Currently, there is another discussion on this site about "I don't do any post-processing, because I nail it perfectly in the camera". Frankly, I haven't met but maybe less than 1% of photos that couldn't stand a little bit of post processing work.

I'd like to see some examples from others that say they do 0 post-processing and there is absolutely nothing that could be better with their image...so the rule is, SOC (straight out of the camera) images only...no cropping, or white balance adjustments, cloning, etc.

Let's see some examples. Personally, I don't have any.

I always shoot RAW, since I first realized the additional potential these files have, and I always adjust my photos, usually in LR. So for this exercise I had to retrieve a day's photos from October when my OMD-EM5 had a mental breakdown and for that day would only shoot jpeg and could not be persuaded to do otherwise.

Here's 3 versions of the same photo shot in jpeg only
#1 - In-camera jpeg with default settings which in Olympus cameras do a pretty darned good job. However, there was fog, which diminished contrast, the combination of fog and shadow fooled the auto WB, and there wasn't enough detail in dark areas.
#2 - Above jpeg edited in LR with my normal LR preset to address lights/darks, contrast, clarity, then removed a couple of small distractions, adjusted WB, a couple of radial filters and sharpened.
#3 - Above jpeg edited in PS5 and NIK color efex . I wanted a more artsy version so cropped differently, added an Orton effect, more specific contrast adjustments, some color adjustments and some dodge/burn

I have no problem with anyone shooting with any camera, any settings, and any pp they prefer since that is what I do. But I enjoy the pp almost as much as taking photos, and that's where I really get to be more creative. And I cannot remember taking a photo that didn't benefit from a little something. Our cameras just don't see like our eyes do, and if I am to make a photo represent what I experienced, I need the pp tools to do it.

OK.....I'll bite. First of all, I was in the other thread. I never said I don't PP. I said, I don't do a lot of PP. I have no aversion to PP, but I take pictures for my enjoyment and a lot of what I take is "good enough" for me. I'm not looking for anyone to make either of these un-PP'd pictures better to show me I should PP more, though if you feel it's your "calling" to do so, knock yourself out. I'm not foolish enough to say my pictures couldn't benefit from PP. They're just often good enough for my needs. As an FYI, these were both shot with my Nikon D7100 and AFS-DX 35mm F1.8.