Be gentle. I really lie the way these turned out. Yes, I used some professionally software for retouching. The gals LOVE them.
I only had a fluorescent light from Lowes for overhead. The rest of the lighting I fixed in Photoshop. Will eventually get more lighting. This was my first session.
I love the 2nd and 3rd the first the petals on her body are a bit distracting but beautifully done. The poses are great. Lowes lighting, I would of never guessed. Very beautiful. You should be very proud you have talent.
I love B&W....Great Job
nice set, I thought the first one was the best, the tats kinda drew my attention though,,I might would have covered it up,,but thats just my opion,,keep shooting, thanks for sharing
swabubin wrote:
Be gentle. I really lie the way these turned out. Yes, I used some professionally software for retouching. The gals LOVE them.
I only had a fluorescent light from Lowes for overhead. The rest of the lighting I fixed in Photoshop. Will eventually get more lighting. This was my first session.
The only thing I saw, that I thought should be better, is a sharper focus. The focus is very soft to me. Other than that nice shots. :thumbup:
Mike
How many times are you going to post this series? You have THREE (3) identical posts.
I thought this was a FAMILY oriented website! :thumbdown:
If that's your first try at glamour shots, you'll be in magazines before long !! Nice series of shots ! I can't pick them apart at all !!
Val
Loc: Minnesota
I really like the first one! Nice work.
I think that these are well done. I like the first picture best. Good work.
swabubin wrote:
Be gentle. I really lie the way these turned out. Yes, I used some professionally software for retouching. The gals LOVE them.
I only had a fluorescent light from Lowes for overhead. The rest of the lighting I fixed in Photoshop. Will eventually get more lighting. This was my first session.
Joyfullee wrote:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426-1.html
- No nudity, gore, or other adult content. This is a family-safe site. So we can't host any nudity or semi-nudity here.
You must have missed this post from Admin last time this came up.
"But for now, a simple rule -- that doesn't always work, but at least can be used as a rough guide -- is this: if it can be seen on the beach (and wouldn't cause a public scene), then it's OK to post it here."
If you really "lie" them, why ask?
If you are looking for an ego stroke I like top one
and would like 2 alot better if her eyes where there.
Viceroy wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426-1.html
- No nudity, gore, or other adult content. This is a family-safe site. So we can't host any nudity or semi-nudity here.
You must have missed this post from Admin last time this came up.
"But for now, a simple rule -- that doesn't always work, but at least can be used as a rough guide -- is this: if it can be seen on the beach (and wouldn't cause a public scene), then it's OK to post it here."
quote=Joyfullee
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426... (
show quote)
I think if what is depicted in these photos was seen on a beach, it would most definitely cause a public scene. These photos have a sexual connotation.
I think if what is depicted in these photos was seen on a beach, it would most definitely cause a public scene. These photos have a sexual connotation.[/quote]
you need to go to the beach!!! This woman is far more clothed than what you see there. get out of the glades and check out the beach..
Joyfullee wrote:
Viceroy wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426-1.html
- No nudity, gore, or other adult content. This is a family-safe site. So we can't host any nudity or semi-nudity here.
You must have missed this post from Admin last time this came up.
"But for now, a simple rule -- that doesn't always work, but at least can be used as a rough guide -- is this: if it can be seen on the beach (and wouldn't cause a public scene), then it's OK to post it here."
quote=Joyfullee
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426... (
show quote)
I think if what is depicted in these photos was seen on a beach, it would most definitely cause a public scene. These photos have a sexual connotation.
quote=Viceroy quote=Joyfullee
http://www.uglyhed... (
show quote)
You must faint when a Victoria Secret commercial is shown on TV!!! For heaven's sake, lighten up. NOTHING wrong with those photos at all.
p.s. and why do you look when a title says "boudoir photos"???
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.