toying with idea of selling or trading it and "upgrading" to the D7100. Not sure is this is a wise move.
My D7000 is in mint condition as it has "very little mileage" on it. With a D7100 I can keep my existing 3 lenses.


If it doesn't break the budget, I would suggest keeping the D7000 for a back up. I have both and use both on a regular basis. While the D7100 is an upgrade from the D7000 it is a hugh upgrade. Different sensor, different focus system no AA filter, HD capable, the list is long. Go for it!

Phil

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2014 15:31:56   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
Phil, I am glad to hear you have both the D7000 and D7100. I may just take your advice.

Reply
May 20, 2014 15:45:44   #
GPS Phil Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
Phil, I am glad to hear you have both the D7000 and D7100. I may just take your advice.


I have about 10 lenses, and there are times when you find yourself changing lenses more than you should. The D7000 is such a bullit proof camera and I could not bring myself to part with it. I'm so glad I didn't, I keep the 16-85 Nikon lens on it 90% of the time which makes it my every day camera, leaving the D7100 for things like Macro, and telephoto work. Have to admit that I also dream up reasons for more equipment :lol:

Reply
May 20, 2014 17:05:02   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
I presently own a Nikon D7000 (purchased in April 2010) and have been toying with the idea of selling or trading it and "upgrading" to the D7100. Not sure if this is a wise move.
My D7000 is in mint condition as it has "very little mileage" on it. With a D7100 I can keep my existing 3 lenses.

I think the key to all this is "very little mileage". Just put more mileage on your D7000, and don't worry about the D7100 or a backup.

Reply
May 20, 2014 18:33:39   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
ecobin wrote:
Yes, any lens that works on the D7000 will work on the D7100. There are comparisons of the two cameras on the internet so you can see what is upgraded and whether it's worth it for you.


That is the way I would go. Every since film days I have always had at least to cameras. I don't like to change lenses outside for fear of dust on sensor. At Weddings there is not time. - Dave

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2014 20:34:51   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
That is the way I would go. Every since film days I have always had at least to cameras. I don't like to change lenses outside for fear of dust on sensor. At Weddings there is not time. - Dave


This is what I do on vacation. I have a wide angle on my D7000 and the 28-300 on my D800.

Reply
May 20, 2014 21:23:55   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
Steve, you have both a DX and a FX camera. Real nice. I thought about unloading all my DX gear and going the FX route but we are talking big bucks, here. I'm in my 70s and will not live long enough to enjoy this major change. So I guess it is best I do a simple upgrade to the Nikon D7100 and perhaps keep the D7000. The lowest price I have seen for the D7100 (body only) is $919 at B&H Photo in New York. The highest is $1,196 (can't recall where).

Reply
May 20, 2014 21:37:43   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
Steve, you have both a DX and a FX camera. Real nice. I thought about unloading all my DX gear and going the FX route but we are talking big bucks, here. I'm in my 70s and will not live long enough to enjoy this major change. So I guess it is best I do a simple upgrade to the Nikon D7100 and perhaps keep the D7000. The lowest price I have seen for the D7100 (body only) is $919 at B&H Photo in New York. The highest is $1,196 (can't recall where).


That's one reason that I bought fx lenses even for my D7000.

Reply
May 20, 2014 21:56:02   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
Steve, I was told it makes no sense to install a DX lens on a FX camera. But apparently, it is OK to attach an FX lens on a DX camera. I don't know the optical physics involved but that's what I have been reading.

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2014 22:07:26   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
Steve, I was told it makes no sense to install a DX lens on a FX camera. But apparently, it is OK to attach an FX lens on a DX camera. I don't know the optical physics involved but that's what I have been reading.


It only makes sense if you have a DX lens in a size you need and don't have FX. But you are turning you FX camera into a DX. - Dave

Reply
May 20, 2014 22:29:09   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
I have a D7000, and after 2 years, have only used about 50% of its capabilities. I dont' think you can justify the move because the D7100 feature set is not that different.

Reply
May 20, 2014 23:22:44   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
I have a D7000, and after 2 years, have only used about 50% of its capabilities. I dont' think you can justify the move because the D7100 feature set is not that different.


You'd be moving up for the resolution. As far as feature set, the D7000 is a very advanced camera. When I got my D800 I found that there was quite a similarity. The focus system was the biggest difference.

Reply
May 20, 2014 23:32:19   #
cfhousler
 
I havebeen using my D7000 forabout 2 yrs, am very pleasedwith it in acomparison with my former D90. I was very upset with sveral out of focus shots untiol Doc told my eyes are weak and need to get specs. also at 82 yrs old i cant hold the camera as steady as once ago. however, i have used may cameras over the yrs ans the D7000 is the best and at my age it is the last. If you really learn how to use all the features you will get great shots.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.