Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Macro or 'close-u-p'?
Aug 14, 2013 10:12:11   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
I own and enjoy using the Canon SX-50 but am curious about the 'macro' use. The camera has a macro setting, but even without setting the camera in macro, you can move in so close to the object and actually touch it with the lens, and get a 'macro' shot. What I'm wondering is what is the difference when you set it in the macro setting, compared to not setting it as such?

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 10:40:28   #
billwassmann Loc: Emerson, NJ
 
I don't use Canons so I can't comment directly. But generally macros are valued not just because of close up but they have better sharpness out to the edges. Virtually any lens will be pretty sharp in the center.

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 10:43:41   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
I don't know about the Canon SX-50, but on my compact cameras when I set to "macro mode", the camera simply chooses a shutter speed/f-stop combination that is more suitable for macro photography.

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2013 17:24:23   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Try test shots of the same subject to see if the depth of field is affected.

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 17:28:41   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Try test shots of the same subject to see if the depth of field is affected.


Thanks All, I'll check further into it. All this new learning hurts my tired, old, brain :D

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 17:42:51   #
TonyB Loc: Cornwall UK
 
I believe that when set to macro or supermacro the camera focusses quicker than when macro is off.

Reply
Aug 14, 2013 17:44:11   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
TonyB wrote:
I believe that when set to macro or supermacro the camera focusses quicker than when macro is off.


That could very well be, Tony. Thanks... I'll check it out.

Reply
 
 
Aug 15, 2013 07:33:44   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Papa Joe wrote:
I own and enjoy using the Canon SX-50 but am curious about the 'macro' use. The camera has a macro setting, but even without setting the camera in macro, you can move in so close to the object and actually touch it with the lens, and get a 'macro' shot. What I'm wondering is what is the difference when you set it in the macro setting, compared to not setting it as such?

Macro settings on cameras/compacts and/or zooms that claim macro capabilities, don't actually do macro, as that starts at a 1:1 magnification and is only accomplished by using a real macro lens or modifiers to give you to that magnification.

Reply
Aug 15, 2013 09:19:02   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Papa Joe wrote:
All this new learning hurts my tired, old, brain :D


I know the feeling!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.