christofras wrote:
Come on WR, Nightsky would be the first to apologise to anyone
If she though an apology was needed....She has already done that!....Just pull your pin head in and allow her to proceed!
I have asked her to apologize for accusing me of trying to undermine her section and I'm sure you didn't mean your little pin head remark, did you?
winterrose wrote:
I have asked her to apologize for accusing me of trying to undermine her section and I'm sure you didn't mean your little pin head remark, did you?
I thought the terminology I used appropriate for your attack on someone who is trying to do a very difficult job , and getting very little support and encouragement for it!
christofras wrote:
I thought the terminology I used appropriate for your attack on someone who is trying to do a very difficult job , and getting very little support and encouragement for it!
Asking questions is not an attack, neither is defending against false accusations.
Nightski is wrong to say that I am trying to undermine "her" section. It is clearly in decline and if not for the artificial support of Nightski's regular contributers, would likely have ground to a halt.
It is inexorably headed toward being only a photographically oriented social site and if Nightski, her group, and Admin are happy with that then let them say so.
Then everybody, including myself, will be happy knowing what its purpose actually is.
Unfortunately no-one, not even Nightski, actually seems to know.
Rob.
winterrose wrote:
Asking questions is not an attack, neither is defending against false accusations.
Nightski is wrong to say that I am trying to undermine "her" section. It is clearly in decline and if not for the artificial support of Nightski's regular contributers, would likely have ground to a halt.
It is inexorably headed toward being only a photographically oriented social site and if Nightski, her group, and Admin are happy with that then let them say so.
Then everybody, including myself, will be happy knowing what its purpose actually is.
Unfortunately no-one, not even Nightski, actually seems to know.
Rob.
Asking questions is not an attack, neither is defe... (
show quote)
Your continued interjections in her pursuit to get things together needs to stop.Take step back and allow the process to evolve.
You seem to want to take over all the time! Just give her a fair go!.....Please!
winterrose wrote:
Asking questions is not an attack, neither is defending against false accusations.
Nightski is wrong to say that I am trying to undermine "her" section. It is clearly in decline and if not for the artificial support of Nightski's regular contributers, would likely have ground to a halt.
It is inexorably headed toward being only a photographically oriented social site and if Nightski, her group, and Admin are happy with that then let them say so.
Then everybody, including myself, will be happy knowing what its purpose actually is.
Unfortunately no-one, not even Nightski, actually seems to know.
Rob.
Asking questions is not an attack, neither is defe... (
show quote)
The thing is Rob, no one has to answer to you, no one has to apologise to you, no one has to give you an answer for anything regarding the PC&A group.
You have not earnt these things. In fact you have destroyed these things.
You have a damn nerve asking anyone for an apology for anything.
You have relegated your standing in the community to below the level of a cockroach.
Stop dribbling your crap, man up and take your situations on the chin, instead of twisting and inventing scenarios like a spoilt little brat.
lighthouse wrote:
The solution is even simpler.
Become a nice person and stop intimidating, abusing and targeting people, stop calling people names, stop talking down to people like they are idiots and lower class, and stop trying to undermine the PC&A section.
And your answer to this was to say "They deserve it!"
The ball is still in your court Rob.
You can choose which direction you take from here on in.
The decision is yours.
You can continue in the way you have been, or you can start treating people with respect.
lighthouse wrote:
And your answer to this was to say "They deserve it!"
The ball is still in your court Rob.
You can choose which direction you take from here on in.
The decision is yours.
You can continue in the way you have been, or you can start treating people with respect.
Whoa there! Wait just one doggone minute!
"And your answer to this was to say "They deserve it!""
Show me exactly from where, and in what context, you are quoting me.
lighthouse wrote:
And your answer to this was to say "They deserve it!"
The ball is still in your court Rob.
You can choose which direction you take from here on in.
The decision is yours.
You can continue in the way you have been, or you can start treating people with respect.
So in your world it is perfectly acceptable to throw around accusations and not expect to have to stand behind them.
You are as free with yours as you are limited in your acceptance of freedom of speech. You seem not to be capable of differentiation between valid questions, inquiries or opinion from harassment or bullying.
winterrose wrote:
Whoa there! Wait just one doggone minute!
"And your answer to this was to say "They deserve it!""
Show me exactly from where, and in what context, you are quoting me.
winterrose wrote:
If people act lower class and/or in an idiotic fashion is it not simple good manners to treat them according to their own standards? I would have thought so.
I only mirror abuse with that little bit added on.
........
Regards, Rob.
What is this about, lighthouse? Nothing to say?
The ball is still in your court Rob.
You can choose which direction you take from here on in.
The decision is yours.
You can continue in the way you have been, or you can start treating people with respect.
winterrose wrote:
What is this about, lighthouse? Nothing to say?
There was no need for me to add anything.
Your words said it all.
You asked me to show you exactly in what context I was quoting you ... so I did.
lighthouse wrote:
There was no need for me to add anything.
Your words said it all.
You asked me to show you exactly in what context I was quoting you ... so I did.
You have done no such thing. Show me exactly where I stated the words "They deserve it". For your edification, quotation marks specifically mean that you are referring to words verbatim. You are deliberately attempting to put words into my mouth.
winterrose wrote:
You have done no such thing. Show me exactly where I stated the words "They deserve it". For your edification, quotation marks specifically mean that you are referring to words verbatim. You are deliberately attempting to put words into my mouth.
Oh who gives a flying f@#% you drama queen.
They were your words.
We will let anyone silly enough to be still reading, to decide it for themselves.
Get over it and grow up.
Stop trying to avoid issues and muddy the waters by going off on a tangent (familiar tactic).
lighthouse wrote:
Oh who gives a flying f@#% you drama queen.
They were your words.
We will let anyone silly enough to be still reading, to decide it for themselves.
Get over it and grow up.
Stop trying to avoid issues and muddy the waters by going off on a tangent (familiar tactic).
Resorting to profanities now are we?
Predictable from one so affected.
Misquoting not good enough for you?
Show me.
The ball is in your court Rob.
The choice is yours.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.