Please critique. Did a bit of PP in LR5. Thanks
Saleavitt10 wrote:
Please critique. Did a bit of PP in LR5. Thanks
Nothing to critique as far as I am concerned. Good shot. :thumbup: :thumbup:
I like it! Neat face-on perspective and uncluttered surroundings. Must have been quite a thrill to see this handsome animal :)
You might have intended to put this in the critique section - names are similar.
Here are the guidelines for posting in analysis:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-19061-1.html
Great shot what type of fox is that?
braindamage wrote:
Great shot what type of fox is that?
Thanks. S/he is a gray fox. First one I've seen in my backyard. See red foxes on occasion.
Linda From Maine wrote:
I like it! Neat face-on perspective and uncluttered surroundings. Must have been quite a thrill to see this handsome animal :)
You might have intended to put this in the critique section - names are similar.
Here are the guidelines for posting in analysis:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-19061-1.htmlThanks Linda. Yes, did intend for it to go to the critique section.
Well...I'll give my critique.
1.) There isn't a part that's in focus...it's all blurry. (or camera shake...not sure.)
The eyes HAVE to be in focus at least. You will get folks who will disagree, I'm fine with that but you have to do it...if nothing is in focus..it's a throwaway. (OR is this just a massively cropped shot where the resolution makes it appear that nothing is in focus??)
2.) The snow background "seems" to have a slight PP vignette...not sure but it looks that way.
In my opinion, vignetting a white background doesn't look good...it makes the snow look dirty.
3.) The framing is "off"...he's got his foot just about out of the photo and LOTS of head room...a crop and "extend" might be in order.
That's what i see.
SonyA580
Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
I'm closer to agreeing with rpavich than the other posters. At first glance it's a cute shot but further examination shows blur due to?? Either the fox or the camera moved. The vignetting bothers me too. It's one of those near misses.
I agree with rpavich and sonya580, looks clean till you get up to 50% enlargement the starts looking like movement or focus. I personally would have gone for a greater DOF, but that's just a personal observation.
Nice. Looks fat and healthy.
rpavich wrote:
Well...I'll give my critique.
1.) There isn't a part that's in focus...it's all blurry. (or camera shake...not sure.)
The eyes HAVE to be in focus at least. You will get folks who will disagree, I'm fine with that but you have to do it...if nothing is in focus..it's a throwaway. (OR is this just a massively cropped shot where the resolution makes it appear that nothing is in focus??)
2.) The snow background "seems" to have a slight PP vignette...not sure but it looks that way.
In my opinion, vignetting a white background doesn't look good...it makes the snow look dirty.
3.) The framing is "off"...he's got his foot just about out of the photo and LOTS of head room...a crop and "extend" might be in order.
That's what i see.
Well...I'll give my critique. br br 1.) There isn... (
show quote)
Thanks for the feedback. It is cropped. I did play with vignetting in LR. The snow is actually quite dirty in the backyard right now! The fox was moving and I had to shoot this through a window. It was one of those situations where I had to just grab the camera and click or get nothing at all. I will go back into the original and play some more with your suggestions in mind.
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
SonyA580 wrote:
I'm closer to agreeing with rpavich than the other posters. At first glance it's a cute shot but further examination shows blur due to?? Either the fox or the camera moved. The vignetting bothers me too. It's one of those near misses.
Thanks for responding. I will go back to the original and try again!
Bill Houghton wrote:
I agree with rpavich and sonya580, looks clean till you get up to 50% enlargement the starts looking like movement or focus. I personally would have gone for a greater DOF, but that's just a personal observation.
I think the blur is mostly the amount of crop. It was shot through a window (no choice) and s/he was walking toward the house. It was a shock to see it in the first place so I just went with it!
Thanks for the comments.
Shooting thru a window makes it look soft..
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.