Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
F stop & depth of field
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 4, 2013 06:21:54   #
michel khushf
 
Are they related and is there a guide to show F stop neede to include front and behind the point of focus?

Reply
Mar 4, 2013 06:26:31   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
michel khushf wrote:
Are they related and is there a guide to show F stop neede to include front and behind the point of focus?


depth of field calculator online.

Reply
Mar 4, 2013 06:33:36   #
TNmike Loc: NW TN
 
Here is a link to an online one like rpavich suggested.

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2013 11:46:51   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
michel khushf wrote:
Are they related and is there a guide to show F stop neede to include front and behind the point of focus?


A depth of field calculator is handy to have.
I recommend the book "Understanding Exposure" by Brian Peterson. He does a wonderful job of explaining the relationship between Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO and how they all work together for you to get the exposure you want.

Reply
Mar 4, 2013 16:14:12   #
charles brown Loc: Tennesse
 
Great app for smart phone called simpleDOF - will tell you everything you need to know. But to fully understand DOF and F stops read the books suggested.

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 06:19:14   #
shutterbug64 Loc: Colorado
 
You can bet the farm that they are related. The larger the opening of the lens (f/2.8) the less depth of field and the smaller the opening (f/16) the more depth of field. The closer you are to the subject, the less depth and the farther away the more depth. The wider angle lenses the more depth of field. Telephoto lens, the less depth of field. As said before, read and shoot, practice, practice, practice, learn, learn, learn. Nothing like the school of hard knox.

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 07:41:27   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
Take a look at Expoaperture2
http://www.expoimaging.com/product-detail.php?cat_id=4&product_id=4&keywords=ExpoAperture2_Depth-of-Field_Guide.
Mechanical - not electronic, fit in your bag unobtrusively

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2013 08:07:52   #
jerzee.shore.shooter
 
Either knox or knocks, it's where most good photographers call their alma mater.

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 08:10:29   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
BboH wrote:
Take a look at Expoaperture2
http://www.expoimaging.com/product-detail.php?cat_id=4&product_id=4&keywords=ExpoAperture2_Depth-of-Field_Guide.
Mechanical - not electronic, fit in your bag unobtrusively


Works great and No Batteries Required...

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 08:35:10   #
Bill gomberg
 
shutterbug64 wrote:
You can bet the farm that they are related. The larger the opening of the lens (f/2.8) the less depth of field and the smaller the opening (f/16) the more depth of field. The closer you are to the subject, the less depth and the farther away the more depth. The wider angle lenses the more depth of field. Telephoto lens, the less depth of field. As said before, read and shoot, practice, practice, practice, learn, learn, learn. Nothing like the school of hard knox.


Correct but as relates to focal length having to do with depth of field .It doesn't and you can prove it .Aperture of lens plus subject to film/sensor distance are the only controlling factors .
I am now braced for e's declaring I'm a know nothing nut .


Ing f

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 08:50:16   #
shutterbug64 Loc: Colorado
 
jerzee.shore.shooter wrote:
Either knox or knocks, it's where most good photographers call their alma mater.


Yup no matter how you say it I have been going there for 45 years and still at it as my main living.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2013 08:50:34   #
kwils Loc: Salem, Ma
 
There is depth of field calculator app for Android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aimenrg.dof&hl=en
And for iphone or ipad.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/depth-of-field-calculator/id356339910?mt=8

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 09:58:56   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
Bill gomberg wrote:
shutterbug64 wrote:
You can bet the farm that they are related. The larger the opening of the lens (f/2.8) the less depth of field and the smaller the opening (f/16) the more depth of field. The closer you are to the subject, the less depth and the farther away the more depth. The wider angle lenses the more depth of field. Telephoto lens, the less depth of field. As said before, read and shoot, practice, practice, practice, learn, learn, learn. Nothing like the school of hard knox.


Correct but as relates to focal length having to do with depth of field .It doesn't and you can prove it .Aperture of lens plus subject to film/sensor distance are the only controlling factors .
I am now braced for e's declaring I'm a know nothing nut .


Ing f
quote=shutterbug64 You can bet the farm that they... (show quote)


Actually, when you change the focal length, the Apparent DOF is changing, not the actual DOF. When you change the focal length, the DOF appears to change, but in reality, and under close inspection, it isn't - it's an optical illusion.

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 10:51:05   #
Bill gomberg
 
mfeveland wrote:
Bill gomberg wrote:
shutterbug64 wrote:
You can bet the farm that they are related. The larger the opening of the lens (f/2.8) the less depth of field and the smaller the opening (f/16) the more depth of field. The closer you are to the subject, the less depth and the farther away the more depth. The wider angle lenses the more depth of field. Telephoto lens, the less depth of field. As said before, read and shoot, practice, practice, practice, learn, learn, learn. Nothing like the school of hard knox.


Correct but as relates to focal length having to do with depth of field .It doesn't and you can prove it .Aperture of lens plus subject to film/sensor distance are the only controlling factors .
I am now braced for e's declaring I'm a know nothing nut .


Ing f
quote=shutterbug64 You can bet the farm that they... (show quote)


Actually, when you change the focal length, the Apparent DOF is changing, not the actual DOF. When you change the focal length, the DOF appears to change, but in reality, and under close inspection, it isn't - it's an optical illusion.
quote=Bill gomberg quote=shutterbug64 You can be... (show quote)




Agreed . Now we I expect a deluge of letters disagreeing with us .

Reply
Mar 5, 2013 11:17:24   #
emmons267 Loc: Arizona, Valley of the Sun
 
Bill gomberg wrote:
mfeveland wrote:
Bill gomberg wrote:
shutterbug64 wrote:
You can bet the farm that they are related. The larger the opening of the lens (f/2.8) the less depth of field and the smaller the opening (f/16) the more depth of field. The closer you are to the subject, the less depth and the farther away the more depth. The wider angle lenses the more depth of field. Telephoto lens, the less depth of field. As said before, read and shoot, practice, practice, practice, learn, learn, learn. Nothing like the school of hard knox.


Correct but as relates to focal length having to do with depth of field .It doesn't and you can prove it .Aperture of lens plus subject to film/sensor distance are the only controlling factors .
I am now braced for e's declaring I'm a know nothing nut .


Ing f
quote=shutterbug64 You can bet the farm that they... (show quote)


Actually, when you change the focal length, the Apparent DOF is changing, not the actual DOF. When you change the focal length, the DOF appears to change, but in reality, and under close inspection, it isn't - it's an optical illusion.
quote=Bill gomberg quote=shutterbug64 You can be... (show quote)




Agreed . Now we I expect a deluge of letters disagreeing with us .
quote=mfeveland quote=Bill gomberg quote=shutte... (show quote)


LOL... I know what you mean. I'm sure there will be someone who disagrees.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.