There have been many posts that deal with the need for neutral density filters in certain situations. I understand what they are used for and why they are needed, but what density do most people in this forum use? When I researched them, I found many for sale ranging from ND 2 to ND 400. Any suggestions? And thanx in advance.
I had a difficult time with that, too. Couldn't get any information on it, so I went halfway and got good glass. One thing I can tell you for sure, don't forget to take it off when you come inside! :roll:
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
ND filters come that way so you can buy a couple or three, and mix/match them for even more. For example, if you get a #2, a #4 and a #8, you can actually, through stacking, get these variations:
#2
#4
#2+#4
#8
#2+#8
#4+#8
#2+#4+#8
Granted, you'll lose a ton of light by the time you have a 4 and 8 stacked up but that's what they're for, right?
That's a thought. But don't you run the risk of some refraction when you start stacking filters? I tried stacking a UV and a circular polarizing filter and the picture didn't seem very sharp, plus I got a little flare in there.
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
cybermomm wrote:
That's a thought. But don't you run the risk of some refraction when you start stacking filters? I tried stacking a UV and a circular polarizing filter and the picture didn't seem very sharp, plus I got a little flare in there.
It's possible, I suppose, but there's a difference between a UV and a Polarizer being stacked, and two basically dark pieces of glass, as ND filters are. Like I said, I haven't really had the opp'ty to use a #4 and a #8 recently, but I know it can be done.
the brightness and contrast of the scene will/should dictate what nd filter you use..
Now that was an education on ND filters...thanks Bob
There was also a mention of sensor elements heating up during long time exposures in a DSL which I'm going to investigate and maybe bring this up in another thread.
bobmielke wrote:
http://www.redbubble.com/people/peterh111/journal/4421304-the-ultimate-easy-guide-to-neutral-density-filters
From my understanding these filters are to decrease your exposure and or limit depth. I think a nd2 nd4 nd6 and nd8 are equal to 2 4 6 and 8 stops of light.They can be used according to the amount of exposure,or aperture you choose.
Sorry, I meant according to amount of exposure you want.
I use ND filters a lot. I have the 2,4,8 and I will stack them to get 30 second exposures. I have an increase in the small details of the phot being enhanced. If you look at the link I have below, the frog is a 30 second exposure with all three of the ND's stacked on CP and UV filters.
ND filters are helpful to blur movement (i.e. water is the most common).
ND 4 is most common and it gives 2 stops.
I would encourage you to keep using it and with a CP and UV.
I am lost here. As I looked for ND filtes on Amazon, for my 58mm lens, they only show as .3, .6 and .9. How do these relate to the 2 to 400 NDs talked about here. Thanks for any clarification.
JimH
Loc: Western South Jersey, USA
Yeah, ND filters are described in one of two different nomenclatures. I just lifted this chart from Wikipedia. Hope it helps.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.