Lens - Tamron vs Canon
Nov 1, 2012 09:06:52 #
I have a T2i with the standard 'kit' lens - 18-55 and 55-250. Am thinking of upgrading and looking at the Tamron 18-270 PZD model. Of course there is some cash involved - over $500 with my kit lens in trade.
Is this an upgrade?
Any users of both have comments to share?
I have read many posts / threads on Tamron and the Tamron 18-270 - most are quite positive, a few negative, and a few just like others, some preferring a Canon L series.
My real question is still - experience with both the Canon kit lens versus the Tamron 18-270? Good move?
thanks, Walter
Is this an upgrade?
Any users of both have comments to share?
I have read many posts / threads on Tamron and the Tamron 18-270 - most are quite positive, a few negative, and a few just like others, some preferring a Canon L series.
My real question is still - experience with both the Canon kit lens versus the Tamron 18-270? Good move?
thanks, Walter
Nov 1, 2012 17:12:02 #
I have the same equipment. I am still trying to get the most I can out my present glass. I bought a 50mm 1.8 to give me some faster glass but I have not pushed any of my lenses to their respective capability. The Tamron 18-270 is, according to my reading, a fine lense and recommended for travel to lighten the load. I am not sure that the Tamron is better that what we have, just in a smaller package. I'm saving the bucks for a faster an higher quality lens.
Nov 1, 2012 17:27:54 #
NSWalter wrote:
I have a T2i with the standard 'kit' lens - 18-55 ... (show quote)
As other have questioned in the past on this forum on similar questions, you have to ask yourself, "What can you do with the new lens that you can't do with your current ones?" If you think your photos will dramatically improve because the upgrade is a better lens, you might find yourself quite disappointed.
On the other hand, if you want to start taking more close-up pictures, then consider a macro lens. If you need more speed or shoot in low light situations, consider a prime lens with larger apertures.
If you love acquiring and buying different lenses, that's a whole different issue.
Nov 2, 2012 00:26:57 #
At times I think my photos are not as crisp as they should be. I do my best to rule out operator issues. So then I look at my equipment. Camera shop guy also says probably not much difference in quality.
I think I will take my camera to the shop - take about 5 pictures with my kit lens, then try his Tamron. I will probably shoot manual to level the playing field as much as possible.
Last option maybe my optometrist!
Thanks for the feedback.
I think I will take my camera to the shop - take about 5 pictures with my kit lens, then try his Tamron. I will probably shoot manual to level the playing field as much as possible.
Last option maybe my optometrist!
Thanks for the feedback.
Nov 2, 2012 02:57:29 #
elandel
Loc: Milan, Italy
The 18-270 is versatility with decent quality, if that's what you need get it.
Nov 2, 2012 07:21:17 #
the canon l lens,if you keep getting better you will end up with canon l lens,you can find some great deals on used,
they have many from 70-200 and longer
they have many from 70-200 and longer
Nov 2, 2012 10:29:16 #
The Tamron is a convenience compromise. It may be a very slight step up in IQ but probably not noticeable if at all. So, if you value convenience over IQ - it's for you. If you value IQ, it will take 2 lenses to get from 18 to 270mm, in which case if your only buying one lens - do you value the short end more or the long end more ? For the short end, Canon 15-85 or the Sigma 17-70. For the long end, Canon 70-200 F4 L with 1.4 extender is very hard to beat !
Nov 2, 2012 11:20:58 #
How "fast" are the lenses (maximum aperture)? If they are the same speed, all you gain is the convenience of a greater focal length zoom range on a single lens. The greater focal length distance will not be noticeable. Generally the greater total zoom of a lens, the lower its performance. I would probably stick with the Canon lenses.
Nov 2, 2012 13:24:39 #
NSWalter wrote:
I have a T2i with the standard 'kit' lens - 18-55 ... (show quote)
I have a negative. I own only one Tamron lens, the 18-200 and I'll buy no more from this company. My lens has aberration and focus issues.
None of my Canon lenses have either.
Nov 2, 2012 14:11:23 #
I have the 550D (Rebel T2i) with the kit lens, the 70 - 200 and the 50mm 1.8 (which is great) but since buying the Tamron it has not been off the camera. The VR (IS or whatever) is so good that that I can shoot at speeds that would be blurred out before. Before I always was thinking that if only I had the other lens, but short of L series money this might just be the lens for me.
Nov 4, 2012 10:24:08 #
Nov 4, 2012 10:27:13 #
Greg
Loc: Maryland
I can't speak from experience, but from the reviews I've read, there are big swings in the quality of the lens. I have considered this lens as well to have a wide range walk around lens, however if I were to decide on it, I don't think I would just buy one untried. I would have to put one or more of them on camera and test the individual lens that I would be getting, not a showroom model or one untried mail order.
NSWalter wrote:
I have a T2i with the standard 'kit' lens - 18-55 ... (show quote)
Feb 11, 2013 01:24:47 #
I'm off to the horse races. I do not want to carry a load so I bought a Tamron 18-270mm. I have been practicing and I hope that I come up with some winners!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.