Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
liberals with guns....
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Dec 30, 2013 08:04:38   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
deleted

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:06:53   #
izzyandal Loc: Hilton Head Island
 
Amen to that. I commanded a unit of the 14th Armored Cavalry at a time when we knew what the bad guys looked like. Those who serve, these days, never know from what side they are going to be hit.

The redneck in that video is too stupid to know anything .

I am one of those libberalls (SIC) who love our nation and own many handguns, rifles and a few shotguns.

My boss, Dwight David Eisenhower warned us about the military/industrial complex.

Here is my final word..."When fascism comes to this nation, it will be waving a flag and carrying a bible.

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:08:55   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
It appears from a search that this guy is a bit short on the facts of the political affiliations of those shooters...it seems to have started with Roger Hedgecock and spread from there.

While good for starting forest fire discussions...it seems to be false on that particular count.

Reply
 
 
Dec 30, 2013 08:15:10   #
Lmarc Loc: Ojojona, Honduras
 
Jade Warrior wrote:
Not being an American I usually stay out of debates about American politics (Democrats vs. Republicans) but as the stated intent of this post was to shit stir, this site might provide pause for reflection:

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that-recent-mass-shooters-are-mostly-registered-democrats-is-a-myth


Might want to find a better source of information. This is from Wikipedia, with references at the site:

Matt Smith of the San Francisco Weekly noted in 2007 that numerous articles and photos by Sharon Gray were from other sources, including the Sacramento Bee, and constituted apparent plagiarism." When questioned, Jim Pimental, executive editor of Examiner said,

"They're blogs. They don't get edited. We don't give any direction to people on what to write in their blogs. And that's standard operating procedure."

Pimentel said the Examiner has "a less-strict standard for accuracy and attribution in stories that appear on the Web" than for publications in print.

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:16:22   #
izzyandal Loc: Hilton Head Island
 
Folks of that mindset are not, easily, confused by facts.
Nice try and well-meaning you are afflicted with logical thinking.

Attaboy !

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:21:05   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
izzyandal wrote:
Folks of that mindset are not, easily, confused by facts.
Nice try and well-meaning you are afflicted with logical thinking.

Attaboy !


Well...painting all conservatives with the same broad brush is as bad as the reverse...something you complained about a few posts up...lol...
Nothing like getting caught doing exactly what you accuse others of doing.. :)

The fact is....there are nimrods who can't think logically on either side of the aisle...

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:31:32   #
izzyandal Loc: Hilton Head Island
 
Any sweeping generalization, is flawed.

A true conservative is not T party material.

The T folks, I know are haters of blacks...... I belong to three gun clubs and I know that type, up close and personal .

Reply
 
 
Dec 30, 2013 08:36:51   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
izzyandal wrote:
Any sweeping generalization, is flawed.

A true conservative is not T party material.

The T folks, I know are haters of blacks...... I belong to three gun clubs and I know that type, up close and personal .


A simple "whoops" would have been sufficient. :)

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:42:02   #
izzyandal Loc: Hilton Head Island
 
This thread has reached being ad nauseum and ad infinitum.

May the Force be with you for a happy and healthy New Year.

Expect no further response from me.

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:46:32   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
izzyandal wrote:
This thread has reached being ad nauseum and ad infinitum.

May the Force be with you for a happy and healthy New Year.

Expect no further response from me.


Lol...I've noticed on the 'hog two things:

1.) When one gets called out on their inconsistency and can't just squeak out a "whoops"....they deem the thread not worth further discussion...and hence say "I won't be back to waste my time with this....


2.) When they do #1...they usually come back....at least once. :)

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 08:59:50   #
sourdough58 Loc: Maine
 
izzyandal wrote:
Any sweeping generalization, is flawed.

A true conservative is not T party material.

The T folks, I know are haters of blacks...... I belong to three gun clubs and I know that type, up close and personal .


You said "Any sweeping generalization, is flawed." and then you made two sweeping generalizations.

Reply
 
 
Dec 30, 2013 09:00:33   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
sourdough58 wrote:
You said "Any sweeping generalization, is flawed." and then you made two sweeping generalizations.


classic.....simply classic...

good catch.

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 09:11:09   #
richard-sports Loc: New York City
 
Jade Warrior wrote:
Not being an American I usually stay out of debates about American politics (Democrats vs. Republicans) but as the stated intent of this post was to shit stir, this site might provide pause for reflection:

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that-recent-mass-shooters-are-mostly-registered-democrats-is-a-myth


All of you UHH fascists should read the above article before spouting your lunacy. The idiot from the you tube videos could not be more off base and idiotic.

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 09:12:08   #
Indepen
 
OK, maybe not stupid. but certainly moronic

Reply
Dec 30, 2013 09:21:09   #
madshad Loc: upstate new york
 
love the post made my day!!!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.