Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
what do I look for in a mono pod
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Aug 26, 2013 10:53:26   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Buy expensive quality, buy once.
Buy bargains, buy 3 times.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 11:03:42   #
saichiez Loc: Beautiful Central Oregon
 
karelowe wrote:
I am getting ready to purchase a mono pod. They are cheap to expensive. What should I really be looking for?


Fewest sections possible with tight non slip locks or latches. Round legs as opposed to shaped (rectangular or oval). Again less wobble along the length.

A three section monopod is less wobbly or limber than a 4 or 5 section monopod when extended. Shorter when folded up. may be easier to carry, but a limp 5 section monopod fully open offers less stability.

Personally, I shoot a Olympus PEN Mirrorless and went back to an old solution.

The String Pod. Rolls up in my pocket. Has a threaded end that screws into the tripod socket on the camera and has a loop on the other end.

Put the loop over my foot (I'm ambidextrous feetwise, using either equally well). The length is set to allow holding the camera to eye level or lcd level, while holding upward tension on the camera and also using the camera IS to stabilize.

Works for me as good as a monopod, whereas I do usually use a Tripod for best stability, and it's usually in my car.

Ball Heads On A Monopod....

Requires hiring of a Sherpa... to carry the added weight and the extra hands necessary to help position and tighten the ball unit. Very sloppy indeed, and makes a Monopod quite top heavy in field use. At least that's my opinion on the heavier ball heads. I opt for the simpler small ball using hold and adjust the camera, tighten the one screw, units.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 12:11:11   #
pedalmasher Loc: Seminole, FL
 
NewEnglandPhotoguy wrote:
This is the one I use. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/655319-REG/Induro_471_524_CM24_Carbon_8X_CM_Series.html

It's extremely light, only 1/2 a turn to release/lock the legs, very strong. I use a Manfrotto head that flips forward and back only. A great combo. I use it for shooting birds with a 300mm lens.

One more point: unlike aluminum, the carbon fiber doesn't feel or transmit cold/heat to your hands. It's always comfortable.


That's the exact monopod my research has led me to. Just trying to decide on a ball head, and I am considering the Induro BHL2 which although expensive is light and apparently very high quality.

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2013 12:33:19   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
Wahawk wrote:
For a monopod, I figure it needs to be light, quick to set up and easy to use. I don't need the major stability of a good tripod, so I got a nice, compact, light monopod in disguise......

In the Walmart sporting goods section is a Rifle/Shotgun Rest.....
Really a monopod with a plastic "V" to rest the long barrel in, has a foam grip and wrist strap.... $10 !!! I added a small ball-head for another $10. VERY light, quite sturdy (but not as stiff as a $60+ one). I can rest the lens barrel in the "V" or unscrew the "V" and put the camera directly on it!! Plus it is short enough when 'folded' up that I can tuck it against my belt without fully extending.... Works great for me!!
For a monopod, I figure it needs to be light, quic... (show quote)


I started with similar unit from Cabella's. $20 each.

Then I saw another photog using a Manfrotto 3245 (replaced by the 334B). I bought one as soon as I could.

Only 2 adjustments. One for gross height, and a squeeze trigger for finer adjustments. That means, while shooting, I can adjust the height in a second or two, without taking my hand away from the grip. Wouldn't give it up for love nor money.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 12:46:31   #
TonyB Loc: Cornwall UK
 
I recommend the Manfrotto MM294 for entry level DSLRs and bridge cameras. It is very stiff and yet fairly light weight compared with the MM680 which would be better for big cameras and heavy lens'.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 12:46:32   #
TonyB Loc: Cornwall UK
 
I recommend the Manfrotto MM294 for entry level DSLRs and bridge cameras. It is very stiff and yet fairly light weight compared with the MM680 which would be better for big cameras and heavy lens'.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 12:52:14   #
TonyB Loc: Cornwall UK
 
Oops sorry for double entry.

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2013 13:00:48   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Wall-E wrote:
I started with similar unit from Cabella's. $20 each.

Then I saw another photog using a Manfrotto 3245 (replaced by the 334B). I bought one as soon as I could.

Only 2 adjustments. One for gross height, and a squeeze trigger for finer adjustments. That means, while shooting, I can adjust the height in a second or two, without taking my hand away from the grip. Wouldn't give it up for love nor money.


The 385b has 1 single handed adjustment for total height - but is $50 to $60 more than the 334b - but worth it IMHO.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 13:05:19   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
imagemeister wrote:
The 385b has 1 single handed adjustment for total height - but is $50 to $60 more than the 334b - but worth it IMHO.


Do you mean 685B????

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 13:22:13   #
bcheary Loc: Jacksonville, FL
 
karelowe wrote:
I am getting ready to purchase a mono pod. They are cheap to expensive. What should I really be looking for?


I have the Manfrotto 680B with the Manfrotto 234 tilt head with quick release. Collapsed with head the total length is about 23". Three section extensions.. Weight 2lbs 7oz. I am 5ft 9inches tall. Fully extended the tilt head is above my eye level. This unit is sturdy enough to hold my Canon T3i plus Sigma 150-500mm. I did not see much use for a ball head. I do have a Manfrotto 3265 pistol grip ballhead but haven't had a need for it yet.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 14:53:35   #
Bill MN Loc: Western MN
 
EstherP wrote:
A ball head head is less crucial on a monopod than a tilt head.
I have the Manfrotto 680B. There is no need to turn (pan) the camera on a ball head, as the monopod has only on tip on the ground and the whole thing turns.
By the same token, I guess you could tilt the whole setup easily, but it probably wouldn't be very comfortable... to a tilt head, I believe, is the way to go (saves you some money in the process). The head I have with this monopod is 234RC.
And yes, I am happy with both 'pod and head.
EstherP
A ball head head is less crucial on a monopod than... (show quote)
Esther you are right about a ball head unless you have a strong wrist. I don't think they are much good with a long heavy lens. I'm probably one of the few that likes a light weight gimbal on a monopod. I secure the swivel and only use the tilt. They are fast to lock in place if need be but I usually don't. A tilt is much better than a ball head if a person has weak wrists but a gimbal is smooth. Good for birds high up or on the ground and all raptors. Probably other things too. :idea:

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2013 15:03:42   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
bcheary wrote:
I have the Manfrotto 680B with the Manfrotto 234 tilt head with quick release. Collapsed with head the total length is about 23". Three section extensions.. Weight 2lbs 7oz. I am 5ft 9inches tall. Fully extended the tilt head is above my eye level. This unit is sturdy enough to hold my Canon T3i plus Sigma 150-500mm. I did not see much use for a ball head. I do have a Manfrotto 3265 pistol grip ballhead but haven't had a need for it yet.


The #3265 ( AKA #222) in conjuction with the 234rc provides the ultimate in speed and coverage. In addition, the 3265 provides much needed height to do high-angle shots such as birds up in a tree. The 234rc is the course adjustment and the 3265 is the high speed fine adjustment if you choose to lock the 234. The 234rc works well by itself - but the 3265 adds another desireable dimension. see below....



Reply
Aug 26, 2013 15:10:19   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
As with a gimbal head, it is important to have the camera/lens you are using BALANCED at the pivot point/mounting.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 15:43:52   #
pedalmasher Loc: Seminole, FL
 
TonyB wrote:
I recommend the Manfrotto MM294 for entry level DSLRs and bridge cameras. It is very stiff and yet fairly light weight compared with the MM680 which would be better for big cameras and heavy lens'.


Tony, do you think that would be sufficient for a setup sporting a Canon 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L USM IS lens which is a reasonably heavy lens?

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 16:28:06   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Wall-E wrote:
Do you mean 685B????


Sorry, Yes I do mean 685b ! - ( it's hell to get old ...)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.