Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Time Exposed Waterfall
May 12, 2013 07:52:18   #
jwenz Loc: Northern Wisc.
 
How do I get a time exposure of a waterfall in daylight to create that particular "whispy-cottony" appearance? with the slower shutter I always seem to have too much light.

Reply
May 12, 2013 07:56:28   #
FredB Loc: A little below the Mason-Dixon line.
 
Look up "Neutral Density Filter". These are dark glass filters you put on the front of a lens to allow MUCH less light in, which in turn allows for a longer shutter speed to get the 'whispy' effect. They come in different densities.

Reply
May 12, 2013 08:12:13   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
simple, try iso100, f22, 1/10th of a second and if needed as above an ND filter

Reply
 
 
May 12, 2013 08:46:13   #
cockney greg Loc: London E17
 
All the above + tripod.

Reply
May 13, 2013 06:22:47   #
wanakamac Loc: New Zealand & Dewey AZ
 
JR1 is correct Fred. The main thing is to make sure you have a lot of light. dappled if you can get it and try from an angle vertical and horizontal looks more visionary. I attach one I took in Concord a few years ago that best shows the effect at f/20 @ 1/10th sec
IOS 400. Depending on the light and the water flow, try a range of IOS and F stops.

Oct good sun taken at f/20 1/10th ISO 400
Oct good sun taken at f/20 1/10th ISO 400...

Reply
May 13, 2013 06:45:21   #
FredB Loc: A little below the Mason-Dixon line.
 
wanakamac wrote:
JR1 is correct Fred.
Why are you telling me?

Reply
May 13, 2013 06:51:39   #
jwenz Loc: Northern Wisc.
 
thanks to all for your help and comments - however, how do I go about getting a "Neutral Density Filter" for a Canon SX 230 HD camera? Tried to research it and can't seem to find any info on it.

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2013 08:00:39   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
Could not find any filters for the Camera with a google search. buy a small ND filter and jury rig it to the camera lens with gaffer tape

Reply
May 13, 2013 08:05:08   #
Country's Mama Loc: Michigan
 
jwenz wrote:
thanks to all for your help and comments - however, how do I go about getting a "Neutral Density Filter" for a Canon SX 230 HD camera? Tried to research it and can't seem to find any info on it.


http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_2_9?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=neutral%20density%20filter%2052mm&sprefix=Neutral+d%2Caps%2C365

Reply
May 13, 2013 08:08:59   #
FredB Loc: A little below the Mason-Dixon line.
 
jwenz wrote:
thanks to all for your help and comments - however, how do I go about getting a "Neutral Density Filter" for a Canon SX 230 HD camera? Tried to research it and can't seem to find any info on it.
Aha! Had we known what species of camera you are working with, it would have undoubtedly changed our responses. If your camera does not have a lens that accepts screw on filters (as most DLSRs do), another question is just how much flexibility does your camera have? Can you adjust shutter speed?

If you can NOT adjust the shutter speed or other exposure parameters like f/-stop or ISO settings, the ONLY way to get a long enough exposure to achieve the 'silky' look and yet not overexpose, it to stick a really really dark piece of glass in front of your lens. If you can get your camera on a tripod so you don't have to hold both parts, that's a lot easier. Just buy any dark 3- or 4- stop Neutral Density filter of almost any size, and hold in in front of the lens. It won't matter if it wobbles a bit, it's the camera that you want steady. If you can't find an ND filter, do you know any welders? Welder's glass can do in a pinch.

The trick is you are going to need to keep the camera steady while it takes a 1/2 second or so image through a glass, darkly.

Reply
May 13, 2013 08:33:09   #
gideon Loc: Tampa Bay, FL
 
Depending on how bright the light reflected off the waterfall, you'll need a neutral density filter. I prefer to use Cokin Filters. It's not a screw onto your lens system, rather it's a holder that easily attaches to the camera. If the situation is extremely bright, you can even insert multiple filters at the same time to accomplish what you need.

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2013 19:17:03   #
eloi11 Loc: Glasgow, Scotland
 
JR1 wrote:
simple, try iso100, f22, 1/10th of a second and if needed as above an ND filter


Yep, this works fine as long as there is not to much light around. Best to shoot early in the morning or later in the day - think these times are called the golden hours. I recently bought my first 10 stop filter (good advice given by UHH!) and it gives great results of the type sought here - even in bright sunshine.

Reply
May 13, 2013 19:51:21   #
steve40 Loc: Asheville/Canton, NC, USA
 
ND6 filter + Tripod + looooooong exposure. :)

Reply
May 13, 2013 20:02:54   #
Bruce with a Canon Loc: Islip
 
coupe ways.
First tripod, ND filter, I use an ND 4 or an ND8 and or a polarizer. Brighter light, more ND you can use.
Try to keep the aperture in the sweet spot. I prefer f/8-f/16.
Going to f/22 and you risk color shift.
Cloudy, overcast days, early or late light ate great for slow shutter.
I prefer trying a variety of shutter speeds and apertures to get a range of exposures.

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-94451-1.html <<Sample


http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-111427-1.html

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.