Portrait photography question
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with regards to portraits.
My question is, when it comes to portraits, is it considered acceptable to class a head shot of a sculpture/statue as a portrait?
I only ask because there's a local newspaper competition that has various categories and one of them is portraits. As it's not an area I've ventured into photography wise, I wondered if I could use something other than human/animal.
The image I was considering entering is below.
Also, if it doesn't follow any "rules" of portrait photography I'd be grateful for any pointers.
At Peace
scruffyherbert wrote:
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with regards to portraits.
My question is, when it comes to portraits, is it considered acceptable to class a head shot of a sculpture/statue as a portrait?
I only ask because there's a local newspaper competition that has various categories and one of them is portraits. As it's not an area I've ventured into photography wise, I wondered if I could use something other than human/animal.
The image I was considering entering is below.
Also, if it doesn't follow any "rules" of portrait photography I'd be grateful for any pointers.
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with reg... (
show quote)
You'd really be better off asking those running the competition.
Any opinions expressed here are not binding on those at the newspaper.
BTW, nice pic!
Very nice picture, but in MOST competitions when they have a "Portrait" category they are wanting photographs of actual living people. Sometimes the rules with include pet or animal portraits as well. I have not seen any where statue 'portraits' were considered acceptable.
HOWEVER, as already mentioned, for FINAL definition you would need to carefully review their rules and ask THEM your questions.
Thanks for the replies.
Unfortunately the rules are non existent and the terms and conditions don't stress any particular requirements other than you must live in the paper's circulation area and be a non professional photographer.
Knowing what the newspaper is like it will be very traditional in it's interpretations so I think I have a new photographic discipline to venture into :)
Thanks again :thumbup:
Portrait - Wikipedia
A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is predominant. The intent is to display the likeness, personality, and even the mood of the person. For this reason, in photography a portrait is generally not a snapshot, but a composed image of a person in a still position. A portrait often shows a person looking directly at the painter or photographer, in order to most successfully engage the subject with the viewer.
Chinaman
Loc: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
No. It is one of those unspoken rules. Another is no dead animals for a wildlife/animal category. Your shot is very nicely done and is considered a record of another person's artistic work. However, they are acceptable in a picture if they form a part of your creative process and important to the final image. For example, a statue in a scenic shot of town square for a travel or cityscape category. In your shot above, if you had a real person who looks like the statue and is placed next to it, the shot will be accepted as you are using the statue to show a likeness of the two, telling a story and maybe injecting some humour. Your current image can be submitted for a Record/Still Life category, but not portraiture.
Hi Scruffy, nice shot but winning portraits are all about showing Emotion and personality. The image should speak for its self in telling the story of the subject. eg grief, pain, sorrow, happiness et al. Good luck
dwightdills wrote:
Portrait - Wikipedia
A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is predominant. The intent is to display the likeness, personality, and even the mood of the person. For this reason, in photography a portrait is generally not a snapshot, but a composed image of a person in a still position. A portrait often shows a person looking directly at the painter or photographer, in order to most successfully engage the subject with the viewer.
Portrait - Wikipedia br br A portrait is a painti... (
show quote)
Thanks for that dwight, I apprecaite it.
Chinaman wrote:
No. It is one of those unspoken rules. Another is no dead animals for a wildlife/animal category. Your shot is very nicely done and is considered a record of another person's artistic work. However, they are acceptable in a picture if they form a part of your creative process and important to the final image. For example, a statue in a scenic shot of town square for a travel or cityscape category. In your shot above, if you had a real person who looks like the statue and is placed next to it, the shot will be accepted as you are using the statue to show a likeness of the two, telling a story and maybe injecting some humour. Your current image can be submitted for a Record/Still Life category, but not portraiture.
No. It is one of those unspoken rules. Another is ... (
show quote)
Thanks a lot Chinaman. Some great advice there and it makes perfect sense. Thanks for valuable info, it's appreciated.
KenL wrote:
Hi Scruffy, nice shot but winning portraits are all about showing Emotion and personality. The image should speak for its self in telling the story of the subject. eg grief, pain, sorrow, happiness et al. Good luck
Thanks Ken and I appreciate your help. I'm going to have to up my game and have a go at portraits. All part of the fun of photography :thumbup:
scruffyherbert wrote:
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with regards to portraits.
The image I was considering entering is below.
I'd like to see more light on the subject's face.
By definition, a sculpture is already a portrait of a person captured by an artist. Would you take a picture of the Mona Lisa and call it a portrait? I would say no. Even if the rules say differently, your sense as a photographer should be to capture something unique, a moment, a gesture, light or color. I don't think a sculpture qualifies. My 2.
Jaime wrote:
By definition, a sculpture is already a portrait of a person captured by an artist. Would you take a picture of the Mona Lisa and call it a portrait? I would say no. Even if the rules say differently, your sense as a photographer should be to capture something unique, a moment, a gesture, light or color. I don't think a sculpture qualifies. My 2.
At least you wouldn't have to tell him to stand still or turn one way or the other.
scruffyherbert wrote:
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with regards to portraits.
My question is, when it comes to portraits, is it considered acceptable to class a head shot of a sculpture/statue as a portrait?
I only ask because there's a local newspaper competition that has various categories and one of them is portraits. As it's not an area I've ventured into photography wise, I wondered if I could use something other than human/animal.
The image I was considering entering is below.
Also, if it doesn't follow any "rules" of portrait photography I'd be grateful for any pointers.
I wondered if anyone could help or advise with reg... (
show quote)
It seems most opinions are negative, but why not enter it in the competition and see if it's rejected? Good photo.
LLucas
Loc: Upstate South Carolina, USA
It is a great photo- I agree, try it and see. Then let us know!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.