Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Poll shows majority think our president is a liar.
Page <<first <prev 36 of 39 next> last>>
Apr 26, 2014 18:13:09   #
SBW
 
silver wrote:
you are the liar here.


If you would bother reading any of the supporting material for my assertions you would know that is not true. I am not the liar. But for you and your fellow libtards that is okay isn't it? You are pathetic.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 21:42:20   #
JimGuy
 
SBW wrote:
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the US military is larger than the rest of the world's put together. Where do you get this wild information? Or do you just as usual make stuff up and throw it out there. Once again you have told a lie. Just China's military by itself is three times the size of ours. Three times the size. Here is a list of the world's military by country and their size in man power. Since you are a Marxist I am sure that you were already aware of this. You really do hate our armed forces don't you. You sniveling idiot. What a liar.

Read this, that is if you can read>
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the U... (show quote)


Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft carriers, tanks, etc.
For example, the US has according to your wiki, over 4000 combat aircraft in comparison to the next on the list which is Russia with only 1510.

I suppose if we still fought wars hand to hand with swords and spears who has the most canon fodder would matter....but this is the 21st century.

According to this article the US spends as much as the rest of the world. So it doesnt spend more, it spends as much as the rest.
http://www.military1.com/army/article/402211-how-much-stronger-is-the-us-military-compared-with-the-next-strongest-power

China has less than 500 Type 99 tanks, that have just been developed, and are not even close to being as good as the Abrams. We have 8,700 Abrams.

We have 10 aircraft carriers. The good kind. Everyone else has 10. Combined. And they are mostly small ships that can launch helicopters.

There are 8,400 attack helicopters in the world. The U.S. has 6,400 of them.

So, as I said before a good place to start cutting spending would be the military budget.

Now go to your room.

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 21:47:48   #
marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA
 
[quote=JimGuy]
SBW wrote:
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the US military is larger than the rest of the world's put together. Where do you get this wild information? Or do you just as usual make stuff up and throw it out there. Once again you have told a lie. Just China's military by itself is three times the size of ours. Three times the size. Here is a list of the world's military by country and their size in man power. Since you are a Marxist I am sure that you were already aware of this. You really do hate our armed forces don't you. You sniveling idiot. What a liar.

Read this, that is if you can read>

Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft carriers, tanks, etc.
For example, the US has according to your wiki, over 4000 combate aircraft in comparison to the next on the list which is Russia with only 1510.

I suppose if we still fought wars hand to hand with swords and spears who has the most canon fodder would matter....but this is the 21st century.

According to this article the US spends as much as the rest of the world. So it doesnt spend more, it spends as much as the rest.
http://www.military1.com/army/article/402211-how-much-stronger-is-the-us-military-compared-with-the-next-strongest-power

China has less than 500 Type 99 tanks, that have just been developed, and are not even close to being as good as the Abrams. We have 8,700 Abrams.

We have 10 aircraft carriers. The good kind. Everyone else has 10. Combined. And they are mostly small ships that can launch helicopters.

There are 8,400 attack helicopters in the world. The U.S. has 6,400 of them.

So, as I said before a good place to start cutting spending would be the military budget.

Now go to your room.
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the U... (show quote)


Jimguy, well said!

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2014 03:26:33   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
SBW wrote:
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the US military is larger than the rest of the world's put together. Where do you get this wild information? Or do you just as usual make stuff up and throw it out there. Once again you have told a lie. Just China's military by itself is three times the size of ours. Three times the size. Here is a list of the world's military by country and their size in man power. Since you are a Marxist I am sure that you were already aware of this. You really do hate our armed forces don't you. You sniveling idiot. What a liar.

Read this, that is if you can read>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel
What bald faced liar you are. You state that the U... (show quote)


OH Who cares what you have to say. Go get a 200 pound of cheetos and stuff yourself.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 07:12:59   #
SBW
 
JimGuy wrote:
Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft carriers, tanks, etc.
For example, the US has according to your wiki, over 4000 combat aircraft in comparison to the next on the list which is Russia with only 1510.

I suppose if we still fought wars hand to hand with swords and spears who has the most canon fodder would matter....but this is the 21st century.

According to this article the US spends as much as the rest of the world. So it doesnt spend more, it spends as much as the rest.
http://www.military1.com/army/article/402211-how-much-stronger-is-the-us-military-compared-with-the-next-strongest-power

China has less than 500 Type 99 tanks, that have just been developed, and are not even close to being as good as the Abrams. We have 8,700 Abrams.

We have 10 aircraft carriers. The good kind. Everyone else has 10. Combined. And they are mostly small ships that can launch helicopters.

There are 8,400 attack helicopters in the world. The U.S. has 6,400 of them.

So, as I said before a good place to start cutting spending would be the military budget.

Now go to your room.
Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft c... (show quote)


You are clueless. What institution did you just escape from?

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 07:15:36   #
SBW
 
JimGuy wrote:
Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft carriers, tanks, etc.
For example, the US has according to your wiki, over 4000 combat aircraft in comparison to the next on the list which is Russia with only 1510.

I suppose if we still fought wars hand to hand with swords and spears who has the most canon fodder would matter....but this is the 21st century.

According to this article the US spends as much as the rest of the world. So it doesnt spend more, it spends as much as the rest.
http://www.military1.com/army/article/402211-how-much-stronger-is-the-us-military-compared-with-the-next-strongest-power

China has less than 500 Type 99 tanks, that have just been developed, and are not even close to being as good as the Abrams. We have 8,700 Abrams.

We have 10 aircraft carriers. The good kind. Everyone else has 10. Combined. And they are mostly small ships that can launch helicopters.

There are 8,400 attack helicopters in the world. The U.S. has 6,400 of them.

So, as I said before a good place to start cutting spending would be the military budget.

Now go to your room.
Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft c... (show quote)


This is the statement that you made. This statement is not true.

"So there will have to be some cuts. How about starting with our bloated military....the one thats already larger than all the forces in the rest of the world combined".

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 09:52:47   #
Budnjax Loc: NE Florida
 
Only 61% believe Obozo is a liar? Shows you just how incredibly ignorant 39% of the population must be. He's a compulsive liar and probably a psychopath as well.....then there's Moo-chelle....known around the White House as "Monster" due to her personality disorder, ranting and fits of uncontrollable rage (of course, being wed to Obozo might be a valid excuse for such behavior!)

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2014 13:23:12   #
marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA
 
Budnjax wrote:
Only 61% believe Obozo is a liar? Shows you just how incredibly ignorant 39% of the population must be. He's a compulsive liar and probably a psychopath as well.....then there's Moo-chelle....known around the White House as "Monster" due to her personality disorder, ranting and fits of uncontrollable rage (of course, being wed to Obozo might be a valid excuse for such behavior!)


Before you start calling people compulsive and psychopath you really need to understand what those terms really mean. I suspect you don't have a degree in psychology. Why can't we have civil discourse without it morphing into idiotic name calling and making remarks that just prove that you have no idea about what is really going on in the world.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 13:39:11   #
dljen Loc: Central PA
 
marblclear wrote:
Before you start calling people compulsive and psychopath you really need to understand what those terms really mean. I suspect you don't have a degree in psychology. Why can't we have civil discourse without it morphing into idiotic name calling and making remarks that just prove that you have no idea about what is really going on in the world.


Some don't know the difference between disagreeing and being disagreeable, this begins the name calling.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 13:59:13   #
marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA
 
dljen wrote:
Some don't know the difference between disagreeing and being disagreeable, this begins the name calling.


Well said.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 14:00:36   #
marblclear Loc: Sacramento CA
 
SBW wrote:
This is the statement that you made. This statement is not true.

"So there will have to be some cuts. How about starting with our bloated military....the one thats already larger than all the forces in the rest of the world combined".


You are splitting hairs.

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2014 16:06:32   #
JimGuy
 
SBW wrote:
This is the statement that you made. This statement is not true.

"So there will have to be some cuts. How about starting with our bloated military....the one thats already larger than all the forces in the rest of the world combined".


Ok, I was working from memory, making a point that the US spends too much on defense, and if budget cuts need to be made, that is where we need to start.

If you want to spit hairs, I should have said "nearly as large as the rest of the worlds combined". If you want to start counting ordinance and resources, Im guessing it would still be as large or larger than the rest.

It doesnt change the point, or the fact that we have more than we need already, and if the funds are to be spent, could be put to better use elsewhere...or just not spent at all.

"The U.S., for example, has 11 aircraft carriers in service; the rest of the world has eight. China is building one but analysts say it won’t be completed before 2015. “The United States,” notes the QDR, “remains the only nation to project and sustain large-scale operations over extended distances.”

"military spending and the cost of past wars have been swallowing up more than 40 percent of federal tax dollars"

You will like these links

Go ahead and split some more hairs

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/military-spending-cuts/u-s-military-spending-dwarfs-rest-world-n37461

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/defense-spending-fact-of-the-day_n_1746685.html

http://nation.time.com/2012/09/25/comparing-defense-budgets-apples-to-apples/

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/02/05/u-s-military-power-when-is-enough-enough/

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 16:50:50   #
SBW
 
marblclear wrote:
You are splitting hairs.


A lie is a lie you silly fool.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 16:51:41   #
SBW
 
marblclear wrote:
Well said.


Oh yeah, she could say it well. She has been one of the primary name callers on this site.

Reply
Apr 27, 2014 16:52:53   #
SBW
 
JimGuy wrote:
Ok, I was working from memory, making a point that the US spends too much on defense, and if budget cuts need to be made, that is where we need to start.

If you want to spit hairs, I should have said "nearly as large as the rest of the worlds combined". If you want to start counting ordinance and resources, Im guessing it would still be as large or larger than the rest.

It doesnt change the point, or the fact that we have more than we need already, and if the funds are to be spent, could be put to better use elsewhere...or just not spent at all.

"The U.S., for example, has 11 aircraft carriers in service; the rest of the world has eight. China is building one but analysts say it won’t be completed before 2015. “The United States,” notes the QDR, “remains the only nation to project and sustain large-scale operations over extended distances.”

"military spending and the cost of past wars have been swallowing up more than 40 percent of federal tax dollars"

You will like these links

Go ahead and split some more hairs

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/military-spending-cuts/u-s-military-spending-dwarfs-rest-world-n37461

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/defense-spending-fact-of-the-day_n_1746685.html

http://nation.time.com/2012/09/25/comparing-defense-budgets-apples-to-apples/

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/02/05/u-s-military-power-when-is-enough-enough/
Ok, I was working from memory, making a point that... (show quote)


You hate the US Military, don't you?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 36 of 39 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.