Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Changing photo dimensions after the fact
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 9, 2013 11:35:58   #
bgcokeonut Loc: St Petersburg, Fl
 
I have a Nikon S8200 and love it. I shoot my pics with the dim: 4608x3456. I get excellent results and I know I use up the SD card quicker that way, it's worth it. My question is: can I change the dim to say '600x450' without compromising the pic? I have done so with a few for experiments and they look ok. My plan is to always do this afterwards. It makes for easier uploading to email, movie maker and such. Anyone know enough about this?
One other quickie: I read about changing the white balance for certain filming. I cannot do this with this Nikon. Is this totally out of the question or is there a workaround?
Thanks for the help and input. Bg

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 13:12:53   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
You can reduce the resolution to 600x450 quite easily but it will significantly effect the quality of the image. 600x450 is okay for an email but you won't be able to print it.

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 13:20:40   #
Searcher Loc: Kent, England
 
Page 67 of your manual explains how to change the white balance.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2013 13:46:50   #
Kentee Loc: Southern California
 
It is recommended that you always save the original file and not save over it. Perhaps copying to a second folder would accomplish that with your originals in the a separate folder.

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 21:48:28   #
bgcokeonut Loc: St Petersburg, Fl
 
Thank you I found it. Now to experiemtn some more. <:)

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 21:53:19   #
bgcokeonut Loc: St Petersburg, Fl
 
Thank you. I will do that.

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 22:00:38   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
bgcokeonut wrote:
Thank you. I will do that.


Click "quote reply" so we know to whom you are addressing your post
(You get the original quote in your post like this one)

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2013 22:02:23   #
Tea8 Loc: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plain.
 
Frank T wrote:
You can reduce the resolution to 600x450 quite easily but it will significantly effect the quality of the image. 600x450 is okay for an email but you won't be able to print it.


What Frank said^^ I put higher res photos than this on Facebook and they look good until they come out blurry when printed at 4in. x 6in. (I was sitting around awhile back when I got a text from a friends asking about her memory card. Yeah I still had it because I was putting photos on it for her and hadn't gotten back to her yet. "Ok, cause I couldn't find it and I printed some of those pictures and they came out blurry," was the response I got. "You printed them off Facebook didn't you?" I asked. Yep she had and they were blurry. So I had to explain why that was and that I would get her the photos she wanted and she would be able to print them without them being blurry. At least I know the measures I'm taking to try and keep them from being stolen and printed works. That and I have to reduce them to a size Facebook can handle anyway.)

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 23:13:49   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
Tea8 wrote:
Frank T wrote:
You can reduce the resolution to 600x450 quite easily but it will significantly effect the quality of the image. 600x450 is okay for an email but you won't be able to print it.


What Frank said^^ I put higher res photos than this on Facebook and they look good until they come out blurry when printed at 4in. x 6in. (I was sitting around awhile back when I got a text from a friends asking about her memory card. Yeah I still had it because I was putting photos on it for her and hadn't gotten back to her yet. "Ok, cause I couldn't find it and I printed some of those pictures and they came out blurry," was the response I got. "You printed them off Facebook didn't you?" I asked. Yep she had and they were blurry. So I had to explain why that was and that I would get her the photos she wanted and she would be able to print them without them being blurry. At least I know the measures I'm taking to try and keep them from being stolen and printed works. That and I have to reduce them to a size Facebook can handle anyway.)
quote=Frank T You can reduce the resolution to 60... (show quote)


Hey Doc ..... huh! ..... guessin again ehheh doc .....

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 23:46:01   #
Kentee Loc: Southern California
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
bgcokeonut wrote:
Thank you. I will do that.


Click "quote reply" so we know to whom you are addressing your post
(You get the original quote in your post like this one)


Okay. Sorry 'bout that.

Reply
Mar 10, 2013 07:31:48   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
Always happy to see Wabbit.
Wabbit wrote:
Tea8 wrote:
Frank T wrote:
You can reduce the resolution to 600x450 quite easily but it will significantly effect the quality of the image. 600x450 is okay for an email but you won't be able to print it.


What Frank said^^ I put higher res photos than this on Facebook and they look good until they come out blurry when printed at 4in. x 6in. (I was sitting around awhile back when I got a text from a friends asking about her memory card. Yeah I still had it because I was putting photos on it for her and hadn't gotten back to her yet. "Ok, cause I couldn't find it and I printed some of those pictures and they came out blurry," was the response I got. "You printed them off Facebook didn't you?" I asked. Yep she had and they were blurry. So I had to explain why that was and that I would get her the photos she wanted and she would be able to print them without them being blurry. At least I know the measures I'm taking to try and keep them from being stolen and printed works. That and I have to reduce them to a size Facebook can handle anyway.)
quote=Frank T You can reduce the resolution to 60... (show quote)


Hey Doc ..... huh! ..... guessin again ehheh doc .....
quote=Tea8 quote=Frank T You can reduce the reso... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2013 09:49:24   #
GHO Loc: Rock # 3
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
bgcokeonut wrote:
Thank you. I will do that.


Click "quote reply" so we know to whom you are addressing your post
(You get the original quote in your post like this one)


Thanks
I was wondering how that worked!
GHO

Reply
Mar 10, 2013 10:16:52   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
bgcokeonut wrote:
I have a Nikon S8200 and love it. I shoot my pics with the dim: 4608x3456. I get excellent results and I know I use up the SD card quicker that way, it's worth it. My question is: can I change the dim to say '600x450' without compromising the pic? I have done so with a few for experiments and they look ok. My plan is to always do this afterwards. It makes for easier uploading to email, movie maker and such. Anyone know enough about this?
One other quickie: I read about changing the white balance for certain filming. I cannot do this with this Nikon. Is this totally out of the question or is there a workaround?
Thanks for the help and input. Bg
I have a Nikon S8200 and love it. I shoot my pics ... (show quote)


Hi!
You will certainly effect the quality of the photo, especially if you later decide to blow it up considerably. What I do is shoot the largest image. When I want to email it to someone, (I use PC), all that's necessary is to 'Right-Click' on the image, select "make my image smaller', and send it. That way you still retain the option of using the largest image size, and still sending a smaller one to your email friends. Best of both worlds. I don't know if there is such an option on a Mac, but I suspect we'll soon here from a "Macster" soon about it. Good Luck.

Reply
Mar 10, 2013 10:24:08   #
Jamers Loc: Michigan
 
Wabbit wrote:
Tea8 wrote:
Frank T wrote:
You can reduce the resolution to 600x450 quite easily but it will significantly effect the quality of the image. 600x450 is okay for an email but you won't be able to print it.


What Frank said^^ I put higher res photos than this on Facebook and they look good until they come out blurry when printed at 4in. x 6in. (I was sitting around awhile back when I got a text from a friends asking about her memory card. Yeah I still had it because I was putting photos on it for her and hadn't gotten back to her yet. "Ok, cause I couldn't find it and I printed some of those pictures and they came out blurry," was the response I got. "You printed them off Facebook didn't you?" I asked. Yep she had and they were blurry. So I had to explain why that was and that I would get her the photos she wanted and she would be able to print them without them being blurry. At least I know the measures I'm taking to try and keep them from being stolen and printed works. That and I have to reduce them to a size Facebook can handle anyway.)
quote=Frank T You can reduce the resolution to 60... (show quote)


Hey Doc ..... huh! ..... guessin again ehheh doc .....
quote=Tea8 quote=Frank T You can reduce the reso... (show quote)


:thumbup: :roll:

Reply
Mar 10, 2013 10:57:19   #
loui
 
You should always shoot using the maximum number of pixels don't reduce this. You need all you got if you happen to make a fairly large print. You cannot notice (usually) much different where you're looking because you camera sensor has several times more pixels than your display - HD displays are about as good as you can get at 2 MP. There area some computer displays to 3.5 MP. But your prints will show the difference. You also need max pixels in case you crop - sometimes there is a good "Sub-picture" you can bring out. You should edit every photo using any computer editor - one comes free on the computer such as Photo Gallery or iPhoto. This will let you crop the photo to help its composition, and you can change its aspect ratio - keep in mind ready-made frame sizes (ratios) at the hobby store to save money framing. You need to begin a picture wall with your best framed work.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.