Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
WPC - Archived Photos
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
Aug 30, 2013 14:08:16   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
OK, can we please stop this discussion now? The rules have been changed, like it or not. Enough said.
sammytalia7 wrote:
Okay, I am not a competitive person, but I do want to learn from others under the same constraints. No matter the rules, it is still the individual's right to participate or not. If you are too busy, skip the week you cannot participate. Time is a constraint we all deal with, and if you are a professional, I am sure you have a timeline on your projects for your clients. You should be used to it. Let's get serious. I don't usually have attitude in a discourse, however, the sarcasm and rudeness here by a few is inappropriate. Just express your opinions without belittling or questioning others about their point of you. Maybe what I just said should be a rule. lol
Okay, I am not a competitive person, but I do want... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 14:13:56   #
sammytalia7 Loc: Verde Valley, Arizona
 
Okay, never mind!

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 14:22:59   #
STVest Loc: LA - that's Lower Alabama
 
[quote=gessman]Let me see here, if I got the intent of this right, since I seem to be the most recent and egregious offender, let me see if I can sooth your pain a bit. This is not just for you but also for the few others who obviously do not seem to understand the nature of this issue. /quote]

Gessman, I apologize for naming you in my earlier comment and putting you on the defensive in this thread. Perhaps if it hadn’t been so far past my bedtime and I had been thinking more clearly, I wouldn’t have named names. You came to mind because (1) your photo was so very good, and (2) in your interview you had revealed your medical/health situation. In a prior thread regarding archived photos I had commented how medical and health issues could prevent some Hogs from being able to adhere to a limiting time frame. So, there you were, at the front of my brain, taking up so much of it I wasn’t seeing all of the potential consequences of my words. I am sorry if I caused you to be or feel personally attacked.

Please don’t let any of this prevent you from continuing to enter the challenges. Since your win in “still-life” immediately followed by showing in “negative space”, I now play another little game during the challenge. I call it “Guess which is Gessman’s”. Late tonight, I'll see if I was right or not on "Round".

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2013 20:09:24   #
AK Dreamer Loc: Alaska & Nevada
 
I for one will not enter the contests in the future ( though who really cares). I stopped submitting photos to this forum in its entirety due to the rudeness of individuals on a number of the issues and in support of a friend who has just recently returned to UHH. I have been undergoing chemo therapy for the past 6 months and quite frankly do not feel well enough to adhere to the "no archive rule". I have submitted a couple of photos that I felt pertinent to the topic but they did come from my archive files. I will adhere to the rules but feel the loss of other contributors (not me) to this segment of UHH is doing a disservice to those of us wanting to learn from more accomplished photographers and isn't this the foundation of this forum?

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 20:14:55   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
riverlass wrote:
Rules seem to be "the bad guy" here. What happen to following the rules? ...

Thank you

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 20:15:30   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
gessman wrote:
Let me see here, if I got the intent of this right, since I seem to be the most recent and egregious offender, let me see if I can sooth your pain a bit. This is not just for you but also for the few others who obviously do not seem to understand the nature of this issue.

I won't repeat this again but the rules up to now have allowed a person to use images that were not created within the time span of the ongoing challenge/contest regardless of the basis for the intent. Just so we will know who you are and are not talking about in your rant, I'm soon to be 77, rode in on the heels of the Great Depression in 1937, lived through WWII and Korea the underprivileged, middle of three boys who enjoyed hand-me-down clothes, no bicycles, no tv, no computer, no camera, and few toys of any sort, the son of a dirt poor Southern Baptist Minister in Arkansas. I won't speak for everyone else but if you're implying that I'm a spoiled brat you clearly must be judging all situations by something you have no knowledge or understanding about.

While not speaking for others, I was not being purposely opportunistic due to being a spoiled brat and quite frankly, your jaded commentary was quite uncalled for in my case and I'm not digging for a bone of sympathy. A 40 year diabetic, with the ravages of age and the partial amputation of my left foot the day before Thanksgiving last year has made it a little more difficult to do some things I would like to do so I will do it how the rules allow me to or won't do it at all, just so you and the others who read the rules and decided for your own self what they should say rather than what they do say and also so each of you can get things in very clear perspective. As long as I am staying within the guidelines of what the rules DO say, not what you think they ought to say, frankly I don't care what you think or say but you'd look a lot more intelligent if you didn't try to impose your will on the rest of the world.

I've grown increasingly weary with those of you who think using historical images up to now was a violation of the rules. Frankly, my first entry into this whole scenario was a couple of weeks ago, having entered a contest only once previously in a Classmates.com photography forum about five years ago, which, incidentally, I tied with two others for first place in, and to be honest with you, I don't need any of this to enjoy my hobby to my satisfaction, especially the rancor from some or you who either cannot read or alternatively cannot understand what you've read in the rules. I have no interest in an ongoing conflict with any of you but you need to pay attention to the reality of the situation and stop criticizing people who have followed the rules as they currently exist up until the current edition labeled "Labor" wherein they have been changed going forward.

The rules have been changed, are duly noted by me, and hopefully St3v3M will be a little less lenient on those who cannot see that their images do not fit the subject and ruthlessly cull them out even if it does mean that the whole endeavor will have to be scrapped for lack of adequate qualified participation. I'm sorry about your smoke problem but your misfortune doesn't authorize you to come blowing it at me. Now, if your apparent rant was just all in good fun, so is mine, or if I somehow failed to grasp the significance of what you said, nevermind!
Let me see here, if I got the intent of this right... (show quote)

Well said

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 20:16:21   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
sammytalia7 wrote:
Okay, I am not a competitive person, but I do want to learn from others under the same constraints. No matter the rules, it is still the individual's right to participate or not. If you are too busy, skip the week you cannot participate. Time is a constraint we all deal with, and if you are a professional, I am sure you have a timeline on your projects for your clients. You should be used to it. Let's get serious. I don't usually have attitude in a discourse, however, the sarcasm and rudeness here by a few is inappropriate. Just express your opinions without belittling or questioning others about their point of you. Maybe what I just said should be a rule. lol
Okay, I am not a competitive person, but I do want... (show quote)

Good points.

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2013 20:17:25   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
AK Dreamer wrote:
I for one will not enter the contests in the future ( though who really cares). I stopped submitting photos to this forum in its entirety due to the rudeness of individuals on a number of the issues and in support of a friend who has just recently returned to UHH. I have been undergoing chemo therapy for the past 6 months and quite frankly do not feel well enough to adhere to the "no archive rule". I have submitted a couple of photos that I felt pertinent to the topic but they did come from my archive files. I will adhere to the rules but feel the loss of other contributors (not me) to this segment of UHH is doing a disservice to those of us wanting to learn from more accomplished photographers and isn't this the foundation of this forum?
I for one will not enter the contests in the futur... (show quote)

No real changes have been made yet...

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 21:57:21   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
[quote=STVest]
gessman wrote:
Let me see here, if I got the intent of this right, since I seem to be the most recent and egregious offender, let me see if I can sooth your pain a bit. This is not just for you but also for the few others who obviously do not seem to understand the nature of this issue. /quote]

Gessman, I apologize for naming you in my earlier comment and putting you on the defensive in this thread. Perhaps if it hadn’t been so far past my bedtime and I had been thinking more clearly, I wouldn’t have named names. You came to mind because (1) your photo was so very good, and (2) in your interview you had revealed your medical/health situation. In a prior thread regarding archived photos I had commented how medical and health issues could prevent some Hogs from being able to adhere to a limiting time frame. So, there you were, at the front of my brain, taking up so much of it I wasn’t seeing all of the potential consequences of my words. I am sorry if I caused you to be or feel personally attacked.
Let me see here, if I got the intent of this right... (show quote)


Not even close and there's no need for an apology. I do appreciate your extreme compliment. I could have remained passive but chose not to.

STVest wrote:

Please don’t let any of this prevent you from continuing to enter the challenges. Since your win in “still-life” immediately followed by showing in “negative space”, I now play another little game during the challenge. I call it “Guess which is Gessman’s”. Late tonight, I'll see if I was right or not on "Round".


I'm not easily discouraged. I really hadn't planned on becoming a regular because most of the subjects don't match up with what I like to shoot or else they don't lend themselves to the accomplishment of a real good quality image as I perceive it. But, I think I may hang around a little while now and see if I can help a couple of folks expand their minds or at least their attitudes.

I like your "little game" and would be interested in how you do. I will encourage you because I realize that it's all about testing your intuition and any kind of brain exercise is good. I do have an image in the "Texture" and the "Round" WPCs, if you're interested, so you can raise your chances of getting at least a 50-50 if you want to get serious about it. :roll:

Maybe I probably should warn you that these images may have been "cherry-picked" from my all-time top ten images out my 45+ year archives and I've stripped the exif data from them just so I could enter them in a contest with absolutely no possibility of winning a reward of any kind. Some might say that would be at least borderline psychotic but above all, not a real challenge because St3v3M didn't assign the subject and I didn't have only a week to get the shot, no offense.

Do you think I should point out that I sold a thriving business and the family home and moved cold turkey with a senior and junior in high school and a sixth grader from one part of the country with no desirable nature photo opportunities to another part of the country that is about as good as it gets just so I would have some challenging subject matter to pursue my unpaid hobby and so nobody could accuse me of not being adequately challenged? What do you think? Is it me who is borderline psychotic or is someone who would accuse others of these kinds of acts? Do you think I ought to try to convince anyone that I do what I do out of a sense of pride and accomplishment or shall I just let them think I'm a slacker who just wants to cheat someone out of... what? NOTHING?

Reply
Aug 30, 2013 22:49:17   #
PAPAJOE69 Loc: Darien, GA
 
I consider anything Archivall to be anything I have in my portfolio w when the contest topic is announced. So I must shoot new stuff. It is a challenge but I always carry a camera so I always have an opportunity. The adventure is in the doing. And it is all in the fun and learning. We have plenty of room to show our archival shots in other parts of this forum.

Reply
Aug 31, 2013 10:52:47   #
findlekind Loc: Canada, west coast
 
PAPAJOE69 wrote:
I consider anything Archivall to be anything I have in my portfolio w when the contest topic is announced. So I must shoot new stuff. It is a challenge but I always carry a camera so I always have an opportunity. The adventure is in the doing. And it is all in the fun and learning. We have plenty of room to show our archival shots in other parts of this forum.


Agree completely.

Reply
 
 
Aug 31, 2013 11:21:18   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
findlekind wrote:
Agree completely.


I agree completely too but that is an irrelevant comment in this instance because archived images were permitted under the rules. How many times do you people have to hear that for you to understand that there has been no violation of the rules. Furthermore, and I'm done with this idiocy after this final comment - I would wager that less than 10% of all the images ever entered in these "challenges/contests" have been shot within the week prior to voting, but I wouldn't waste my time checking it backwards - from here on maybe if I were running things. which I'm not, but that wouldn't be the only thing I would do differently if I were. If I decide to enter in the future it will not be with archived images.

Reply
Aug 31, 2013 12:07:17   #
findlekind Loc: Canada, west coast
 
gessman wrote:
... I would wager that less than 10% of all the images ever entered in these "challenges/contests" have been shot within the week prior to voting ...


That's a very good guess. So far in the current challenge it's about 13.5%

Reply
Aug 31, 2013 14:48:43   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
This is still In Progress so don't give up yet.

Reply
Aug 31, 2013 15:37:30   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
St3v3M wrote:
This is still In Progress so don't give up yet.


My sincere apologies if I have contributed to any possible obstructionism or associated consternation. All I thought I was doing was dropping in and playing the game as it appeared to be already in progress and without any serious underlying urge to alter the methodology. Again, I commend you for your energy and dedication to the ongoing effort.

Until the still life challenge I had never even looked at what you were doing - never opened a single thread - no interest in challenges or contests. Having recently challenged myself further as I have been doing for 45+ years, and having just gotten interested in indoor disciplines such as portraiture and still life, and having seen still life as one of your upcoming categories, and since I am a solitary person with nobody to discuss photography with, I thought I'd toss one in and get some feedback on it. My, how complicated it has become, that little bit of feedback I was looking for. I have unwittingly become an internationally renown larcenous bastard who not only is no kind of an accomplished photo hobbyist but one who would choke under pressure and who would cheat his own dying mother over bragging rights. St3v3M, you have indeed attracted some strange, ignorant, and petty people into you world.

...and let me just add that some of those have a gross over-estimation of their net worth on the international photography scene and hence spend a little too much time and effort trying to instruct the rest of the world when they themselves do not seem to have fully grasped the big picture just judging by the images they produce. Some of those need to go quietly into the woods and re-emerge when they are men and more one with their camera than with their mouth.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.