Read this treehuggers (Page 6): GOOOOOOD GRIEEEF.... its the battle of contradicting Links..... Keep it up it is interesting.. Mike...

venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.

GOOOOOOD GRIEEEF....

its the battle of contradicting Links.....

Keep it up it is interesting..

Mike

ted45 Loc: Delaware

frankeieio wrote:

I'm not sure where ted got his "expert" numbers from, but first it appears they are wrong by about 1/2 and second the world's oceans are now rising faster than they have in thousands of years. There will be implications...

http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/critical-issues-sea-level-rise/

The rise in ocean levels is due more to improved methods of measurement than actual rise in water level. There have only been estimates of how fast the oceans have risen or retreated in the earths history. If you believe the estimates at one time Machu Picchu was practically water front property.

The water is rising but it has been for thousands of years.

I am concerned. I live about 2 tenths of a mile from the bay. If it rises fast enough my rent will sky rocket.

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

bcheary wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2603961/Fracking-help-slow-global-warming-admit-UN-scientists-nuclear-power.html

Another hot button with the treehuggers. :-D

The Daily Mail is a right wing British "news paper". Notice the inverted commas. Most Brits treat it as a joke. The fact is that fracking is like giving yourself a champagne and peanut enema in the hope that you may pass a Rolex.

FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga

bcheary wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2603961/Fracking-help-slow-global-warming-admit-UN-scientists-nuclear-power.html

Another hot button with the treehuggers. :-D

And this one too .

http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/latest-data-shows-arctic-ice-volume-has-increased.html

frankeieio Loc: Bend, Oregon

You realize ted the link you posted to directly contradicts your claims of oceans rising for thousands of years

[While studies show that sea levels changed little from AD 0 until 1900, sea levels began to climb in the 20th century.]

... just sayin'.

ted45 wrote:

The rise in ocean levels is due more to improved m... (show quote)

ted45 Loc: Delaware

frankeieio wrote:

You realize ted the link you posted to directly contradicts your claims of oceans rising for thousands of years

[While studies show that sea levels changed little from AD 0 until 1900, sea levels began to climb in the 20th century.]

... just sayin'.

It seems too. However, what I said was they have risen and fallen. The link only covers from AD 0. There are thousands of years BC and geologists have been studying the fossil record of that period for a long time. At one time parts of the Mojave Dessert were under water. We have all heard of the land bridge connecting Alaska and Russia that is now underwater.

http://digital-desert.com/trona-pinnacles/

Woodie Rick

bcheary wrote:

The problem is that Obummer and his cohorts based a lot of their "green policy crap" on faulty data generated by UK scientists. A lot of that data has since been debunked by US and other worldwide scientists.

"Obummer and his cohorts" ?

"green policy crap" ?

"faulty data generated by UK scientists" ?

"debunked by US and other worldwide scientists" ?

Four items here that I would like clarification about. These are strong statements. I'm calling you out on each statement, none are accurate, the first one is just a mindless insult---maybe came from FAUX NEWS? Glen Beck? Rush? Hard to say, but it amounts to nothing more than a needless insult. List your sources for each of your above statements. Please, let us all in on your fountain of modern knowledge.

In the meantime

Thank the man

(Download)

Woodie Rick

Checkmate wrote:

Quit whining. We had too many years of attacks on conservatives and on the Tea Party caucus from you intolerant left-wingers. Guess you still believe in Santa Claus and Osama. Oops I meant Obama. Remember the only difference between Obama and Osama is the B & the S (BS). Have a nice Easter.

More rants, it is after all, all you have left. Keep your eyes on the polls over the next few months, I'm betting they will change in favor of the Democrats once again before the election, if for no other reason than you and your friends continuing the spewing forth of all this right-wing nonsense!

Here it is again, enjoy!

Thank the man

(Download)

mechengvic Loc: SoCalo

Woodie Rick wrote:

More rants, it is after all, all you have left. Keep your eyes on the polls over the next few months, I'm betting they will change in favor of the Democrats once again before the election, if for no other reason than you and your friends continuing the spewing forth of all this right-wing nonsense!

Here it is again, enjoy!

:thumbup: :D :thumbup: :-D :thumbup:

pigpen

Woodie Rick wrote:

More rants, it is after all, all you have left. Keep your eyes on the polls over the next few months, I'm betting they will change in favor of the Democrats once again before the election, if for no other reason than you and your friends continuing the spewing forth of all this right-wing nonsense!

Here it is again, enjoy!

That is a joke!!

First, let's pretend that's an actual number. The whole "goal" of Obamacare was to insure the 30 million people without insurance, not even close. Now we can truthfully disclose the facts about that number, 8 million. A large % of those people are those that have lost healthcare thanks to you idiots. I know. I'm one of them.

I went from having my coverage completely paid for by my employer, to now having to dish out an extra $175 a month. That's a big increase in monthly bills. So, as of Jan 1st, I will temporarilly be without healthcare. We started with 30 million uninsured. Can't wait to see how far we surpass that number. Of course that will just give the libs another excuse to implement more control, and you idiots will fall for it again.

So yes, let's all give BamBam a big thank you.

frankeieio Loc: Bend, Oregon

What is it you are trying to say then?

ted45 wrote:

It seems too. However, what I said was they have risen and fallen. The link only covers from AD 0. There are thousands of years BC and geologists have been studying the fossil record of that period for a long time. At one time parts of the Mojave Dessert were under water. We have all heard of the land bridge connecting Alaska and Russia that is now underwater.

http://digital-desert.com/trona-pinnacles/

BamaTexan Loc: Deep in the heart of Texas

DeanerNiker wrote:

Everyone should know the answer to this: It was animal farts!! :lol: :lol:

Dang, and I thought it was from Ogg, the Caveman's campfires...... :(

BamaTexan Loc: Deep in the heart of Texas

pigpen wrote:

That is a joke!! br br First, let's pretend that'... (show quote)

Dang, pigpen, you mean your insurance didn't drop by $2500 dollars like obama said it would?

BamaTexan Loc: Deep in the heart of Texas

madshad wrote:

nuclear is never safe because the plants are run by the imperfect humans!!!

Using that logic, NOTHING is safe!

ERRN54

Already issues in Wisconsin where the "special sand" that is needed for this safe process is mined. Respiratory issues (silica dust) and decimating the landscape! :thumbdown: :thumbdown: