Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
VR Lenses
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 15, 2011 21:18:02   #
ClydeTheDog Loc: Iowa
 
Is there any reason not to leave the vibration reduction turned on? They all seem to have an on off switch.

Reply
Dec 15, 2011 21:19:37   #
nyweb2001
 
I've heard many times NOT to use VR when mounted on a tripod.

Reply
Dec 15, 2011 21:31:18   #
naturalite Loc: Up state NY
 
What I have read is that when the camera is mounted on a tripod. The camera constantly looks for movement whereby causing movement by itself internally.
With my simple P&S kodak, it comes on when I depress the shutter button half way. It is so cool to watch it work. I'll be zoomed out to 840mm and shaking all over. I press the button and the shake goes into slow motion. I just steady and finish my shot.
Also I read that it was developed primarily for long range telephoto photography in the begining. But now it's common and even in cheap cameras. Lucky us!

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2011 21:40:35   #
snowbear
 
I wonder what they do when you are intentionally panning?

Reply
Dec 15, 2011 21:56:07   #
nyweb2001
 
On DSLR's the VR is built into the lens itself...on a P&S obviously it's in the camera. It works pretty good unless you're like me....a coffee addict !

Reply
Dec 15, 2011 21:57:55   #
snowbear
 
Don't Pentax dSLRs have the VR built into the camera?

Reply
Dec 15, 2011 22:02:01   #
ShakyShutter Loc: Arizona
 
Bigger issue comes along with extremely long exposures, usually on a tripod. It is possible the VR function can kick in when you least expect it and blur the image. Most mfg. do disable the VR function during certain long exposure situations however, I'm sure there are exceptions where they recommend the VR be turned off.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2011 00:24:27   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
nyweb2001 wrote:
I've heard many times NOT to use VR when mounted on a tripod.


http://www.slrphotographyguide.com/camera/lens/VR-IS.shtml

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 00:40:38   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Some later high-end lenses know when they are mounted on a tripod and will not search for movement. Earlier versions need to be turned off.

Why turn it off? it uses battery power, you usually need to give it a second or two to sense the motion and compensate. If you trip the shutter during this time you MAY get a blurrier image as the moving lens elements have not yet stabilized.

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 01:22:23   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
I switch the VR off on all my lenses when mounted on a tripod, only because I had a set of shots that came out unexpectedly blurry one time when I left the VR on with a tripod. I always leave it turned on with a monopod though, as there is still enough movement there to justify it. And I have never had a blurry shot that I suspected was from the VR that way. Just seems to work this way for me, don't know about anyone else.

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 05:31:51   #
CeriThurston Loc: London, UK
 
All the replies make me think. I will now try switching off VR as I have noticed some of my tripod and "quick" exposures have turned out more fuzzy than I would have liked. One question, and I should know the answer, but if I am shooting on 1/30 sec. or longer, hand-held (and don't say you shouldn't be doing it) how long should I give it for the VR to take effect?

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2011 06:31:25   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
nyweb2001 wrote:
On DSLR's the VR is built into the lens itself...on a P&S obviously it's in the camera. It works pretty good unless you're like me....a coffee addict !


sony is built into the camera

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 08:36:15   #
Patw28 Loc: PORT JERVIS, NY
 
snowbear wrote:
I wonder what they do when you are intentionally panning?


On the Nikon D700 it senses that you are panning and applies VR to only one axis.

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 08:50:45   #
ClydeTheDog Loc: Iowa
 
Thanks for all the comments. I am new here and am impressed by the thoughtful and respectful replies.

Reply
Dec 16, 2011 11:12:32   #
mawyatt Loc: Clearwater, Florida
 
snowbear wrote:
Don't Pentax dSLRs have the VR built into the camera?


Snowbear,

Not sure about Pentax but I believe Minolta did the first in-camera stabilization. They utilized a technique that actaully moved the Image Sensor. The nice part about this is that it works with standard lenses. Sony acquired Minolta some time ago and thus has this technology now.

Canon and Nikon use in-lens stabilization and claim they can taylor the stabilization to each lens and achieve a better result than with the in-camera technique. I have never used a Minolta, or Sony or Canon DLSR camera (although I have Canon IS binoculars that work well) but have a few Nikon VR lens (70-200 F2.8 VR, 105 F2 VR macro, 18-55 VR kit and 28-105 VR kit). All these Nikon lens with VR stabilization work well and the VR can be very valuable when used properly. I am sure the Canon and Sony stabilization works well also.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.