Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need advice on best wide-angle lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Dec 25, 2011 11:04:37   #
George Kravis
 
One good all around lens that takes me from wide angle to moderate tele is the 15 - 85mm Canon that is excellent for both nature and indoor parties. For more extreme WA, I'm pleased with the performance of my 10 - 24mm Tamron. Both are what I call moderately priced. Geo.K.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 11:08:26   #
pigpen
 
B&H has the Canon 10-22 for $90 off until Jan 7, making it $722.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 11:13:17   #
bohleber Loc: southern Indiana
 
Moose,
Thanks so much for your expert advice. Since all my lenses are Canon and i am very happy with them, I will
probably get the Canon 10-22.

Reply
 
 
Dec 25, 2011 11:17:36   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
Best wide angle zoom is the Canon 16-35 mm F2.8. It is great for shots close to a large building, for multiple faces indoors at close quarters, and for indoor shots of furniture, drapery, etc, where you have to shoot from very close to the subject.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 11:59:50   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
pigpen wrote:
I have the T2i. Personally, I have learned the hard way to save the $ and get the Canon version. I know there are a lot of people happy with the Sigma, but I've never been happy with any Sigma I've owned. I've always sold them ( for far less than I paid), and bought the Canon. Each time, being happier with the results. THIS IS JUST ME, I TEND TO BE MORE OCD THAN OTHERS.

But I must say, I bought the $284 Rokinon 8mm fisheye, which is totally manual. I bought it as a "toy", so I wasn't afraid of being dissapointed. I absolutely love it!! Like I said, bought it as a toy, I've sold prints from this lens. It paid for itself in 2 months.
I have the T2i. Personally, I have learned the ha... (show quote)


You know, you have to always wonder, how happy would the Sigma, Tamron, Tokina shooters be if they'd only done a comparison and used a Canon or Nikon rather than just buying one of the others and saying, "I'm happy." I have had all those lens, as well as Minolta and have to come away saying that I will never purposely own and use anything but a lens from a major camera manufacturer any longer. I can't speak to the issue of others like Pentax, Sony, etc., but I have some suspicions about them with regard to Sigma, Tamron, Tokina.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 12:00:49   #
Paw Paw Bill Loc: d
 
There are two basic outdoor shots - Scenes and Landscapes.

Scenes can be shot with telephoto through wide lenses.

Landscapes are wide views of a larger area than scenes. To get this view with greater than wide focal lengths would require you to shoot from many miles from the subject. Generally the resulting photo is cropped to wider than normal perspective. It can even end up looking like a panaramic view.

I use the Nikon 14-24 f2.8. This lens has a very low distortion effect and is the best wide zoom that I could find for my use. A slight amount of geometric distortion correction to pinch the center and expand the ends will create a great balanced image.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 12:14:09   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
You have been given great advice and several options. Gessman is right about some of the Sigma, Tamron lenses. However, as several people answering this thread (and several threads on this subject, you may want to search UHH for them) there are great lenses available from these manuafactures. When I want to get the widest angle I can, I use the Sigma 10-20 and about 12 is a great spot (as said before in this thread). Hope your Christmas is going well.

Reply
 
 
Dec 25, 2011 12:19:44   #
dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii
 
Have been using the Sigma 15mm for landscapes and wide angle shots. No distortion. Horizon is straight. This is one of my two favorite lenses. The other is the Sigma 18-200mm.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 12:30:07   #
overthemoon Loc: Wisconsin
 
bohleber wrote:
I have 3 lenses, but no wide-angle. Since I love landscapes
I want a good wide-angle lens for my Canon EOS Rebel XSI.
Any suggestions?

Don

sigma 10 20 I love this lens

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 12:30:59   #
overthemoon Loc: Wisconsin
 
Adirondack Hiker wrote:
I only do landscapes, and I just got the Sigma 10-20 mm. GREAT lens, at 12 mm set the aperature to f/13, the focus ring to just over 3 feet, and everything from my toes to the horizon is in focus. Its a must have for landscape.

My lens of choice too love this lens

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 12:41:53   #
Grumpy D Stevens
 
Roger Hicks wrote:
Dear Don,

Are you sure you will get better landscapes with a wide-angle? If I use wide-angles, I tend to get a lot of foreground and a lot of sky, so I find longer lenses more successful.

Cheers,

R.


I agree with Roger. I find that maybe a good 85mm f 1.8 lens can record wonderful pics and if you really want to make a panoramic picture, put it on a tripod and make several to "stitch" together. Even try the vertical (portrait) view and stitch them.
Check out some of the work by the late great Galen Rowell.

Reply
 
 
Dec 25, 2011 13:29:21   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
I highly recommend the Tokina 11-16 mm lens (17- 26 mm equiavlent)for wide angle landscapes and architectural shots. It has a limited zoom range, but is very sharp and has little distortion.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 13:39:05   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
As for the choice of wide versus normal or telephoto lenses for landscapes, it is a matter of subject, and your personal style, such as distant detail versus a wide context. Where a wide angle lens is most useful, is doing architectural shots, either interior or exterior.

I also agree that shooting wider than what you intend as the final composition gives you flexibility in composition as well as room to correct perspective if desired.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 13:44:48   #
Adirondack Hiker Loc: Southern Adirondacks
 
Grumpy D Stevens wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Dear Don,

Are you sure you will get better landscapes with a wide-angle? If I use wide-angles, I tend to get a lot of foreground and a lot of sky, so I find longer lenses more successful.

Cheers,

R.


I agree with Roger. I find that maybe a good 85mm f 1.8 lens can record wonderful pics and if you really want to make a panoramic picture, put it on a tripod and make several to "stitch" together. Even try the vertical (portrait) view and stitch them.
Check out some of the work by the late great Galen Rowell.
quote=Roger Hicks Dear Don, br br Are you sure y... (show quote)


So up at a landscape work shop with an 85 mm lends, and see what you get for comments. Everyone else will have a wide angle mounted on the camera body for a reason. You have no depth of field, even in stitching, which is a special art in itself, far to narrow a field of view to properly capture a scene. While there is a place for longer focal lengths in landscape work, it is not the lens of choice.

Reply
Dec 25, 2011 13:50:27   #
Nevada Chuck
 
I have a Sigma 8-16 and a Tamron 11-18, and am happy with both of them. At first glance, it may appear that I'm into the "overkill" area by having these two lenses, but in this part of the world of optics a little difference can make a noticable difference.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.