billypip wrote:
with a nut-job like that, you have to draw first blood!
......................................................
Admittedly, Kim Jong Un has made a few ridiculous statements, which is response to decades of American bullying and intimidation. George W. Bush made North Korea a charter member of Axis of Evil. American policy makers repeatedly make statements that more diplomatically than Un, but also more credibly threaten military violence. The typical phrase American hinting at brutalization of a country is "nothing is off the table" regarding dealing with the fanciful threat the country poses.
Un's comments are nothing but bluster to back off the US, whose latest provocation is conducting along with South Korea, its war games 12 miles off the North Korean coast. Imagine the crisis we could create if Russia did that with Cuba. Moreover, it is very unlikely that North Korea has advanced enough delivery systems to power a nuclear warhead over an American city. If they did, one to a handful of such deliveries, devastating though they would be, would assure that the entirety of North Korea in less than an hour would be turned into a parking lot.
North Korea does not have the resources that the US covets. That and its defensive nuclear capability means it is not a credible target for the superpower. A war against it would only benefit the military industrial complex, but not result in any foreign loot. Moreover, such an adventure could not be conducted on the pretense of defending anyone, since unlike the US, North Korea is not currently bombing or invading anyone. The cost to Americans would be too high, and the benefits would be merely the transfer of wealth from one group of Americans to a small circle of others. There is a much better target for American militarism; Iran.
Iran also has a leader who makes frequent blustery comments which he cannot back up. Iran, however, has one of the world's largest proven reserves of oil. If and when the United States decides to gain total control of that resource, it would do so whether or not Mahmoud Amadinejad had made any stupid comments prior to the attack. The case of Iraq shows that. Saddam made no threatening comments, unless his testimony about the vigorous Iraqi defense against invasion is a threat. The US still conquered Iraq on the transparently false charges that it had "weapons of mass destruction" and was complicit in the 9-11 terror attacks.
North Korea's status as a nuclear power, despite giving it no offensive abilities, is a deterrent against attack. The Bush II administration relied incessantly against the Axis of Evil, but instead of attacking the one that had a known nuclear arsenal, attacked one it falsely claimed was trying to develop them. The small North Korean inventory was enough to threaten some harsh defensive possibilities, which would have been enough to forestall an American attack even if North Korea were awash with strategic resources. Unfortunately for the jingoist who would wish otherwise, the US will not squash North Korea like a bug.