Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
portrait lens
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 27, 2011 06:24:45   #
rickyd Loc: Dothan, Al
 
if you had to choose one lens to do portrait work, what would it be?,,not interested in brands, just the lens, 35, 50, 80 mm, etc

Reply
Dec 27, 2011 07:03:58   #
notnoBuddha
 
You often see where the 50mm is touted for this purpose as it is the closest in replicating the human eye as to focal length - waht you see is what you get. There are also several rather fast ones avaiable at a resonable price. Myself - I prefer a 80mm, or even around 100mm as you don't have to get so close but again a fast lens will run you more bucks. 35mm is just too wide except maybe for groups.

Reply
Dec 27, 2011 07:04:07   #
traveler90712 Loc: Lake Worth, Fl.
 
rickyd wrote:
if you had to choose one lens to do portrait work, what would it be?,,not interested in brands, just the lens, 35, 50, 80 mm, etc


Nifty Fifty for me

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 27, 2011 07:05:02   #
rickyd Loc: Dothan, Al
 
notnoBuddha wrote:
You often see where the 50mm is touted for this purpose as it is the closest in replicating the human eye as to focal length - waht you see is what you get. There are also several rather fast ones avaiable at a resonable price. Myself - I prefer a 80mm, or even around 100mm as you don't have to get so close but again a fast lens will run you more bucks. 35mm is just too wide except maybe for groups.


thanks for the feedback, I have heard many ideas, was jsut curious what others thought

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 07:46:54   #
photocat Loc: Atlanta, Ga
 
For those of you using a crop sensor camera the 50 will probably do a nice job for you.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 10:24:35   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
The lens I love for Head shots is 135mm f2.8. Sorry but I am going to use a brand. I got a 135mm f2.8 preset t-mount lens for $19.95 in 1969. It is sharp and has great bokeh. It works great on my Nikon. You have to use it on M. I just got one for a friend on eBay. You can also get a t-mount for most cameras there. - Dave

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 10:46:43   #
MWAC Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
 
I use the 24-70 followed by my 85mm.

I pull out the nifty fifty every now and again, the bokeh, well nice, just isn't as nice as the 24-70 is able to pull off.

Reply
 
 
Dec 28, 2011 10:48:03   #
photosbysexton Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
50 for me, but, with the 4/3 setup in my Olympus gear this equals 100mm in film terms. I like it, but my next purchase will be the 25mm to even things out. I love the 50mm for macro, but I have to put too much distance between me and my subject for anything other than head and shoulder shots.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 10:56:13   #
naturalite Loc: Up state NY
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
The lens I love for Head shots is 135mm f2.8. Sorry but I am going to use a brand. I got a 135mm f2.8 preset t-mount lens for $19.95 in 1969. It is sharp and has great bokeh. It works great on my Nikon. You have to use it on M. I just got one for a friend on eBay. You can also get a t-mount for most cameras there. - Dave


I also like to use my Takumar 135mm f/2.5 for head shots. I got it for $35. But I do rely on my 50mm f/1.2 as well.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 11:40:41   #
RLPCEP Loc: Tallahassee FL
 
notnoBuddha wrote:
You often see where the 50mm is touted for this purpose as it is the closest in replicating the human eye as to focal length - waht you see is what you get. There are also several rather fast ones avaiable at a resonable price. Myself - I prefer a 80mm, or even around 100mm as you don't have to get so close but again a fast lens will run you more bucks. 35mm is just too wide except maybe for groups.


That is certainly true if it is on an SLR film camera or a DSLR with an FX sensor, but with a DX sensor, a 50 mm becomes the equivelant of a 75 mm. A 35 mm lens on a DX will get you pretty close to a true 50 MM perspective. This is an important issue in evidence/crime scene photography when the image must be as close as reasonably possible to the perspective of the human eye - for example, accident scenes. I don't do much portraiture, but what I have have picked up is that there seems to be a consensus that a more flattering photo is produced using moderate telephoto.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 12:09:30   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
Canon 85mm F1.2

Reply
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Dec 28, 2011 12:46:59   #
jackinkc Loc: Kansas City
 
rickyd wrote:
if you had to choose one lens to do portrait work, what would it be?,,not interested in brands, just the lens, 35, 50, 80 mm, etc


A 50 works well with sensors sized less than full frame.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 14:32:50   #
CamObs Loc: South America (Texas)
 
I use a 100mm a 135mm. Gets out of the face of the subject and lets them be more at ease. Film or dige...no matter.

Reply
Dec 28, 2011 17:23:40   #
DebbieB Loc: Maryland
 
Actually I have two favorites. I agree with a lot of folks here, I love my 50mm 1.8. Would love to have the 1.4 but on a fixed income here. I take a lot of photos of animals and the 50mm is great for close-ups with nice bokeh. For people, I prefer my 85mm. Nice portrait lens and I don't have to be as close. This is a good example of the 50mm. Just the face is in focus - eyes, nose, whiskers. Everything else is soft.

Example of my 50mm 1.8
Example of my 50mm 1.8...

Reply
Jan 9, 2012 20:43:32   #
rickyd Loc: Dothan, Al
 
I have a 50 1.8 that I am going to try, is on my canon AE-1 35mm, but I was going to use that anyway in conjunction with my d50 18-50 mm, cannot remember the numbers on it right this instant though,,

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.