Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Blonde hair highlighted on young girl
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Jan 9, 2012 11:53:22   #
trishrose Loc: Kountze,TX
 
I'm no pro , just my thoughts. I think the shot is fine, lighting not so fine, would love to see it played around with color and contrast. more sepia and brown tones with more light in face. It's all about learning and every technigue you try is a learning experience. I think most all photos are salvageable, maybe not sellable, but can definitely be something you can turn into a photo that you like. At my daughters wedding, there was a photo that was completely black, started to delete but something stopped me, i played and lightened and it was the est photo of the bunch, in my eyes, it captured a moment in time of two people, not knowing their photo was taken with a beautiful sunset behind them. ALL photos have something special-just play with them and you'll discover amazing things that you like-even if others don't. Your second photo, I like the pose, just maybe adjust the pink tint a bit is my thought.

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 11:58:30   #
rdbroman
 
trishrose wrote:
I'm no pro , just my thoughts. I think the shot is fine, lighting not so fine, would love to see it played around with color and contrast. more sepia and brown tones with more light in face. It's all about learning and every technigue you try is a learning experience. I think most all photos are salvageable, maybe not sellable, but can definitely be something you can turn into a photo that you like. At my daughters wedding, there was a photo that was completely black, started to delete but something stopped me, i played and lightened and it was the est photo of the bunch, in my eyes, it captured a moment in time of two people, not knowing their photo was taken with a beautiful sunset behind them. ALL photos have something special-just play with them and you'll discover amazing things that you like-even if others don't. Your second photo, I like the pose, just maybe adjust the pink tint a bit is my thought.
I'm no pro , just my thoughts. I think the shot is... (show quote)


thanks for the insight. I knew the lighting was off. I liked the positioning. That's why I submitted it for comment. I have done some adjustments regarding the lighting and think I have made it into a better picture.

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 13:53:06   #
Dryart38 Loc: Carlsbad, NM
 
rdbroman: I'll just stick to my initial opinion - the pix were delightful and wondefully candid - why complicate it!

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2012 14:38:12   #
rdbroman
 
Dryart38 wrote:
rdbroman: I'll just stick to my initial opinion - the pix were delightful and wondefully candid - why complicate it!


I was concerned primarily about light balance. I appreciate your comments. I too thought the picture itself was fine

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 15:57:52   #
Animal lover
 
I thought it was great. :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 18:52:54   #
Nikonfan70 Loc: Long Island
 
Go flickr And check out the backlit shots I made 40+ years ago.

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 18:53:34   #
Nikonfan70 Loc: Long Island
 
Sorry. My Handle is Chico195

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2012 17:29:47   #
fotogk Loc: Tuftonboro, NH
 
Did not read all six pages of response sorry if repeating, To help fix lighten if you put a winter green gel on flash and set white balance to florescent . when you are in editing program and correcting for color shift both light sources will be the same. If shooting inside always carry a winter green gel for florescent and CTO Color Temperature Orange for incandescent speeds up the post processing.

Reply
Jan 10, 2012 18:46:59   #
rdbroman
 
fotogk wrote:
Did not read all six pages of response sorry if repeating, To help fix lighten if you put a winter green gel on flash and set white balance to florescent . when you are in editing program and correcting for color shift both light sources will be the same. If shooting inside always carry a winter green gel for florescent and CTO Color Temperature Orange for incandescent speeds up the post processing.


Thanks for the tips. Hope others benefit as well.

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 00:01:19   #
voncook
 
It would be a much more powerful image if she had just raised her eyes to the lens

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 03:13:41   #
Guy Johnstone Loc: Ocean Shores WA
 
I think Captain C statement about the shutter speed he utilizes when using flash should be underscored. A higher shutter speed will underexpose the ambient lighting leaving you with a single strong source much cleaner. If left to their own devices (In some auto setting) most cameras will select a shutter speed of around 1/30th to 1/60th and try to use the flash has fill. That doesn't work very well inside. Also, depending on how the bounds/falls off, your background may also darken getting you a little better separation. Personally I'm not crazy about trying to filter one light source to match another. I've never had very good luck with that even using a color meter.
As far as PP is concern less is always more. I would probably Set my thresholds and then use levels and try to find middle gray on her white blouse, then back the saturation out just a little.
I appreciate both photos has candids and hesitate to criticize the poses or lack thereof. It should be noted however that a studio Portrait is 75% more likely to sell if the model makes eye contact with the camera. good work!

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2012 12:51:55   #
rdbroman
 
Guy Johnstone wrote:
I think Captain C statement about the shutter speed he utilizes when using flash should be underscored. A higher shutter speed will underexpose the ambient lighting leaving you with a single strong source much cleaner. If left to their own devices (In some auto setting) most cameras will select a shutter speed of around 1/30th to 1/60th and try to use the flash has fill. That doesn't work very well inside. Also, depending on how the bounds/falls off, your background may also darken getting you a little better separation. Personally I'm not crazy about trying to filter one light source to match another. I've never had very good luck with that even using a color meter.
As far as PP is concern less is always more. I would probably Set my thresholds and then use levels and try to find middle gray on her white blouse, then back the saturation out just a little.
I appreciate both photos has candids and hesitate to criticize the poses or lack thereof. It should be noted however that a studio Portrait is 75% more likely to sell if the model makes eye contact with the camera. good work!
I think Captain C statement about the shutter sp... (show quote)


Good point. You picked up on my error. I try to remember to set shutter speed at 1/200 when using flash. Looks like I forgot this tiny, but important detail. Shutter speed as your correctly estimated: 1/30. Rats. Lesson learned.
Your comment about a wider aperture as a result thereof would have resulted in a more obscured background as well.
This is another reason why this forum is helpful. It can remind all of us to pay attention to the devil who appears to be in charge of the details.

Reply
Jan 11, 2012 13:01:56   #
Dryart38 Loc: Carlsbad, NM
 
Guy Johnstone! Good advice - I agree with your studio reasoning! In this case an upward look would have looked like she was mugging the camera, which she isn't, which makes this picture much more successful. This shoot started out to be a bunch of candid photos, which it accomplished nicely! News photographers get a lot of assignments of this type, and a lot of journals won't use mugging pix - if I were an editor, I'd use these shots before the posed pix. IMHO!

Reply
Jan 12, 2012 02:38:00   #
Dunatic
 
rdbroman wrote:
Took this picture with a telephoto lens with bounce flash and
ambient light. Candid approach as she was not aware of having
her picture taken. I personally like the contemplative positioning.
Would appreciate comments on lighting primarily and secondarily on the pose. Any other suggestions are obviously welcome.


Honestly, to me, it doesn't look like lipstick as much as chapped lips. Anyway, when my daughter was young she played dress up all the time and it did include lipstick...I see no problem with it when used in play. Also, I like the photo very much. The color adjustment made to the photo improved the hair color. Cheryl

Reply
Jan 12, 2012 11:38:00   #
cony25
 
Was just reading the posting, how would you correct the double colors in aperture or photoshop?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.