Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
High Dynamic Range (HDR)
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 25, 2013 08:21:29   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
PCity wrote:
Some Nikon DSLRs have an HDR feature where high contrast scenes exist, whereby 2 pictures are shot, with a resulting 3rd picture that combines the lighting affects of both. Its use is better supported by shooting on a tripod, as you look to have both shots shooting the same exact scene. I've seen examples of its usage, and its impressive.

My questions are : (1) Have any hogs made personal use of the feature, and are you happy with the results, and (2) if not making use of a tripod (hand holding), does the feature have any real benefit.....as you would need really steady hands to get the results you are looking for.

Looking forward to your feedback
Some Nikon DSLRs have an HDR feature where high co... (show quote)

When I want real HDR, I do it manually, with 3-5 shots of varying exposure.

I have a Sony WX9 P&S that automatically does a sort of HDR when it thinks it's necessary. It will take two or three shots and give me the best image that it can.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 09:10:30   #
Peter Boyd Loc: Blyth nr. Newcastle U.K.
 
BboH wrote:
What I find interesting is the number of responses suggesting this or that PP program to merge the images when the question was about the IN-CAMERA feature.....
Am I missing something?


No, you're not, its just another example of people going 'off-piste' with their replies.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 09:34:43   #
Dlevon Loc: New Jersey
 
cyclespeed wrote:
Yes and yes. I have used the feature and with decent results. The key as you suggest is the tripod. No one I know who has tried the feature has had steady hands even when using the poor mans tripod of string from tripod screw to foot on ground pulled snugly. Without exact duplicate compositions the resulting image is disappointing.


Agree, have to use a tripod.. I tried HDR and don't particularly like it. Is an opinion!

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2013 09:49:03   #
13oct1931 Loc: Lebanon, Indiana
 
Picasa (photo process program) has an "HDR-ish" button; it works pretty well. It has saved more than one pic for me.
Alyn
P.S. I have touted the Olympus SP800 UZ for some time now. Found out a couple of days ago that it is NO LONGER IN PRODUCTION. Sad ! Could someone please play "Taps?"

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 10:19:04   #
dsturr
 
BboH wrote:
What I find interesting is the number of responses suggesting this or that PP program to merge the images when the question was about the IN-CAMERA feature.....
Am I missing something?


No. The question could be "Are you Canadian or American" and at least one reply would be "It's raining outside."

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 10:29:06   #
dynaquest1 Loc: Austin, Texas
 
Is a tripod the best method for multiple exposure HDR? You bet! Can you take great HDR images without a tripod? You bet. If you hold your camera steady (like we all have been taught to do) and have good available light, Photomatix will align slightly off axis images to great result. See two below that were hand held shots. (D700/Mode:A/ISO:Auto Off).

Note alignment of tree branches and grass strands.





Reply
Nov 25, 2013 10:44:08   #
MW
 
I have tried the in camera HDR feature on a Canon S100 and on a Nikon D5100. Output is JPEG. It works kind of ok, but I wasn't very excited about it. Maybe it's just the thing for an emergency where need the photo to record or document an event and image quality is secondary.

Both cameras had some alignment capability so hand held is possible but tripod is better. But it seems to me that if one is willing to mess around with a tripod you might as well take the bracketed shots in RAW and process them later in some one of the HDR applications.

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2013 11:34:59   #
shieldsadvert
 
I have a Sony nex-6 with auto HDR. The feature works well if you have a short exposure. My advice: up the ISO so you can shoot at the reciprocal of the lens focal length and brace the camera, then shoot the scene multiple times.
bill

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 11:38:46   #
tiphareth51 Loc: Somewhere near North Pole, Alaska
 
I have used HDR to photograph ice sculptures with astonishing results. Yes, I do use a tripod as it is impossible to hand hold for the 3 shots to be taken. Even a minimal movement from breathing can impact the shots. It is good to know other photographers are also using the HDR process.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 12:32:46   #
Meives Loc: FORT LAUDERDALE
 
BboH wrote:
What I find interesting is the number of responses suggesting this or that PP program to merge the images when the question was about the IN-CAMERA feature.....
Am I missing something?


You should include the statement so that we know who you are talking to? I agree with you about the in camera HDR. I was thinking the in camera was taking the 3 or 5 picture bracket with different exposure and then using software to combine them. I phones do them in camera, but I did not know that cameras did them in camera. David

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 13:35:25   #
upnorthbob Loc: Wisconsin
 
Real photographers use tripods! :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2013 15:35:59   #
G Brown Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
 
HDR is usually used when you are taking a certain kind of picture eg indoors with a bright window or veranda that you want to include or a night shot where a light fools your camera into a too quick an exposure to capture detail. It can be used to bring out detail in white clouds without darkening the rest of the scene. Often HDR is used to 'create' a picture that has an unnatural range of colours rather than light. Its a matter of taste and degree. Better to know why you want the effect rather than shooting randomly for the effect in my opinion.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 16:29:30   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
cthahn wrote:
A tripod must be used. You are combining multiple pictures of the same photo files. They can not be different. The only way is to use a tripod. You can not hand hold two or more photos and expect them to be identical, except for exposure.


Well, I use the two-shot HDR handheld on my D800 all the time and don't have a problem with getting reasonable results. I don't see it as any different than image stabilization. I'm sure a tripod would help sharpness but that does not mean the handheld images aren't satisfactory.

On the other hand I don't find the results with it impressive. I have found Nikon's active D lighting does a better job in most instance I have tried. It does it's thing on one image.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 16:30:59   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
Meives wrote:
You should include the statement so that we know who you are talking to? I agree with you about the in camera HDR. I was thinking the in camera was taking the 3 or 5 picture bracket with different exposure and then using software to combine them. I phones do them in camera, but I did not know that cameras did them in camera. David


Nikon uses a two-shot in-camera HDR in both my D5100 and D800, and possibly others. My D7000 did not have it but I wouldn't be surprised to find that fixed in the D7100.

That is what the question was about.

Some other manufacturers now have 3 shot in-camera HDR with more controls. I suspect all will soon.

Reply
Nov 25, 2013 16:48:39   #
Uuglypher Loc: South Dakota (East River)
 
RaydancePhoto wrote:
All of my Sony's have HDR built in. I have shot lots of HDR photos with them almost all hand held. The Sony software does a wonderful job of combining the images in camera, even hand held at a relatively slow SS it works great.

RX-100
A-58
A-65


Amen!
Same goes for my
A55
A77, and
A99

Dave in SD

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.