120 Years ago and He was aware of it ??? (Page 3): Sure !!! why not , anything goes with you ,except the facts He's kinda right, actually. Look up "bourbon Democrats". Post-Civil War...

amyinsparta Loc: White county, TN

FredB wrote:

quote=FRENCHY quote=ole sarg The democrat party ... (show quote)

thank you for pointing that out.

ted45 Loc: Delaware

roger allen wrote:

quote=RixPix quote=FRENCHY I guess this will sti... (show quote)

Wow, you two have demonstrated racism, bigotry and condescension all in one simple post. It is good we have such informed and open minds available to us at UHH.

In the real history Lincoln was not opposed to slavery. The war was about States Rights and in that regard it is correct that today's Republican Party is equal to Mr. Grigsby's Democratic party. Any Democrat I have had a conversation with recently is basically opposed to States' or individual rights.

sundancer2004 Loc: oak island, nc

ole sarg wrote:

The democrat party of 1890 is the republican party of 2013. Thus, he was correct in his assessment!

one thing you can count on with sarge, consistency. The republican party was the party of Lincoln. The party which began to make true"all people being created equal" Not the Democratic party. I've read some of his so called "they cant argue with this rants, allegedly based on facts, all proven, through research to be false or debatable. I doubt if he ever was an NCO, just another wannabee

sundancer2004 Loc: oak island, nc

ted45 wrote:

quote=roger allen quote=RixPix quote=FRENCHY I ... (show quote)

A pink (communist pinko) elephant at that!

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

FRENCHY wrote:

I guess this will stir the pudding a bit more , but , how tru .

Doesn't stir the pot the way you think. After LBJ, repubs and demo traded places. Repubs were pro black, then turned racist as the democrats passed civil rights law.

Now they're merely crazy.

Waiting for them to exit--any day now...

frankeieio Loc: Bend, Oregon

What is even more interesting Gitchigumi is after you posted information, giving full context to the story behind the image, it is ignored while those with nothing better to do than be opposite something, get there shots in...

Gitchigumi wrote:

BW326 wrote:

ole sarg wrote:

The democrat party of 1890 is the republican party of 2013. Thus, he was correct in his assessment!

Quite right. Here's a little background on N. Grigsby ...

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/grigsby.asp

Interesting read on the real history... Too bad some folks don't bother to check facts or consider the bigger picture before making judgements or assumptions of "fact".

pj81156 Loc: St. Petersburg, FL

In spite of your feelings against the Democratic Party, which of course is not the same now as it was then, it is hard to be a Republican when they are so fractured, so split. If you Republicans want to win a national election, you better spend more time cleaning up your own act than finding fault with the Democrats.

Batman Loc: South-Central Texas

Well, I guess that settles it! SNOPES said it, and we all know that Snopes is "Fair. Balanced. Unafraid" in what it says is the truth. Ain't we lucky to have such balanced reporting?

TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails

The politician that tells the best lies wins.
The problem is NOT Democrats/Republicans it is politicians.

ole sarg Loc: south florida

It seems that the right wing likes to run around proving their ignorance in public.

Much like Carl Rove disputing the election results live in public on Fox News!

ole sarg Loc: south florida

It seems that the right wing likes to run around proving their ignorance in public.

Much like Carl Rove disputing the election results live in public on Fox News!

Batman Loc: South-Central Texas

OK, let's look at what the Left Wingers have revealed about their intelligence at the Polling Places:
Elected, then re-elected Barack Obama.
Elected, then re-elected Harry Reid.
Elected, then re-elected Nancy Pelosi.
..need I go on?

roger allen Loc: another planet

Batman wrote:

OK, let's look at what the Left Wingers have revealed about their intelligence at the Polling Places:
Elected, then re-elected Barack Obama.
Elected, then re-elected Harry Reid.
Elected, then re-elected Nancy Pelosi.
..need I go on?

well holy un rigged election there batman, said Robin, it seems it was what the public wanted. Because all the money they got from corrupt corporations couldnt buy the election. get over it the worm has turned -lol for the next thirty years the republicans will be the losing party batman- really , you call yourself batman -lol

PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas

FRENCHY wrote:

I guess this will stir the pudding a bit more , but , how tru .

How true? The two major parties have essentially switched roles since the time this was carved into stone. You didn't now that, but still felt you had an excuse to be didactic. Obviously you are a right wing, Republican. Your intention was to smite the Democratic party, but you will have to try a different approach after wiping the egg off your face.

FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga

PNagy wrote:

FRENCHY wrote:

I guess this will stir the pudding a bit more , but , how tru .

How true? The two major parties have essentially switched roles since the time this was carved into stone. You didn't now that, but still felt you had an excuse to be didactic. Obviously you are a right wing, Republican. Your intention was to smite the Democratic party, but you will have to try a different approach after wiping the egg off your face.

I am an individual, who don't need advices as what to do for myself , Republican ? No , i can said that I leaned much on the side of liberty , I don't have to smite anybody , but if I look at the resuilt were this country is going , I can said that we are in deep s....t ,even if you admit it or not . I guess I stirred a bowl of s...t right ? and sometime it hurt .
Oh well , that's.what is fantastic about this Country the liberty to tell other what we feel without having the fear ( for now at least ) of the stupid " governement "