Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Professional Dress?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Mar 19, 2014 10:21:17   #
GlenW
 
Maybe a Kilt- If it's a Scottish or Irish wedding

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 10:21:24   #
GlenW
 
Maybe a Kilt- If it's a Scottish or Irish wedding

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 10:23:59   #
CurreyPhoto Loc: Reddick, Florida
 
W00F1 wrote:
About 90% of the time I wear black pants and a black shirt. I look at it as my "uniform." Most of the time I blend in with the crowd and still set apart as a person with a specific function at the event and guests often step aside for a moment to let me get my shot. That also gives me the range of motion that I want to have.


This is my standard dress also. I find a jacket and tie overly restrictive to the extent that it interfers with my work.

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Mar 19, 2014 10:26:28   #
Mormorazzi Loc: Temple, Texas
 
After shuffling through a pile of candid wedding photos many years ago and repeatedly saw a poorly and brightly dressed photographer in the background, I decided to think about my professional look. I do a lot of event photography and recently shot my first wedding.

I wear comfortable black slacks, sturdy Naot black shoes, a knit grey (18% grey, of course!) blouse and a thin-knit dark sweater that covers my derriere. I don't wear scarves or necklaces that will get in my way. I style my hair so it's out of my eyes. I also make sure my nails are done, as guests, inevitably, ask to see their photo on the LCD screen.

I don't want to miss a shot because of clothing restrictions. One more thing. If you look like "the" professional photographer and not a guest, people are more likely to move when you tell them you need the prime shooting position.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 10:52:52   #
Capture48 Loc: Arizona
 
georgeschroeder wrote:
Out of respect for my clients and myself, I dress up.


Out of respect for my clients I get the shot. Too many photographers think they are a guest at the wedding. You are not a guest, you're an employee. An employee that has only one function, get the shots. If that means laying or kneeling on the ground, I can do that and not worry about messing up a tux, or a suite.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:08:27   #
amyinsparta Loc: White county, TN
 
Did anyone ask the bride and groom what they thought? Maybe they didn't care what the photographers wore. If the bride and groom weren't concerned, then why should we be concerned?
just another way of looking at it.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:13:06   #
Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia
 
sandyjstimson wrote:
Recently I attended two events where professional photographers were hired. One was a wedding and the other a first communion. In each case the dress was 'Sunday Best". The audience were asked to not take photos. All went well, the parents and audience photographers were sneaky enough so they didn't bother their neighbors.

My concern has to do with the "dress" for the professional photographers. They wore jeans, Tee shirts and old tennis shoes. I have seen this often over the years. I realize professional photographers don't really make much money but it seems they should respect the settings and dress according to the situation. As a photographer myself ( amateur ) it was disappointing to see. It felt disrespectful.

Maybe I'm over reacting. I would appreciate you comments.
Recently I attended two events where professional ... (show quote)


I think this is a personal hang up. Get over it. "When will we stop judging people by how they look as opposed to the product of their work?" This underlying phenomenon translates to other stereotypes, bias and bigotry that stifles America. Just take a look look at not only how you perceive clothes but other attributes such as weight, hair color, skin etc? None of this is relevant.

As a photographer, you must also realize that you are bending, stretching, hustling from one spot to another that you must have clothing that is comfortable.

Final point. If you did not stipulate attire as a requirement in your written agreement, then it is your fault.

Reply
 
 
Mar 19, 2014 11:15:35   #
Capture48 Loc: Arizona
 
Mark7829 wrote:
I think this is a personal hang up. Get over it. "When will we stop judging people by how they look as opposed to the product of their work?" This underlying phenomenon translates to other stereotypes, bias and bigotry that stifles America. Just take a look look at not only how you perceive clothes but other attributes such as weight, hair color, skin etc? None of this is relevant.

As a photographer, you must also realize that you are bending, stretching, hustling from one spot to another that you must have clothing that is comfortable.

Final point. If you did not stipulate attire as a requirement in your written agreement, then it is your fault.
I think this is a personal hang up. Get over it. ... (show quote)


100% agree

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:18:52   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Mormorazzi wrote:
After shuffling through a pile of candid wedding photos many years ago and repeatedly saw a poorly and brightly dressed photographer in the background, I decided to think about my professional look. I do a lot of event photography and recently shot my first wedding.

I wear comfortable black slacks, sturdy Naot black shoes, a knit grey (18% grey, of course!) blouse and a thin-knit dark sweater that covers my derriere. I don't wear scarves or necklaces that will get in my way. I style my hair so it's out of my eyes. I also make sure my nails are done, as guests, inevitably, ask to see their photo on the LCD screen.

I don't want to miss a shot because of clothing restrictions. One more thing. If you look like "the" professional photographer and not a guest, people are more likely to move when you tell them you need the prime shooting position.
After shuffling through a pile of candid wedding p... (show quote)


I like the points you raise, and I'm sure you look good, and produce good work when you're shooting. Getting your nails done is a smart idea, and makes a very positive impression.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:22:55   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Mark7829 wrote:
I think this is a personal hang up. Get over it. "When will we stop judging people by how they look as opposed to the product of their work?" This underlying phenomenon translates to other stereotypes, bias and bigotry that stifles America. Just take a look look at not only how you perceive clothes but other attributes such as weight, hair color, skin etc? None of this is relevant.

As a photographer, you must also realize that you are bending, stretching, hustling from one spot to another that you must have clothing that is comfortable.

Final point. If you did not stipulate attire as a requirement in your written agreement, then it is your fault.
I think this is a personal hang up. Get over it. ... (show quote)


I think dress/ personal apprearance is relevant to the point that one shouldn't show up and look slovenly. Dress to fit the event you're shooting, to the degree that you're not standing out due to your attire/ personal presentation. You've got to be able to move to get the shot (bend, stoop, kneel, etc.) so it helps to dress appropriately but not look slovenly.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:33:29   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
boberic wrote:
Just noticed the title of this post. I don't think a male photographer has to wear a dress (a joke)

That would depend on the wedding - and the photographer. :D

Reply
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Mar 19, 2014 11:35:58   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
GlenW wrote:
Maybe a Kilt- If it's a Scottish or Irish wedding


Utilikilts are too casual.



Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:39:28   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Utilikilts are too casual.

Interesting. Probably not in the U. S.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 11:48:19   #
Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia
 
lukan wrote:
I think dress/ personal apprearance is relevant to the point that one shouldn't show up and look slovenly. Dress to fit the event you're shooting, to the degree that you're not standing out due to your attire/ personal presentation. You've got to be able to move to get the shot (bend, stoop, kneel, etc.) so it helps to dress appropriately but not look slovenly.


The originator did not use the term "SLOVENLY". Again that is your own personal garbage. Now you're interjecting terms and words that the originator did NOT use to describe. You make my point, we now are adding images and making judgement that do not apply. The originator did not say they were "dirty", or "acted inappropriately". In fact the originator made no mention of the quality of their work. And it's that what it is all about???

The most successful and innovative companies in this world do not worry about attire at all. Get pass the superficial and get to the heart of the matter - the photographs.

Reply
Mar 19, 2014 12:08:45   #
AlisonT Loc: Louisa, Virginia
 
As a female I can't photograph wearing a dress. I need to be able to move around and get down on my knees if needed. My standard attire for events is nice black jeans and a white Oxford shirt with clean black tennis shoes. That allows me to fade into the background and still look professional. I've not done any extremely formal events but if I did, I would first check with the hiring person to make sure what I plan on wearing would be okay.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.