Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Reflections on Gun control.
Page <<first <prev 18 of 19 next>
Jan 17, 2013 12:04:03   #
Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana
 
Reddog wrote:
Bangee5 wrote:
Reddog wrote:
Funny how you have to pass a test, take a picture and show I.D and take a driving test to show you know the safety laws to drive a automobile, but The NRA is against background checks or any other requirement to own a Gun!


You only need to take the drivers test once and renew your lic. every two to four years. However, you DO NOT need an ID to vote (ain't that great!). The NRA is not against background checks, just the attack on the 2nd. My right to own a gun (I don't own a gun, yet) or drive a car or to vote is none of your business. Attacking my rights is a fight.
quote=Reddog Funny how you have to pass a test, t... (show quote)
You need to research the NRA, They have fought background checks at Gun Shows tooth and Nail. When Your so called rights Butcher our Babies, you Damn right have a Fight!!!!!
quote=Bangee5 quote=Reddog Funny how you have to... (show quote)


How do you intend to stop me or my rights from Butcherin' your babies? Better get yourself a gun to protect those babies - but then you are against gun rights - so it is you who is going to let those babies be butchered. Don't you see how dumb all this is? Your are fighting against your own rights. Whats next? your right to free speech? Your right to vote? It is your rights as well as mine!

Reply
Jan 17, 2013 12:31:06   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
Reddog wrote:
Funny how you have to pass a test, take a picture and show I.D and take a driving test to show you know the safety laws to drive a automobile, but The NRA is against background checks or any other requirement to own a Gun!


Hey Doc ..... you making this up or did you read it somewhere

Reply
Jan 17, 2013 12:34:35   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
Reddog wrote:
Bangee5 wrote:
Reddog wrote:
Funny how you have to pass a test, take a picture and show I.D and take a driving test to show you know the safety laws to drive a automobile, but The NRA is against background checks or any other requirement to own a Gun!


You only need to take the drivers test once and renew your lic. every two to four years. However, you DO NOT need an ID to vote (ain't that great!). The NRA is not against background checks, just the attack on the 2nd. My right to own a gun (I don't own a gun, yet) or drive a car or to vote is none of your business. Attacking my rights is a fight.
quote=Reddog Funny how you have to pass a test, t... (show quote)
You need to research the NRA, They have fought background checks at Gun Shows tooth and Nail. When Your so called rights Butcher our Babies, you Damn right have a Fight!!!!!
quote=Bangee5 quote=Reddog Funny how you have to... (show quote)


Hey Doc ..... all raspberries ..... I now question anything you post

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2013 13:27:35   #
WildBill Loc: South West Florida
 
TrainNut wrote:
WildBill wrote

"All firearm deaths
•Number of deaths: 31,672
•Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.3"

That includes justifiable homicide (cops and people defending themselves) and suicide.


Yes it does. It includes everything and that is the problem... If only murders were represented (not suicides, self defense, police force, etc, liberals would have a big problem trying to sway anyone to their side. Funny how they include unrelated stats when talking guns but quickly dismiss actual facts when defending their position. That is why conservative radio and tv is called bias by them, only the liberal side is allowed to be argued or you are a baby killing moron and lack the intellect to have a gun... Arguing with a liberal is pointless other than someone undecided may see how unfounded the argument against guns is.

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 07:08:52   #
Robert G Loc: Raised in Oh. & Ky. live in Az now
 
"You need to research the NRA, They have fought background checks at Gun Shows tooth and Nail. When Your so called rights Butcher our Babies, you Damn right have a Fight!!!!!

Reddog"


My rights did NOT butcher anyones babies ! ! Those were the actions of a psychopath, in which wear lies the cause of the problems. You can take away the guns but the psychos will still be there. We as a society need to address the REAL problem, and thats identifying and preventing these sick people from being able act on there ill will. Most often these people are "missed" even after years of showing signs that were overlooked by family memebers,friends,
school officials, the police, court authorities, and mental heatlth care workers. So if you REALLY want to stop the problem then go to where the problem lies, with us as a society for failing to protect ourselves from such people, We need to identify, isolate and restrict these poeple from acting on there missions of mayhem.

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 07:28:40   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
In every country where the guns were confiscated, crime went up. Example Austrailia..crime up 66% Funny thing!!!! when someone kills someone the idiot control freaks want to take the guns from those who didn't do it.
JR1 wrote:
100%, unfortunately in the UK we have a common sense approach not matched by the masses of the NRA in the USA

Things will only change when enough gun owning citizens CHILDREN and loved ones are killed by gun owners.

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 07:30:17   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
Robert G wrote:
"You need to research the NRA, They have fought background checks at Gun Shows tooth and Nail. When Your so called rights Butcher our Babies, you Damn right have a Fight!!!!!

Reddog"


My rights did NOT butcher anyones babies ! ! Those were the actions of a psychopath, in which wear lies the cause of the problems. You can take away the guns but the psychos will still be there. We as a society need to address the REAL problem, and thats identifying and preventing these sick people from being able act on there ill will. Most often these people are "missed" even after years of showing signs that were overlooked by family memebers,friends,
school officials, the police, court authorities, and mental heatlth care workers. So if you REALLY want to stop the problem then go to where the problem lies, with us as a society for failing to protect ourselves from such people, We need to identify, isolate and restrict these poeple from acting on there missions of mayhem.
"You need to research the NRA, They have foug... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2013 07:41:06   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
I will say this...Maybe if every teacher had a 38 special on his belt or purse, maybe some of those precious children could have been saved. Taking away the guns is not the answer....background checks are needed...remember this the freak who killed those children and teachers at Sandy Hook stole the guns from his mother, before he killed her.

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 07:47:35   #
Robert G Loc: Raised in Oh. & Ky. live in Az now
 
Amen Scubie,

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 09:17:24   #
Gnslngr
 
Scubie wrote:
In every country where the guns were confiscated, crime went up. Example Austrailia..crime up 66% Funny thing!!!! when someone kills someone the idiot control freaks want to take the guns from those who didn't do it.


Nope. You're wrong. Well, you're right but your context is wrong. First, Australians never had a right to own a gun - ownership was restricted to those with an occupational need, members of government approved sporting clubs, hunters and collectors. And when the government began it's buyback program, in 1997, it only really applied to pump-action and semi-automatic weapons. Those with a legitimate need to own those types of weapons can still get a government permit.

Given that context, anyone that posits that gun control was the cause of an increased crime rate is suspect - the vast, vast majority of Australians could not and did not own a gun prior to the buyback program. The figures used to prove the point you are trying to make are from the year immediately after the buyback - the program had not completely taken effect.

Sorry, but gun control does not cause crime. :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 11:35:03   #
Bmac Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Gnslngr wrote:
Sorry, but gun control does not cause crime. :thumbup:


Nor does gun control prevent it, so why create new government laws. 8-)

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2013 11:43:26   #
Gnslngr
 
Bmac wrote:
Nor does gun control prevent it, so why create new government laws. 8-)


Sorry, but it does prevent it. But it must be universal - not restricted to one city or state, but nationwide. And it needn't be all-inclusive. Rifles and shotguns (which are far, far more efficient at home protection than a revolver or other handgun) should remain legalized for hunters and sportsmen. Handguns, because of their easily concealed nature, would be better off banned along with assault-style weaponry and semi-automatic rifles, guns, etc.

I am aware you don't agree with me. Nonetheless, I consider that proposal a reasonable one. Unfortunately, the activist SCOTUS has made my proposal moot. :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 11:53:06   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
Ok I stand corrected..I checked your info and are right.
Gnslngr wrote:
Scubie wrote:
In every country where the guns were confiscated, crime went up. Example Austrailia..crime up 66% Funny thing!!!! when someone kills someone the idiot control freaks want to take the guns from those who didn't do it.


Nope. You're wrong. Well, you're right but your context is wrong. First, Australians never had a right to own a gun - ownership was restricted to those with an occupational need, members of government approved sporting clubs, hunters and collectors. And when the government began it's buyback program, in 1997, it only really applied to pump-action and semi-automatic weapons. Those with a legitimate need to own those types of weapons can still get a government permit.

Given that context, anyone that posits that gun control was the cause of an increased crime rate is suspect - the vast, vast majority of Australians could not and did not own a gun prior to the buyback program. The figures used to prove the point you are trying to make are from the year immediately after the buyback - the program had not completely taken effect.

Sorry, but gun control does not cause crime. :thumbup:
quote=Scubie In every country where the guns were... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 11:55:53   #
Bmac Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Gnslngr wrote:
Bmac wrote:
Nor does gun control prevent it, so why create new government laws. 8-)


Sorry, but it does prevent it. But it must be universal - not restricted to one city or state, but nationwide. And it needn't be all-inclusive. Rifles and shotguns (which are far, far more efficient at home protection than a revolver or other handgun) should remain legalized for hunters and sportsmen. Handguns, because of their easily concealed nature, would be better off banned along with assault-style weaponry and semi-automatic rifles, guns, etc.
I am aware you don't agree with me. Nonetheless, I consider that proposal a reasonable one. Unfortunately, the activist SCOTUS has made my proposal moot. :thumbup:
quote=Bmac Nor does gun control prevent it, so wh... (show quote)


Actually, I do agree with you now, as you stated, we are "wasting our time."
:thumbup:

I am responsible for boldface below.

Gnslngr wrote:

Biden is wasting his time, Gun Control is useless
In the clip below, a fellow uses a high capacity clip he made by downloading it off of the internet and making it on a 3D printer. We are not YET at the place when you can make a gun that won't explode in your face on one of those printers, but we cannot be that far away. That means that, despite the bans and the passion of the gun control advocates, advanced automatic weaponry will soon be available to anyone with a computer (felons, known violent criminals, etc.) and the willingness to look hard on the internet.

We're wasting our time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q10Jz2qIog8#!
br Biden is wasting his time, b Gun Control is ... (show quote)


Above quote from:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-92286-1.html

Reply
Feb 10, 2013 12:49:21   #
Gnslngr
 
Bmac wrote:

Actually, I do agree with you now, as you stated, we are "wasting our time."
:thumbup:


First, let me thank you. It is so gratifying to know that someone is so enamored of my opinions that they have catalogued them and can recall them with enough specificity to pull them up at a moment's notice. I am glad that you hang on my every word; you may learn something yet. That said, the quote you have used is, in fact, my own. However, after discussing this very important issue with an expert in the field I have changed my mind - we are not now, nor are we likely to be in the first part of this century, at a place where a 3d printer would be capable of making an automatic weapon. Therefore, gun control becomes a possibility and, to my mind, a necessity.

Playing games of oneupmanship is fun, but it is something one does when as a third grader and gives up as an adult. Both in the thread you cite and this one, you have not posited a cogent opinion. You merely, as you do all over this forum, want to pretend you're back in grammar school and thus, you use the tactics of a child. Frankly, it's unbecoming - you should know you look like less than a man (or woman, if that's what you are) and more like a little boy or girl.

Note that I am unafraid to learn, and through that newly acquired knowledge, change my mind. Would that you had the maturity to do the same. :thumbup:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 18 of 19 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.