Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
UV FILTERS ON DIGITAL CAMERAS
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Apr 22, 2013 10:58:12   #
hillary
 
Is it correct that UV filters are not needed on digital cameras since UV only affects film? Also, should I take it off or just place my polarizing filter over the UV?

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 11:03:22   #
windshoppe Loc: Arizona
 
UV filters, while not necessary, make good lens protectors. When using a polarizing filter the UV filter should be removed.

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 11:03:25   #
Malcolm B Loc: Leicester (UK)
 
Sorry don't know the answer to your first question but I have UV or skylight filters on my lenses simply to protect the front element of the lens.

As regards the second question, from memory I think the consensus here is that you remove any filters before using a polarising filter.

I will be interested to see what others have to say.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2013 11:16:01   #
Scoutman Loc: Orlando, FL
 
hillary wrote:
Is it correct that UV filters are not needed on digital cameras since UV only affects film? Also, should I take it off or just place my polarizing filter over the UV?


Lots of prior posts on this in the archives, if you haven't checked.

Try UV Filters as a search term.

I think you will find that polarizing filters are the better choice.

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 11:19:50   #
hillary
 
Thanks to all with the info on the UV, will check the archives, too.

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 12:22:39   #
Chickie Loc: Massachusetts, USA
 
agree with the others. The UV is for protection more than anything else.

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 15:05:15   #
MisterC Loc: Nashville, TN
 
hillary wrote:
Is it correct that UV filters are not needed on digital cameras since UV only affects film? Also, should I take it off or just place my polarizing filter over the UV?

I can attest to the use of uv filters for protection. A very dear photographer friend of mine dropped her 70-300 lens a couple weeks ago and, while the uv filter was trashed, everything else was fine.

Reply
 
 
Apr 22, 2013 16:47:35   #
FrumCA
 
MisterC wrote:
I can attest to the use of uv filters for protection. A very dear photographer friend of mine dropped her 70-300 lens a couple weeks ago and, while the uv filter was trashed, everything else was fine.


Ditto. Something recently put a scratch on the UV filter on my lens which I'm sure saved it from possibly fatal damage. I would strongly recommend that you use one (or other type) as protection.

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 06:43:36   #
dubach
 
i take mine off when shooting sunsets so as to eliminate any flare from the filter then put it back on when done.

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 06:51:35   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
The only filters I use are polarizing , neutral density, and graduated neutral density filters. I protect the lens with lens shades. I have rubber lens shades that I use with the filters

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 07:35:00   #
Nic42 Loc: Cardiff, Wales
 
I think you will find that polarizing filters are the better choice.[/quote]

Polarisers should not be considered as a 'leave on the lens filter'. This is because they can lose you up to 2 stops of light!

Reply
 
 
Apr 23, 2013 08:06:53   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
mborn wrote:
The only filters I use are polarizing , neutral density, and graduated neutral density filters. I protect the lens with lens shades. I have rubber lens shades that I use with the filters


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 08:10:21   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
FrumCA wrote:
Ditto. Something recently put a scratch on the UV filter on my lens which I'm sure saved it from possibly fatal damage. I would strongly recommend that you use one (or other type) as protection.


Scratches usually don't make a difference since light "bends around them...A loss of contrast maybe , if there are enough of them...Check out this link...

http://kurtmunger.com/dirty_lens_articleid35.html

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 09:10:29   #
GHK Loc: The Vale of Eden
 
hillary wrote:
Is it correct that UV filters are not needed on digital cameras since UV only affects film? Also, should I take it off or just place my polarizing filter over the UV?


Yes and no. You certainly don't need a UV filter, although UV light, being light, will affect the sensor. However, if it does cause any undesirable effects, they can be easily remedied in Photoshop.
GHK

Reply
Apr 23, 2013 09:37:28   #
FrumCA
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
Scratches usually don't make a difference since light "bends around them...A loss of contrast maybe , if there are enough of them...Check out this link...

http://kurtmunger.com/dirty_lens_articleid35.html


Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.