Is this a Muskrat?
Mar 28, 2014 20:22:31 #
Mar 28, 2014 20:23:09 #
Mar 29, 2014 18:09:18 #
Yes, muskrat or nutria.
Every time I look at one of your shots, I covet the lens. It wasn't long ago I was happy with my point and shoot.
Every time I look at one of your shots, I covet the lens. It wasn't long ago I was happy with my point and shoot.
Mar 29, 2014 19:22:14 #
vicksart wrote:
Yes, muskrat or nutria.
Every time I look at one of your shots, I covet the lens. It wasn't long ago I was happy with my point and shoot.
Every time I look at one of your shots, I covet the lens. It wasn't long ago I was happy with my point and shoot.
Thank you, Vicki. Maybe some day you will have the Tamron 150-600mm lens. It's not that expensive for the quality that you receive and in your photos.
Mar 29, 2014 19:27:23 #
Regis wrote:
Thank you, Vicki. Maybe some day you will have the Tamron 150-600mm lens. It's not that expensive for the quality that you receive and in your photos.
I bought a 100-400 Canon 6 mos. ago. It would be hard to justify the redundancy except for the extra reach. I've also considered a 1.4 TC. I've been told I need to use my feet more and get closer. :-D
Mar 29, 2014 19:40:12 #
vicksart wrote:
I bought a 100-400 Canon 6 mos. ago. It would be hard to justify the redundancy except for the extra reach. I've also considered a 1.4 TC. I've been told I need to use my feet more and get closer. :-D
The Canon 100-400mm lens is one of the great and affordable ones to have. I just needed the extra reach to 600mm for my bird photography, but I can't compare the Tamron to the Canon since I never owned one. The critics say they are both great lenses. The Canon is lighter and shorter than the Tamron.
Mar 29, 2014 19:52:53 #
Mar 29, 2014 19:59:17 #
Mar 29, 2014 20:02:24 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.