Could these have been imprved by CPL filter or different settings??? Tips and suggestion Welcome!!!!!!
Taken from canoe, rather shy pair..
He was very protective of her....
Big snapper checking us out....
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
No, IMO a CPL wouldn't have done anything here - the reflections you got on #1 and #2 add to the shots. A CPL might have done a little bit to make more of the turtle visible through the water, though.
Question - why are you shooting at ISO 800 in what appears to be broad daylight, with no real reason to bump it up?
You raise the ISO in LOW LIGHT situations where a higher sensitivity allows you to keep the shutter speed quick to freeze action. None of these shots have much action, and they're in broad daylight.
??
JimH wrote:
No, IMO a CPL wouldn't have done anything here - the reflections you got on #1 and #2 add to the shots. A CPL might have done a little bit to make more of the turtle visible through the water, though.
Question - why are you shooting at ISO 800 in what appears to be broad daylight, with no real reason to bump it up?
You raise the ISO in LOW LIGHT situations where a higher sensitivity allows you to keep the shutter speed quick to freeze action. None of these shots have much action, and they're in broad daylight.
??
No, IMO a CPL wouldn't have done anything here - t... (
show quote)
thank you!!! that is what I am looking for!!!! These were taken with very little understanding of camera settings... I will do better now..would ISO of 200??? been better?? appreciate your input!!!!!
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
Bunny-Jean wrote:
thank you!!! that is what I am looking for!!!! These were taken with very little understanding of camera settings... I will do better now..would ISO of 200??? been better?
If you haven't already, take a peek at the Lens Primer noted in my signature. It's for beginning beginners who have just begun, and it looks like you may qualify.. :)
The only problem with using a high ISO like 800 in broad sunny daylight is that it introduces digital noise and graininess. I can't believe your camera would have done this automatically, so I can only assume that you set it on purpose.
Adjusting ISO upwards is done in low-light situations where you want to use a fast shutter speed to capture action - for example, in an indoor gymnasium where the lighting may not be very good, and you can't use flash. Setting a higher ISO increases the sensitivity of the camera, letting you keep a high shutter speed to capture action.
There is a triangular relationship between Shutter Speed, Aperture Setting, and ISO that affects all pictures.
JimH wrote:
Bunny-Jean wrote:
thank you!!! that is what I am looking for!!!! These were taken with very little understanding of camera settings... I will do better now..would ISO of 200??? been better?
If you haven't already, take a peek at the Lens Primer noted in my signature. It's for beginning beginners who have just begun, and it looks like you may qualify.. :)
The only problem with using a high ISO like 800 in broad sunny daylight is that it introduces digital noise and graininess. I can't believe your camera would have done this automatically, so I can only assume that you set it on purpose.
Adjusting ISO upwards is done in low-light situations where you want to use a fast shutter speed to capture action - for example, in an indoor gymnasium where the lighting may not be very good, and you can't use flash. Setting a higher ISO increases the sensitivity of the camera, letting you keep a high shutter speed to capture action.
There is a triangular relationship between Shutter Speed, Aperture Setting, and ISO that affects all pictures.
quote=Bunny-Jean thank you!!! that is what I am l... (
show quote)
thank you!!! I looked and copied for a reference, hope that is ok???? things are starting to click for me..... (7 types of learning and still not sure which I am yet, except slow!!!!) thanks again!!!!
Bunny-Jean wrote:
Could these have been imprved by CPL filter or different settings??? Tips and suggestion Welcome!!!!!!
To me these are perfect anyway. Good job
Ian
ianhargraves1066 wrote:
Bunny-Jean wrote:
Could these have been imprved by CPL filter or different settings??? Tips and suggestion Welcome!!!!!!
To me these are perfect anyway. Good job
Ian
Thanks Ian, for the nice compliment!!!
Bunny-Jean wrote:
Could these have been imprved by CPL filter or different settings??? Tips and suggestion Welcome!!!!!!
I like them Practice read manual practice read manual etc. It will come just fine
jdeanb wrote:
Bunny-Jean wrote:
Could these have been imprved by CPL filter or different settings??? Tips and suggestion Welcome!!!!!!
I like them Practice read manual practice read manual etc. It will come just fine
thank you! I am practicing,,,reading the manual sucks for me, I think (I am a visual learner) and understand better when someone breaks it down so I can understand, not a techie here. Most help for me has been this forum, taking some classes at the tech college and now a book called Nikon D90 by Corey Hilz, I am finally starting to know the stuff that is going to make my photos better....thanks so much for looking and the encouragement!!!!
My suggestion is not to shoot from a canoe-dangerous for the equipment! Hope you had protection for the gear, but on the plus side you get angles you wouldn't from the shore.
daplight wrote:
My suggestion is not to shoot from a canoe-dangerous for the equipment! Hope you had protection for the gear, but on the plus side you get angles you wouldn't from the shore.
Thanks, but I am very careful with equipment...check weather and water before going out.....future pure is going to be waterproof housing...
Bunny, Did you play with the color brightness on pix 1&2
wolfman43 wrote:
Bunny, Did you play with the color brightness on pix 1&2
No, they were to stinkin bright because I was pretty clueless about my camera settings! Was just learning to do manual, ( from the feedback I got, and everything I have learned on this forum ) Would certainly bring my Iso down alot. Hoping I will get a chance again this summer... Did you check out the Picasa edotor???
I just imagine that the sun was just as bright as it appears in the 1st two photos, which makes them very realistic! Great shots!
Would have used a smaller number aperture setting (your f/#) and spot-focused on the ducks in an attempt to blur the background more to separate or isolate the ducks from it.
Still, good work ya got there. :-)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.