Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
40 Day Trip and Overwhelmed
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Aug 2, 2013 10:50:22   #
cetw Loc: Miami FL
 
love them

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 11:04:29   #
Jas Loc: Calabasas, CA
 
Interesting to see how many different ways people handle their workflow. I create a new folder in the LR photo library and copy the new pictures into it using WIndows Explorer. But before I import them into LR, I open the new folder with Photo Mechanic, which is the fastest program I've ever used to scan pictures full size, no matter what their format. I used their single-stroke color keys to mark the shots I don't want, then delete them. If I haven't deleted at least a third, I go back again. Then I go to LR and import, as I've now removed the worst shots before I got into LR. As I'm working in LR, I use the X key to mark shots I don't want, and select Delete Rejected Photos from the Photo menu every so often to remove them from LR and from the hard drive.

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 11:54:23   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
SwedeUSA wrote:
How does this help him with HIS question?

He's more than likely also heading there next June, and they can meet and discuss photography. :D

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2013 12:09:50   #
big-guy Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
 
So if I have this straight, you use one program to cull out your bad shots, then import into LR and then use the "X" picker to cull out your bad shots. So what is the purpose of the first program? Why wouldn't you just use LR and as your culling the shots use your filters to hide the "X" picks and show your "P" picks and "U" unpicked. Then every so often delete the "X" picks as you do now?

Jas wrote:
Interesting to see how many different ways people handle their workflow. I create a new folder in the LR photo library and copy the new pictures into it using WIndows Explorer. But before I import them into LR, I open the new folder with Photo Mechanic, which is the fastest program I've ever used to scan pictures full size, no matter what their format. I used their single-stroke color keys to mark the shots I don't want, then delete them. If I haven't deleted at least a third, I go back again. Then I go to LR and import, as I've now removed the worst shots before I got into LR. As I'm working in LR, I use the X key to mark shots I don't want, and select Delete Rejected Photos from the Photo menu every so often to remove them from LR and from the hard drive.
Interesting to see how many different ways people ... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 12:31:42   #
Baysitter11 Loc: Cincinnati
 
mborn wrote:
I utilize Gavin Gough's workflow make it simple here is a link to a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI_fo9Ba3gs


Thanks. I will give this a look when I get home today.

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 12:35:38   #
Baysitter11 Loc: Cincinnati
 
big-guy wrote:
While there is lots of input for you here, I strongly recommend you read Kelby's book and follow his methods. LR was designed and created by and for professional photographers to keep the workflow to a minimum. Using it properly will do just that and save you hours upon hours of going back and re-inventing the wheel.

I have read many procedures here but unfortunately all have time consuming drawbacks (whether the poster realizes it or not) and LR does have the ability to do all these extra steps they talk about doing. Maybe, they just haven't figured out how to set LR to do those tasks for them.

I would recommend, as you are new to LR, to create a new catalog for this trip only just so you have quick access to the photos. Don't worry about doing it totally right as this will be a temporary "learning" catalog.

Do keep your originals elsewhere so when the day comes you can re-import and do it properly. There is a lot to understand about using LR to your advantage so don't feel the need to rush things. Once you hit that point and do a re-import properly, you will be amazed at the time savings and the quick access you will have to almost any photo in the catalog.

Hope this helps.
While there is lots of input for you here, I stron... (show quote)


Thank you, big guy. I am a very literal and hands on learner. That is why I bought the book. It as recommended here so many times. I just need a step 1, step 2, etc. method to get my photos ready for family, and a few for show. Thanks

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 15:35:32   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
MtnMan wrote:
I have about the same problem. I did the Alberta parks and then headed to Alaska. About 1,000 shots.
I loaded them into Lightroom as I went and backed up many of them. I have a preset that changes them to DNGs as they load. I added at least the keyword Alaska to them all and some of the animal keywords.
I took most of them in jpeg large fine so managed to have them all fit on one 32MB card without overflowing. I'm going to archive that card so if I ever want to go back and retrieve originals I can. I did shoot some of what I thought might be my best keepers in RAW and I'm not sure that doing the DNG conversion and preset didn't lose some sharpness for me.
I have about the same problem. I did the Alberta p... (show quote)

The RAW conversions always need more sharpening in Post Processing- the JPEG's got theirs in the conversion process.

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2013 17:27:57   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm curious about how you managed and stored all those images while you were away.

As for the "workflow," that is a major topic in digital photography. If you Google the term, you will find articles and videos.


The OP should answer also but I fit about 1,000 pics from a two-month trip with a D800 onto one 32GB card.

I backed them up as I went to my computer and an external hard drive. I was travelling in a camper so it was easy.

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 19:06:42   #
SwedeUSA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
He's more than likely also heading there next June, and they can meet and discuss photography. :D


You are hilarious, Jerryc41; I just wish that you could stay on the topic for once.

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 20:16:15   #
strikerazde Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The rating system is the way to go. I've only just started using LR5, but applying their stars isn't easy so I too would look at a simplier software to get rid of everything that doesn't justify additional concentration.


What could be easier than hitting a number 1 through 5 on your keyboard?

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 22:07:31   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Daisy61 wrote:
Hi, sounds great, I'm going out west to five national parks in the fall, I have a nikon 18-300 and a 10-24 do you think this is enough or do I need something more ?


I did it with a 28-300 and a 10-24. I was switching lenses all the time. Since then I've purchase a D800, and instead of selling my D7000 I've kept it as a second camera. Now, no lens swapping. A second camera on a long trip can always come in handy for this reason.

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2013 23:47:13   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
SwedeUSA wrote:
You are hilarious, Jerryc41; I just wish that you could stay on the topic for once.

Topic?

Reply
Aug 2, 2013 23:51:56   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Topic?

Topic?

Reply
Aug 3, 2013 00:11:17   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
I agree with Wall-E, I download using my Nikon software program and then import to Lightroom. I do not use DNG, only Raw. I then remove from Lightroom anything out of focus or clipped badly at either end (those shots before you remembered to adjust your settings).

Naming folders was something I had to develop my own system for, though. When I download into Nikon's ViewNX2, I rename the transfer number with the name of the trip using an extension of 'RAW' and move it to My Pictures and out of Nikon Transfer folder. When I finish my editing in Lightroom, I export my trip photos into a folder with the same trip name but with the extension 'JPEG'. Also, I name my trips with the year, underscore, then numerical month, space, then the trip name. This keeps all my travels (or whatever events) in chronological order. Not Scott Kelby's method, but it works well for me. It's not unusual to want to go back into RAW at a later date and re-adjust settings and, with my naming method, I can easily find my RAW and JPEG folders side-by-side.

Reply
Aug 3, 2013 01:48:12   #
Jas Loc: Calabasas, CA
 
I can get through all my pictures at top speed in Photo Mechanic. Yes, I could do it all in LR, but it would take a lot longer.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.