Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Where to send photo?
May 31, 2013 23:57:15   #
Golden Rule Loc: Washington State
 
Where would you suggest I send a photo if I want to have it resized bigger than 16x20 and framed and matted? It is 4.28MB and dimensions 4928x3264 so would it be okay to resize larger than 16x20? Thanks for your advice.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 00:28:37   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Golden Rule wrote:
Where would you suggest I send a photo if I want to have it resized bigger than 16x20 and framed and matted? It is 4.28MB and dimensions 4928x3264 so would it be okay to resize larger than 16x20? Thanks for your advice.

To what size do you want it matted? Not the outside dimensions of the frame, but the length and width of the visible print. With this information, we can offer numerous options.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 00:29:30   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
Yeah, but. With those pixels, you're going to start losing details if you go bigger than 12 X 16, based on 300 dpi. If you gotta go bigger, whih is going to cost a bunch anyway, consider a canvas print, and there's always someone having a sale.
EDIT: I looked at your previous posts, and if you're planning to blow up your pup, canvas would be good!

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 00:48:46   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
have you checked your local camera store?

some can put it on vinyl.

these are on 20 x 20 vinyl squares
these are on 20 x 20 vinyl squares...



Reply
Jun 1, 2013 01:16:23   #
Golden Rule Loc: Washington State
 
OddJobber wrote:
Yeah, but. With those pixels, you're going to start losing details if you go bigger than 12 X 16, based on 300 dpi. If you gotta go bigger, whih is going to cost a bunch anyway, consider a canvas print, and there's always someone having a sale.
EDIT: I looked at your previous posts, and if you're planning to blow up your pup, canvas would be good!


I never considered canvas and I would like to go bigger than 16x20 but being new to this I didn't realize that I could possibly lose detail if going bigger. I was thinking about going 24x36 and it will be a dog photo.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 01:18:31   #
Golden Rule Loc: Washington State
 
Mogul wrote:
To what size do you want it matted? Not the outside dimensions of the frame, but the length and width of the visible print. With this information, we can offer numerous options.


I'm looking at 24x36 if possible.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 01:46:48   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Golden Rule wrote:
I'm looking at 24x36 if possible.

Assuming you have either the pixels or the size reversed, you are looking at something less than 140 pixels per inch, which from a viewing distance of 3-4 feet might pass muster, but would look a bit blurry up close. Based on a pristine print at 300ppi, a matted print of 19 X 10 sounds more appropriate, although you could probably get by with a 225ppi print at a more conventional size of 22 X 14. Do you have a Michael's or Aaron Bros. near you. They can mat and frame. Your local camera store can do the print if you can't. That's the easy way our. For more sophisticated solutions, try:

http://www.google.com/search?q=matting+and+framing+services&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 10:48:21   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Try out meridian, I've heard godd stuff about them. They will print your stuff all the way up to 10 feet long at very reasonable prices-quite cheap actually.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 15:04:40   #
lorvey Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
I suggest you take a look at mpix.com ( http://www.mpix.com/products/homedecor/gallerywraps ). I understand Mpix does printing for professional photographers. They can do a canvas wrap 24X30 for $150. It will come ready to hang, won't need to spend any money on matting and framing.

Based on your original photo width of 3264 pixels, your pixels per inch (PPI) will be 136. I've had a canvas made at mpix at this PPI, and I think it looks pretty good. If you use canvas, it will have somewhat of a textured look also. Just wanted to provide another alternative.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 17:09:47   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Oh fer cryin' out loud...just up-size it in Photoshop ( or whatever) to 16x24 or 24x30. Set the PPI to 240 or 250 and it will look great. Canvas does provide a texture that is very forgiving, but a print that size needs to be viewed from a minimum of 4-5 feet anyway.

You absolutely do not need 300ppi.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 17:30:29   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
CaptainC wrote:
Oh fer cryin' out loud...just up-size it in Photoshop ( or whatever) to 16x24 or 24x30. Set the PPI to 240 or 250 and it will look great. Canvas does provide a texture that is very forgiving, but a print that size needs to be viewed from a minimum of 4-5 feet anyway.

You absolutely do not need 300ppi.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 23:56:23   #
lorvey Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
CaptainC wrote:
Oh fer cryin' out loud...just up-size it in Photoshop ( or whatever) to 16x24 or 24x30. Set the PPI to 240 or 250 and it will look great. Canvas does provide a texture that is very forgiving, but a print that size needs to be viewed from a minimum of 4-5 feet anyway.

You absolutely do not need 300ppi.



Well, obviously, I didn't know you could up-size a photo and maintain or increase the resolution. I'm guessing a lot other people on the UHH didn't know this either. Based on my quick review of my copy of PSE, I assume this means making sure "Resample Image" is marked when it is resized? Is that right? Since, I assume pixels have to be added with this process, does the image maintain its original quality?

Reply
Jun 2, 2013 01:20:07   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
lorvey wrote:
Well, obviously, I didn't know you could up-size a photo and maintain or increase the resolution. I'm guessing a lot other people on the UHH didn't know this either. Based on my quick review of my copy of PSE, I assume this means making sure "Resample Image" is marked when it is resized? Is that right? Since, I assume pixels have to be added with this process, does the image maintain its original quality?


Thats it. You got it!
All you need to do is go to Image>Image Size

In the dialog just type 240 in the PPi box and whatever you want in the Width OR Height box. Make sure that neither the W or H box has a dimension LESS than what you want. If one is a bit larger, just fix that by cropping to your desired size.

Yes, the software manufactures pixels, but it is amazing at it and while there is some technical degradation, it is extremely difficult to see and a 24x36 should never be viewed close!

The key here is that your original file has to be close to perfect. Nothing out of focus, and no (or minimal) noise.

My "..cryin' out loud.." was not meant for you. :-) It was in frustration at all the answers you were getting. I made 24x36 images from my D2H and that was only 4MP. Your file is a piece of cake.

The suggestion for MPIX is good. That is the consumer division of Miller's. My understanding is not that the quality is less, just fewer options - not as many products.

Reply
Jun 2, 2013 16:30:21   #
lorvey Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
CaptainC wrote:
Thats it. You got it!
All you need to do is go to Image>Image Size

In the dialog just type 240 in the PPi box and whatever you want in the Width OR Height box. Make sure that neither the W or H box has a dimension LESS than what you want. If one is a bit larger, just fix that by cropping to your desired size.

Yes, the software manufactures pixels, but it is amazing at it and while there is some technical degradation, it is extremely difficult to see and a 24x36 should never be viewed close!

The key here is that your original file has to be close to perfect. Nothing out of focus, and no (or minimal) noise.

My "..cryin' out loud.." was not meant for you. :-) It was in frustration at all the answers you were getting. I made 24x36 images from my D2H and that was only 4MP. Your file is a piece of cake.

The suggestion for MPIX is good. That is the consumer division of Miller's. My understanding is not that the quality is less, just fewer options - not as many products.
Thats it. You got it! br All you need to do is go ... (show quote)



Thank you CaptainC. Good to know up-sizing is an option. I always learn something from your advice. I need to spend a little more time learning all the features of PSE.

Reply
Jun 3, 2013 16:34:45   #
Golden Rule Loc: Washington State
 
Thanks CaptainC. Your advice will be well taken and tried since I have Photoshop. I read a lot on this forum and I'm sure trying to learn from you guys even though I still have quite a learning curve to go.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.